Setting the stage. Comparing the most important lesson of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air", that being the mathematic structure of "Robert Gordon's 7 Days," to the mathematic structure of the MOT, I find that the former suggests a change to the latter.
A synchronicity that has occurred this morning suggests I am on the correct path.
Robert Gordon, in a plain reading of the "7 days," circled the earth at the latitude of New York City in 7 days (forget the dual complications that he traveled in the direction of the earths rotation and the five hours between the completion of the circle in Canada vs New York City). 7 days or 168 hours. The MOT as configured, 168 years when attributing two days per line.
It has always troubled me that there were 2 days attributed for every line, but three factors compelled me to configure it with two days per line. First, the poem "tid bits' on, notably, page 45. It suggested not simply a doubling and redoubling of efforts but a doubling and redoubling of the 15341 line structure of TTTTA. And so I did; double the whole structure and also 'appointed' two days per line. Second, and as a result, a great synchronicity occurred. Prompted by a similar methodology found in the Nicholas Cage/Ryne Douglas Pearson movie "Knowing " I found that the day, September 11, 2001, fell on exactly the line number of the MOT that specified the number of innocent lives that were lost on that date. Third, when you follow the link to the "great synchronicity," you'll see I discovered and posted the date I made that discovery; it was September 11, 2015. Check the date of that essay. That was a real time experience that I had and you can re prove it just by reading the date stamp on that essay.
But the MOT, configured with 2 days per line, didn't work....and I proved that as well. I studied 88 years of great disasters and tried to correlate them with dates in the MOT. Many, many were close to describing the number of fatalities that occurred in those events; but the exercise was not satisfying. And then there was my great mistake. I derived several acrostic/telestic encoded messages suggesting great Pacific Coast earthquakes and a Yellowstone Supervolcano events in 2016. They did not occur.
I remain confident these calamities will occur but most geologists, I speculate, would say they are eventualities given enough time. Its the "when" and the clues in the MOT do not tell me the "when." This episode in my research convinced me I will only know the "when" upon discovering how the MOT actually works. Mr. Gann didn't paint a verbal picture for those who do not know the math or who do not want to work to find the answer according the math. The great golfer Ben Hogan used to say the the answer is in the dirt, meaning you have to spend the time on the practice range. In this endeavor, the answer is in the math. Mr. Gann does not paint a picture for the lazy. You must find it in the math.
Recap, I'm comparing the structure of RG's 7 days to the MOT in the last couple days and am struck (again) by the 168; 168 hours and 168 years, respectively. 168 or 1/15th of the significant number 2520. The smallest number into which each of the 9 single digits can be divided to produce a whole number. Also, the Biblical "Great Week" considered by many as a key to prophecy. Math and prophecy.
The Robert Gordon lesson suggested to me that I re consider the MOT as being configured as a day per line; not two days per line. Reconfiguration destroys the "9/11/2001 and innocent lives" synchronicity. No way around it. If the MOT is denominated in 1 day per line, that synchronicity never occurred. Or did it? Mr. Gann embedded in TTTTA many unmistakeable details of the movie "Knowing." Mr. Gann intended that one of the greatest events in the life of this nation be the "hook" that binds me to the MOT. But I'm still confronted with MOT not being predictive (other than 9/11/2001) when configured at 2 days per line.
Today's synchronicity. Consider September 11, 2001 performed two purposes for Mr. Gann. First, it hooked an obsessive finite mathematician onto discovering the MOT. But second, it anchors the beginning date (page 78 of TTTTA):
We must "begin right." The anchor.
Today I woke up resolved that the correct beginning date of the MOT should be 9/11/2001 and the MOT should be denominated in a day per line. From that, a quick math calculation.
In the original MOT, we found 9/11/2001 on cumulative line 2699, chapter line number 279 (2699+279=2978 considered 2977 innocent lives lost since there are 2 days on that line):
Now, consider the MOT re appointed as a day per line with line 2699 as the beginning. Well, what is today? It is August 24, 2017 and there are 5826 days between 9/11/2001 and today. So, I back up 5826 lines in the MOT. Above line 2699, there are only 2699 lines to the first line of the book. So I count up 2699 lines and then start counting down the residual 3,127 lines. And what do I find on line 3127?
To me, having invested the last three years of my life (not to speak of having read TTTTA for the first time some 42 years ago, a synchronicity in itself) in understanding TTTTA, this occurrence dwarfs any discovery of the past three years.
Beginning on exactly line 3127 above, you find spelled the word "PI." Pi, the mathematic substance of the circle. That was the first synchronicity I discovered today. Or was it just a coincidence and I'm over reacting...again? After all, "Pi" is just two letters and an acrostic word Pi is hardly an improbable acrostic word to find in random text.
No, it is not a coincidence. Read those two paragraphs which the word "Pi" straddles. They are on page 78, the page cited above on how to "begin right." The math exercise has brought me back to the instruction that gave rise to the math exercise. It is a circle of logic and math. It is not a coincidence. It was both predicted and intended.
Moreover again, an inquiring mind would read, intently, pages 76-80. I did even though I've read them 10s of times if not hundreds of times before. The elements of his method are:
- History repeats
- Curve of the future
- Begin right
- Determine the cycle
The synchronicity is that it happened today. I awoke resolved to appoint a day for a line and begin with September 11, 2001. And it led me to Pi and back to WD Gann's method of forecasting. That would not have worked neither yesterday nor tomorrow.
***
This is a very convoluted essay. It is an ad hoc notation, its for me. If 200 people read it, maybe 20 will understand the MOT context and I expect maybe two or three will possess the will and knowledge of my work to work it out for themselves. Indeed, "The general public is not ready for it and probably would not understand or believe it..." to borrow from the above. Personally working it out is the only way to understand. Words cannot create clear understanding. Only math is the language 'men and countries can agree upon' again to borrow. And I doubt anyone will get to that point, the point where I am (presuming it is a valuable point at which I have arrived). I am only at a beginning.
Res ipsa loquitur
Jim Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.