ENS 3: If you wanted to prove foresight...

We know what the "experts" do.  They tell you they can and sell you a newsletter or course.  Do they let you follow them around the NYSE trading floor (as if much trading actually occurs "on the floor" these days) and "audit" you in real time?

No, I'm aware of only WD Gann who did that in real time and as documented in "The Ticker Interview."  And he was successful, entering 286 trades in 25 trading days incurring a mere 22 losses.  Statistically, that is not possible.  I'll raise the stakes.  I believe, had he thought it prudent, he would have not incurred those losses...but that's me.  Why?  Read the preface to "The Magic Word" penned by Renato P. Alghini a noteworthy 37 years ago in October 1979:

Again, why?  Because a 100% win ratio would have been, personally, dangerous.

If, as Mr. Alghini offers, you want your achievement known, you bury the "treasure" on the "isle of long ago" to reprise yesterday's essay and Benjamin F. Taylor's "Isle of Long Ago" that appears on page 164 of Mr. Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"

Mr. Gann's motivation for buying his treasures in TTTTA, if he did, may have had a bit of pride in it. But, in my opinion, there is a far greater reason.  But that's for another essay at another time.

First we have to prove he did have the ability of foresight and then how.  Did Mr. Gann bury a 100% record in his "Isle of Long Ago," TTTTA?

I've gone a long way to proving foresight; dozens of instances beginning with 6th and 7th prophecies.  Because of my errors along the way, Mr. Gann's record appears less than what it might be.  Let's remedy the mistakes of the researcher by performing an objective test.  Either it works or it does not.

The test will follow this logic.  If I wanted to prove foresight to a later generation (because I would fear for my safety with that "100% win rate), I would bury a series of predictions to be discovered later.  If I really wanted to show off, I might predict the person who would uncover these 'treasures,' the date on which the realization would occur and the street on which he lives (the 7th Prophecy).  To tip everyone off, I might predict the greatest disaster of that later age with clues like a misspelled "Mammouth Building" in New York City that is 110-stories (the 6th Prophecy).  That's if I were smart like Mr. Gann.  The best I can do is to follow the bread crumbs.  And the trail of crumbs that has most attracted me in the recent weeks has been earthquakes.

Specifically, I'd bury a list of the greatest earthquakes of the MOT (WD Gann "Map of time") period of 168 years in that Isle of Long Ago...the now obscure book, TTTTA.

A first hint along the way is the telestically encoded acronym, "ens."  I located this abbreviation of the USGS "Earthquake Warning System" upon having haphazardly searched "Tokyo-J1," TTTTA's fictional Japanese mother ship.  And I found a Japanese radio station, the "J1," web page that provided Japan's earthquake warning system.  Similarly, the USGS has its "Earthquake Warning System" or "ENS."

Researching the telestic encodings of 'ens' in TTTTA I find exactly 21 instances.  I find zig zags and inverted spelling ("she"), etc, but exactly 21 instances of vertically aligned 'ens' such as this one:

The line numbers of all instances of "ens" is:

Through many excited tests, I've found that the dates on which "ens" markers occur do not correlate with earthquakes on that exact date.  Failure?  Yes and maybe not.

Back to the test.  What are the greatest earthquakes of the present MOT period; 168 years spanning from June 22, 1848 to June 21, 2016?  I'm going to interpret that as "deadliest."  If nothing else, Wikipedia provides good lists so I found the list of the 52 deadliest earthquakes known.  From it, I extracted every earthquake that has occurred after June 22, 1848.

Guess what?  Of the list of all-time (recorded time that is) deadliest earthquakes there are exactly 21 earthquakes on that list:

21 instances of "ens" and the 21 deadliest earthquakes in history since beginning of the present MOT.  Coincidence?

[NOTE 4/21/2016.  The above extraction of the 52 largest earthquakes is incorrect.  For earthquakes that were pre 1900, the dates may be wrong.  Excel does not interpret dates below 1/1/1900.  For example, the 342 Antioch earthquake occurred in 342 AD but Excel interprets the 342 as December 7, 1900.  Consequently, the 'serendipity' of 21 occurrences of 'ens' and 21 earthquakes is illusory.  There may be other defects in this essay as I continue to study each earthquake.] 

Did Mr. Gann bury his 100% win rate here?  Take the first item on the list, the July 28, 1976 Tangshan earthquake.

Interesting.  You can spell "Tangshan" using the acrostic/telestic letters that are highlight in green.

Take the most recent earthquake on the list, the 5th most dangerous earthquake, the January 12, 2010 Haiti earthquake and tsunami:

Again, you can spell "Haiti" using only the telestic letters (disregard my last name appearing in zig-zag, highlighted there for another ongoing project).

But theres' more.  In the Tangshan example, there are exactly 4 acrostics and 4 telestics arranged in an apparent symmetrical configuration on either side of the date.  

And there's more with Haiti as well.  All the letters are acrostic letters and symmetrically arranged as well.  The top most letter, 'T,' is exactly 16 lines from the line on which the date appears.  The bottom most letter 'i' is exactly 16 lines from the line on which the date appears.

That symmetry...it point to an exact day, does it not?  A prediction to the day?  [I think there are some nuances to how he was forced to arrange the symmetry and maintain a good narrative.  Haiti is off 2 lines from perfectly symmetric but the "T" appears on the exact line the earthquake occurred.]

That's 2 out of 21, leaving 19 earthquakes yet to evaluate.  That's the test and I haven't completed it as yet.  If may be he did not spell the earthquake names for those appearing before the date of TTTTA, 1927.  After all, those would not have been a prediction; they'd already occurred.  There are 10 earthquakes out of 21 that occurred before 1927.  Still, I'll check them all.

If Mr. Gann spelled the 11 post 1927 earthquakes adjacent to the dates of their occurrence, I'd say he demonstrated the 100% success rate; foresight. 

I left something hanging at the phrase "yes and maybe not."  The seeming un-correlated appearance of "ens" separated from any earthquake dates is troubling.  Perhaps finding the correlation is key to understanding the mathematics of prediction..."the curve of the future."  

But first, I have 19 observations to evaluate.  You can do it too...you can download the latest version of the MOT and do it, be it success or failure, in real time.  Prove all things to yourself and cling to that which is good.  Hmmm, that sounds familiar.

Jim Ross 

ENS 2: Yellowstone; the answer, the question

I will not utter the root question nor will I recap the development of my imagined riddle that WD Gann might have posed in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  It is evident from the previous essay, from the title of this essay and from the four-letters missing from the following acrostic phrase:

I've provided above the entirety of the associated narrative that serves Mr. Gann to present a subset of statements; "NUMBER is the IF, WHY and HOW?"  My dad taught me early on there are questions one always asks him/herself in knowing the important aspects of any event or circumstance; who, what, where, when, how and why.  One of those is the question and it isn't among the above red highlighted words.

The answer was posed in yesterday's essay.  In four instances of the proximate letters forming the word "Yellowstone" there are 5 letters missing in that riddle w - on - o and n and, of those 5 letters, 3 are unique.  Of those 3 unique letters we can form three words; won, own and now.  One of them would seem the answer to the Yellowstone riddle.  And if its the answer, what then is the un-uttered question among my dad's advice for accurate description?

You get it.  Its too simple but simply saying what you mean to convey does not attract interest.  That's, in so many words, a device of Philo of Alexandria who is thought by many to have influenced writers of certain books of the Bible in their methods of enigma.

Let's take one of the three words and find it in TTTTA, if we can.  We find it once and only once in a perfect vertically and forwardly sequenced telestic word.  It is present in a poem by Benjamin F. Taylor who I believe to be the Benjamin F. Taylor found HERE.  Here's the full text of the poem:

Such a charming poem that Mr. Gann selected to place in TTTTA.  Any purpose other than to spell the word 'now' presuming the latter to be a purpose?  I find many appealing thoughts.  We bury our treasures on the Isle of Long Ago, perhaps in a book of long ago; TTTTA.  Mr. Gann buried his secrets in TTTTA.  I believe that.  And when the days of our life become night may we find the "Greenwood" (greenwood is defined as a forest green with leaves) or perhaps "Green-Wood Cemetery" (where Mr. Gann and Sadie Gann are interred) of our soul.  According to Green-Wood records I've seen, Mr. Gann did not purchase his plot at Green-Wood until the year in which Sadie passed, 1942 and fifteen years after TTTTA was published.

Other than this poem, for what is Benjamin F. Taylor known?  In the "you can't make this stuff up" category, he wrote "Between the Gates" which chronicled his 1870 trip over the Pacific Coast Railroad from Chicago to.....San Francisco.  San Francisco, my "great mistake."

"Now" is a point in a never ending, rhythmic, ebb and flow of the river of time.  It is where we are in the River Time.  We are in "now." We are in the age of the 266th Pope when Mr. Gann has told us point blank we, our generation, are to expect "remarkable events."

Moving on, "now" is still not very specific.  Could be this moment, could be our lifetime within the eons, could be this year.  So I thought about the Yellowstone and "now."  The Yellowstone Caldera was formed, according to likely the most frequently viewed estimate at Wikipedia (not necessarily the most accurate), 630,000 years ago.  That's the number you find HERE.  Don't worry, I'm getting to the point.

You know how much I like the Biblical interval of 2,520 years.  It comes from Thomas Towards "Biblical Prophecy....," it is tenfold John Dee's "philosopher stone number" in his Monas Heiroglyhica (John Dee is found telestically encoded in TTTTA as "Dee" 45 times and once as his pen name with Queen Elizabeth I as "007") which is the number 252...  2,520 is an important number.  

The Biblical Great Week of 2520 or a spiritual circle...360 degrees.

 Three numbers 630,000, 2520 and 360.  What can I make of that?

It startled me when last night, halfway asleep that it occurred to me 630,000 divided by 2520 is a perfect whole number 250.  I turned on the light and grabbed the iPhone.  How improbable is that?  250.0000 or 2.500000, a number with interesting geometric properties as I distantly recall.

And then I realized that 360 divided by 250 is 1.4400000 or, ignoring the decimal as Mr. Gann often did, 144.  The square of 12, a number of immense gravitas in Mr. Gann's thoughts and in Biblical numbers.  How improbable is that?

Bottom line.  2016 is exactly 250 Great Weeks from the last great eruption of the Yellowstone Caldera and 69% (250/360 or 69, the time key to the "6th Prophecy of 9/11") of a circle in time.  It is where we are "now" relative to "then."

Not predicting.  Not proving.  "Just saying."

Still, this year (this MOT year ends with the June 21, 2016 solstice) is not very specific...but there's not a lot of time left.  I'll try to do better but there are only so many hours in the day and so many days left in the year (63).

Its yours to call.

Jim Ross

ENS 1: Yellowstone

Since my "great mistake" I've avoided prediction.  Its hard to ignore current events even if they aren't found, as I'd wish them to be, as predictions by WD Gann in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  Certainly, I nor anyone would wishes any such events but if they're going to happen, wouldn't it be better to know when?  The often cited Page 84 of TTTTA:

My reputation unfortunately preceding me, at least as it is apparent to me, I'll live up to Mr. Gann's prediction of me.  After all, he did associate one of my names for the acronym of the USGS "Earthquake Notification Service" or ENS.  From page 75, we find my name "Jimi" adjacent to "ENS:"

In evaluating "The Bible Code" the chief criticism is that messages are not found close enough together to assure the messages are intended.  Say we find in the Torah the message, according to the math of the code, "JFK shot 1963."  Well, if those words are encoded on the same page along with "Oswald," well, that's pretty stimulating.  If all 4 words are tens of pages apart, well, not so much.  Statistical evaluations of "The Bible Code" have used "cylinder" statistical technique to determine if the proximity of words in a proposed message are close enough to warrant their being considered a message.  If so, did they or did they not come true?

The three words above, seem pretty close to me.  Well, the zig zag spelling of my last name isn't a clean acrostic or telestic and, absent the "Jimi" and "ens" I'd disregard it.  But its close.  And all three words are close.  And two are pretty clear.

With that background and the many recent +7M earthquakes (Indonesia, Japan, Vanuatu and Equador), my interest is piqued.  I find 22 instances of "ens" which I presently believe are associated with events before the halfway point of the MOT or June 22, 1932).   And I find 19 instances of "sne" in TTTTA which I presently believe are associated with events that have occurred in the second half of the MOT or since June 22, 1932.  I say "presently" first because of my "great error" in interpreting Mr. Gann's messages.  And second because I have not been able to correlate the dates of the total 41 implied seismic events with the date they actually occurred; if they did.  I failed but that hardly stops me from trying to figure out what Mr. Gann wants said.  

22 pre June 22, 1932 events and 19 post June 22, 1932.  Would implied symmetry mean there are 2 events yet to occur before the second half of the 168-year MOT period ends on June 22, 2016?  

There's one last current event that hasn't happened but is a topic of ongoing discussion, rumors, black helicopter myth;  Yellowstone, the super volcano.  Some time ago I wrote about it and the scenarios.  They aren't good.  Here's an article written in the last week of the same bent.

Did Mr. Gann encode anything about Yellowstone?  As you can imagine, encoding "Jimi," "Ross" or "ens" without a ready catching it is pretty easy.  All those acrostic and telestic messages I've found haven't been found (to my awareness) in the 88 years since TTTTA was written.  Event if someone saw a 3 or 4 letter word they'd write it off as "random."  But "Yellowstone."  How could that be encoded in contiguous letters and not be painfully obvious.  So, Mr. Gann didn't, well, perhaps:

I found three suspicious instances above.  There may be more; the process of searching the acrostic and telestic letters is entirely grunt work and subject to errors due to it tedium.  The result; an 11-letter word spelled 3 times lacking 1 letter two times and 2 letters 1 time.  The proximity of the letters according to my best amateur attempt at subjective "cylinder" analysis; pretty close.  

One last instance with even less cylinder proximity and not in the class at the above....but a very meaningful narrative:

I just don't know.   But I find it interesting that this essay began with a passage from page 84 in the first insert and end on the next previous page 83.  I did not plan that but find the poetic impact ....interesting.  To say the least.

Oh, did I forget?  There's been an earthquake "swarm" reported April 18 at Lake Hebgen, 13 miles from Yellowstone.

And, those four missing letters in the first three supposed spellings of Yellowstone. Can you find the 3-letter words (I see two of them) made of those 4 letters.  Those letters are w-on-o.  Won is easy, you see it already ordered in the previous sentence.

What are other 3-letter words that can be spelled with the letters w - o - n - o? 

Does one of them answer another question that I refuse to ask?

I just don't know.

Jim Ross

Measurement

Bear with me, I intend to circle back to WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

I fired my MD when I observed his staff observing my blood pressure.  After walking a mile to my doctor's office for my 8am (first appointment of the day), the nurse promptly brought me to the observation station took my weight (borderline normal/overweight), height and blood pressure.  And after a brief wait in the examining room the doctor was with me at 8:10.  Successful you might think; that I did not have to wait.  Wrong.

Measurement.  The staff of that "Medicare doctor," (I was not on Medicare, I'd selected him based entirely on reputation), and I call him such because he takes MC patients and for a point I'll make later, did it all wrong.  I'll not go back and reproduce my personal research, but the standard for blood pressure measurement was created decades ago based on a methodology that does not occur in the MD's office.  Its tragic.  In the establishing studies, the participant, not having exercised or eaten in the previous hour, was led into a comfortable, dimly lit room that was without distractions and allowed to sit and rest for 15 minutes.  Then, with arms resting at heart level on a table in front of them, feet flat on the floor and erect in a backed chair, the blood pressure was taken.  From that procedure came the metric of 120/80 or so (my best recollection).

That's a far cry from sitting in an armed chair, no table, with less than a couple minute's rest from walking from home into the observation point with bright light and staff walking around.  Measurement of blood pressure; with weight and height the starting point of classifying any patient's health.  Think of a diagnosis as a graphic tree of alternatives....the beginning of that tree from which differentials are elected, is weight, height and blood pressure.

There are other aspects of blood pressure measurement to consider.  For example "white coat syndrome, where many patient's blood pressure rises in the stressful situation of being in the doctor's office.  I confidently assume,  MDs are unaware of these defects in their own measurements.  And yet, they take them.  Perhaps its their need to make their sessions the insurance company and Medicare mandated 10 minute visit (or whatever the cost effectiveness standard might be) or perhaps its just the way its done everywhere; "best practices."

Everywhere?  So I replaced my doctor with another which my neighbors use.  He's non Medicare, out of pocket.  My first and last visit.  I walked the mile to his office and, disappointedly, got the 2 minute blood pressure routine, saw the doctor for a pleasant and informative one-hour background chat and blood draw, and walked back home.

I get a call a week later and the nurse gives me a prescription for a mild statin saying "Your LDL is high at 175 and we need to get it down to a more acceptable level.  And we need to increase your exercise level."  What the hell did she know about my exercise?  She presumed that my supposed high LDL (which under previous decades' standards was normal) would be improved by exercise.  Did she consider my 5 miles of personal walking every day?  Did she consider that, up until two years ago I'd been running "a 5k a day to keep the doctors away and stopped because of osteoarthritis pain?"  And then could run a 5k in 30 minutes?  A 62 year old running a 3.13 mile track in an average of less than 10 minutes?  Kenneth Cooper MD, celebrated author of a definitive 1970s study of exercise and health, "Aerobics," would, I believe, be ecstatic with my cardio vascular condition.  [FYI, my resting heart rate when running two years ago was 45 and is now mid 50s and I've never been informed of any EKG abnormality or audio notation of such.]

That nurse may have misdiagnosed my condition by starting with the diagnosis and wrongfully inferring the condition (lack of exercise was simply a false conclusion).  [I have a big problem with statin research but that's another diatribe, entirely.]

I fired the second doctor, not because of the above, but because I simply have a different philosophy on measurement and inference.  I intend on re entering the medical treatment world with a cheep'o (Medicare) youngster general practitioner at the nearby and well respected hospital (also a one-mile walk) only to have those same studies taken that I can consider....and have "access" when the inevitable of all of our lives does occur.  At that time, I'll let them do the best they can.

From TTTTA, following is one of eight meaningful commentaries you find by searching "measur_" and this one is page 59 from Ezekiel 43:4, 10:

Measure the pattern for sure.  Perhaps by "whose prospect is toward the east" means the sun which emerges from the east, e.g. days and years?  Perhaps "in the house of Israel" means the fate that befell Israel?

My main point in considering the process of "measurement" is associating what you "think" is happening (high blood pressure) with what is causing what you think is occurring.  If your measurement process or metric or variable is wrong, what's the probability the conclusion will be right?

Might Mr. Gann have instructed us on how to measure and what measurement to use?  So I searched TTTTA on "measur_," purposefully dropping the "e" so I could capture any instances of the noun, "measure" and the verb "measuring."  When I read each of the 8 "hits" on "measur_" I feel like I derive an upstanding of, at least, the metrics of measurement and the variables (cycles or repetition) Mr. Gann intended.

While studying blood pressure measurement today, I noted one comment that gave me a chuckle:

Fret not, I believe correctly measured high blood pressure (particularly night time "no-dip") indicates a problem and I agree with the lipid theory of CVD.  I do believe the doctors I fired were smart persons who were genuinely concerned for my health.  I don't agree measurements are being taken correctly nor are independent (causal) variables being properly measured and treated.  And from a bad diagnosis may come treatment worse than the ill.

While I can (as age diminishes), I will take charge of my health and my study.  I will trust the primary sources of knowledge and those who I believe have real knowledge.  Personally, I've selected WD Gann, not the many experts clinging to his record.  And...

First, do no harm.

Jim Ross

A couple "I kid you nots"

I have a discovery in the "Divine Plan" series, but its going to have to wait.  So often I'll see things that simply floor me.  There were two that came my way yesterday/today via a commenter to this blog, Steve.

It began with some incredible research by an Internet presence, Super_Romeman, who maintains the 'gannstudygroup' at gmail.  His contribution to research into WD Gann dwarfs the many experts who have, as they market their work, "have discovered the secret."  And the results of his work are factual; they aren't perverted by the hucksters or the excessively imaginative (me).  You can take his work to the bank.  I doubt SR wants the accolades or wishes to be associated with my "out there" thoughts and, if he wishes, I will take it down.

Without his work, I would not have been down the road of the WD Gann "Map of Time" because it was his public Word file of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" that I adapted (by adding page heading/page number lines and line spacing) to create the MOT.  The MOT, based upon the 168-year MOT period, 1/15th of the Biblical Great Year of 2520 years....168.  42 sections to the TTTTA as opposed to 36 chapters as originally numbered which, when "doubled" and "redoubled" as advised by "tidbits" on page 45 gives you....168.  168, the number of hours in the week.

Get my drift?  ....168....  Remember that number.

I kid you not #1.  So yesterday, Super_Rome presented his finding of a 1907 book written, "Therapeutics of Vibration" (TOV) by Wm. Lawrence Woodruff, MD, who wrote on page 7:

Very similar to WD Gann's few citations of the "great law of vibration" (LOV)  I will provide just one from TTTTA:

I selected the above as opposed to the few other times Mr. Gann referred to the LOV because it appears in the target of my research, TTTTA.  AND because it appears on page 77.  That perks me up.  That's the first "I kid you not" and it means nothing.  But, as always, inspires my interest.

I kid you not #2.  At the point when Steve gave me a heads up, I hadn't read or even downloaded Dr. Woodruff's book.  His heads up; "count the pages."  I'll warn you, there's a difference between or, I'd prefer, a nuance in how I've counted the 432 pages in TTTTA; in TTTTA I counted all the way to the rear dust jacket but with Woodruff's book I counted only to the last printing that appears.  In both cases I count to the last printed word but in TTTTA that includes the rear cover where in TOV there are several pages after the last printed word.

What's the big deal?  When you go to the very last page that doesn't include any printing, the page reader tells you that you're on the 175th page.  But when you flip back to the last word you see in the book...you are on page 168.  

I kinda like this "kid you not."

I kid you not #3.  What's on the 168th and final printed page?  I'll preempt the thought and provide side by side pages of the nature this "kid you not."

Lots of "kid you nots" here.  First, Luo Clement on the right promised a book "Numerical Vibrations" that, despite many hours devoted by several qualified researchers, was never found documented as being published.  Can anyone find either of the books Dr. Woodruff promised?  I haven't devoted any more than a couple minutes as his obscure writings might be argued so obscure that the Internet has not found his other writings.  I'll give the non publishing of both these announced books one half a "kid you not" and wouldn't be surprised to be proven wrong.

Continuing, that similarly obscure Roger Brothers who published Luo's book; 82 Duane Street.  I was never able to find a Roger Brothers therein located.  I found a stationary business.  As well, Roger Brothers published very few books, most of which seemed to be along the lines of Mr. Gann's spiritual and philosophical orientation.  I've personally considered the Roger Brothers 18 or so books WD Gann's secret reading list; not simply a list of books for sale.

So what about J.F. Elwell Publishing Company; how many books did they publish?  Again a quick search and I find one; TOV.  Not exactly prolific.  Maybe they were as obscure as TOV and missed the wide net of Internet search.  What about 247 S. Broadway, Los Angeles.  I find only one occupant:

Per "A History of the Chamber of Commerce from 1988 to 1900" a furrier was located at 247 S. Broadway.  I can't find any other business there located but did find David Bonoff, furrier, that apparently owned a chunk of LA.  Later in Los Angeles Herald, November 1990 I find Mr. Bonoff at that location:

I expect the furrier could have moved or liquidated after 1900 and before 1907 and J.F. Elwell Publishing might have set up shop to publish one book in 1907.

Stop the press, I find a second book located in the Internet archives of the University of California which is a biography of the Rev. J. W. T. McNeil by Mary Carr Merritt published in 1909.  Maybe there are more, but I'm not finding them.  And, judging from the content of both books, while admirable, neither was a best seller.

All considered, this is a weak "I kid you not" that might be disproven.

I kid you not #4.  This is the big one.  I discovered the MOT (as if it were proven "prophecy") based upon a similar method I found in a contemporary fictional work.  The character in that work, examining a page of numbers, found a sequence that correlated the date of 9/11/2001 with then number of deaths that day.  On that flimsiest of thought, I added dates to my Excel copy of TTTTA and found that the date 9/11/2001 aligned perfectly with 2997, the number of innocent deaths that day.  I discovered this on 9/11/2015 and wrote an essay to monument it.  Here's what I saw that day:

The date 9/11/2001 on the right, the numbers 2693 and 283 on the left adding to 2976.  One off you say.  Well, there are two dates on each line and the left numbers increment at a rate of 2 per line.  9/11/2001 would, by math, correlate with 2977.  The MOT has changed radically since that 2015 essay but September 11, 2001 still correlates with the number of deaths.

What's the "kid you not?"  Steve told me to take the date 9/11/2001, subtract 168 lines, and research what happened on the lines of that day.  Here's what you find in the most recent formulation of the MOT (again, the line numbers have changed so you can't take 2693 minus 168 by you can download the MOT and work from the updated MOT as I have):

The yellow highlighted date appears exactly 168 lines below line number 2699 on which is located the date 9/11/2001 (if you include the beginning and ending date).  

And what happened on October 12, 2000?  The Islamic terrorist attack on the U.S.S. Cole.

I kid you not.

*******

That fictional work in which the character found the number of innocent deaths on 9/11/2001.  He also found the major disasters that occurred in the world between the time the page of numbers was created on October 13, 1959 to the time he discovered the correlation on October 13, 2009.  

Did Mr. Gann document every yet to occur disaster between 1927 and the end of the MOT?  I find the acrostic/telestic messages in TTTTA that infer such is the case.  I cannot figure out the consistent math and time relation that I know is there as well which will predict the dates of those disasters.  

If I do of someone does, it will answer the cosmic question well posed (which I've previously provided):

Oh, who co wrote and directed "Knowing?"  Ryne Douglas Pearson.  Is he encoded in TTTTA.  Yes.  Find that bloviating essay HERE.

I kid you not.

Jim Ross

Earthquakes today

Recall my error in interpreting WD Gann's encoded messages found in "The Tunnel Thru the Air;" a catastrophic earthquake for about February 23, 2016.  The largest California earthquake of 2016 did occur on that day Wasco (about 1 hour south of San Francisco and 2 northwest of LA) but, at 4.9M, did not cause an substantial damage and was hardly noticeable in SF or LA.

I was wrong in my interpretation of Mr. Gann's work.  However, there are two components on the error; the what and the when.  On the former, I haven't any doubt;  Southern California and, ultimately, much greater.  There are very deep and unconvincing (or is that inconclusive) encoded messages concerning the Cascadia subduction (from about 200 miles north of San Francisco to deep into northern Canada) and Yellowstone.  On the latter, I haven't any opinion but on the former, Southern California, I am convinced Mr. Gann was giving a warning to our generation.

On the "when," my primary suspicion of February 23, 2016 is toast.  I find, again, unconvincing clues that May 9 (the first date in the book and one which has other significance) might be noteworthy and October 19, 2016 as well.

The "where" without the "when;" about what you get from the market crash experts.  In the expanse of time, you'll ultimately get it right.

So last week, yesterday and today there have been numerous large earthquakes in Burma, Japan and Vanuatu.  You can get the latest 24-hour US and world USGS earthquake map at HERE.

As well, last week a friend emailed me a news story on Yellowstone's USGS public seismic feeds being taken off-line.  In response to my email to the USGS Yellowstone website, the listed lead scientist actually responded to my inquiry, completely and credibly pooh poohing the rumor that there was an ulterior motive to the public seismic feed discontinuance.  He really took a lot of time with me as if I were important.  Wow, what is a government to do if the prudent thing to do is to evacuate every person within 500 miles of Yellowstone on a heightened projection of a seismic event?

Now a week later there seems to be other things "going on" and one was picked up by New York Superstation95.  For one, a volcanic steam vent has opened up below a Yellowstone river.  As well, I've been watching the USGS Yellowstone and University of Utah monitoring sites and it seems there's been an uptick in earthquakes.  I haven't quantified that; it just appears that way.  These are very very minor tremors. But in a super volcano zone, if true, it wouldn't seem to be a "good thing."

I'll add one more site to the above 3; Michael Janitch.  He's a loose cannon who thinks he's got a feel for the way seismic activity propagates from west to east across the world.  From what he's demonstrated in his videos, he seems to have an instinctive, if not factual, basis for his work.  I sympathize with all the loose cannons out there.  So, if there's a sizable Pacific Ocean event

I haven't a clue if any of the above is significant nor am I concentrating anything other than idle time (when I'm not working on TTTTA) in the pursuit.  If you're interested, above are 4 links to good real-time information.  I am, however, happily living on the east rather than west coast.

Jim Ross

The "Divine Plan;" the Kepler triangle and the outer and inner square and circle, part 2

Working with thoughts of the previous essay that connects, in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air, the "divine plan" of the pyramids to the outer and inner circle and square and the Kepler triangle, I decided I needed to go through the exercise of "squaring the circle."  The Kepler triangle is the only triangle dimension that can perform this task (the squaring is an approximation as pi is a transcendental number).  In my exercise, I created it according to the dimension of a 19 X 19 square to show the similarity to certain of the recovered square devices attributed to Mr. Gann and to researchers who have attempted to re create the device (most notably, the "square of 9" device).

First it would be good to reproduce Mr. Gann's outer and inner square and circle comment just to focus suggests a riddle:

Here's my rendition of the squaring of the circle via the Kepler triangle showing only the "outer circle" and "outer square:"

An alternate meaning of the the outer circle and square would have the square fully enclosed in the circle with only the four points of the square touching the circle.  That presentation, with the further enclosed inner circle and inner square gives us square root of 2 growth mathematics (see Bradley Cowan's "Four Dimensional Stock Market Structures and Cycles," page 45).  [Hmmm, page 45 in Four D.  TTTTA's Page 45, "tidbits" gives us the "double" and "redouble" inferring 90 just as the circle is halved, halved and re halved to ultimately arrive at the important 45.]  

Here's my rendition of that growth relation (sqrt(2) between the the outer circle, outer square and inner circle:

Don't make the mistake of thinking the triangle in the immediately above is the same one as that in the first illustration; it is not.  I was floored when the hypotenuse of triangle ABC was sqrt(3), which otherwise is the measure of the diagonal of the 1X1 cube.

When I look at that last illustration and specifically the inner circle within the outer circle, I recall the many essays I wrote on "Robert Gordon's Seven Days."  In six days he traveled once around the earth in exactly six days and having completed that circumnavigation on exactly the sixth day when he arrived at Montreal.  And on the seventh day, he rested, taking a leisurely 5 hour return from Montreal to New York.  

During that trip, he traveled a total of 33,543 miles, of which he traveled east/west 18,213 miles and north/south 18,495; reminiscent of an isosceles triangle.  If you think about it, Robert Gordon's east/west distance of 18,213 miles of the trip are the circumference of the earth at just below latitude 41 degrees; the latitude of New York City.  That would be the inner circle.  And the outer circle would be the circumference of the earth at the equator or 24,901 miles.  [Hmmm, and distance as a proportionate proxy for time as it you can say 24 hours is denominated in either 18,213 or 24901 miles depending on the latitude.]

I look down on that second insert above and extend a mind exercise I've read regarding Mr. Gann's square of nine device without the circles.  Instead this time, the circles are there.  I'm looking down from the north pole on the entire earth but superimposed is a square that maps spacial points on the earth....or spacial squares on the Great Pyramid from overhead.  

That second insert is a two dimensional image depicting a three dimensional view; it is a two-dimensional image that may represent a calculator, perhaps, that relates time (the circles) to space (either on the surface of the earth or a stock chart).   

Let me amend that.  A two dimensional image that depicts four dimensions; height, width, depth AND time.  "....which prove the fourth dimension is working in market movements."

If only I could envision the math and geometry that will recreate that mathematic proof of which Mr. Gann spoke.

Jim Ross

Note and comment.  Please correct me on the math as the "Rossups" are inevitable.  Isn't it funny how things emerge.  I created the above spreadsheets by first sizing the cells in Excel to create uniform squares; the default was .21" and I doubled it to get to .42" X .42."  And how many "sections" are found in TTTTA...42 sections.  How many hours in the week?  42X4.  How many years in a "Map of Time" period?  42X4.  So, I'm encouraged when I read page 42 of TTTTA, "It Can Be Done."