Monday, April 18, 2016

ENS 1: Yellowstone

Since my "great mistake" I've avoided prediction.  Its hard to ignore current events even if they aren't found, as I'd wish them to be, as predictions by WD Gann in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  Certainly, I nor anyone would wishes any such events but if they're going to happen, wouldn't it be better to know when?  The often cited Page 84 of TTTTA:


My reputation unfortunately preceding me, at least as it is apparent to me, I'll live up to Mr. Gann's prediction of me.  After all, he did associate one of my names for the acronym of the USGS "Earthquake Notification Service" or ENS.  From page 75, we find my name "Jimi" adjacent to "ENS:"

In evaluating "The Bible Code" the chief criticism is that messages are not found close enough together to assure the messages are intended.  Say we find in the Torah the message, according to the math of the code, "JFK shot 1963."  Well, if those words are encoded on the same page along with "Oswald," well, that's pretty stimulating.  If all 4 words are tens of pages apart, well, not so much.  Statistical evaluations of "The Bible Code" have used "cylinder" statistical technique to determine if the proximity of words in a proposed message are close enough to warrant their being considered a message.  If so, did they or did they not come true?

The three words above, seem pretty close to me.  Well, the zig zag spelling of my last name isn't a clean acrostic or telestic and, absent the "Jimi" and "ens" I'd disregard it.  But its close.  And all three words are close.  And two are pretty clear.

With that background and the many recent +7M earthquakes (Indonesia, Japan, Vanuatu and Equador), my interest is piqued.  I find 22 instances of "ens" which I presently believe are associated with events before the halfway point of the MOT or June 22, 1932).   And I find 19 instances of "sne" in TTTTA which I presently believe are associated with events that have occurred in the second half of the MOT or since June 22, 1932.  I say "presently" first because of my "great error" in interpreting Mr. Gann's messages.  And second because I have not been able to correlate the dates of the total 41 implied seismic events with the date they actually occurred; if they did.  I failed but that hardly stops me from trying to figure out what Mr. Gann wants said.  

22 pre June 22, 1932 events and 19 post June 22, 1932.  Would implied symmetry mean there are 2 events yet to occur before the second half of the 168-year MOT period ends on June 22, 2016?  

There's one last current event that hasn't happened but is a topic of ongoing discussion, rumors, black helicopter myth;  Yellowstone, the super volcano.  Some time ago I wrote about it and the scenarios.  They aren't good.  Here's an article written in the last week of the same bent.

Did Mr. Gann encode anything about Yellowstone?  As you can imagine, encoding "Jimi," "Ross" or "ens" without a ready catching it is pretty easy.  All those acrostic and telestic messages I've found haven't been found (to my awareness) in the 88 years since TTTTA was written.  Event if someone saw a 3 or 4 letter word they'd write it off as "random."  But "Yellowstone."  How could that be encoded in contiguous letters and not be painfully obvious.  So, Mr. Gann didn't, well, perhaps:


I found three suspicious instances above.  There may be more; the process of searching the acrostic and telestic letters is entirely grunt work and subject to errors due to it tedium.  The result; an 11-letter word spelled 3 times lacking 1 letter two times and 2 letters 1 time.  The proximity of the letters according to my best amateur attempt at subjective "cylinder" analysis; pretty close.  

One last instance with even less cylinder proximity and not in the class at the above....but a very meaningful narrative:


I just don't know.   But I find it interesting that this essay began with a passage from page 84 in the first insert and end on the next previous page 83.  I did not plan that but find the poetic impact ....interesting.  To say the least.

Oh, did I forget?  There's been an earthquake "swarm" reported April 18 at Lake Hebgen, 13 miles from Yellowstone.

And, those four missing letters in the first three supposed spellings of Yellowstone. Can you find the 3-letter words (I see two of them) made of those 4 letters.  Those letters are w-on-o.  Won is easy, you see it already ordered in the previous sentence.

What are other 3-letter words that can be spelled with the letters w - o - n - o? 

Does one of them answer another question that I refuse to ask?

I just don't know.

Jim Ross

2 comments:

  1. Hi Jim!

    Some annagramming at page 83 big para:
    From a/t: "TseutiMiGc" + "yloeeedless" ->

    1. "Guess Telestic Model yel" (note "GTM" - the only uppercased letters within the a/t)
    2. "eedless" -> "needless" = same missing "n" as for your "yellowstone" (coincidence?).

    I suggest you widen the range upwards to include page 82, then you get the "n" and some more a/t messages.

    Up to one whole chapter for annagramming makes sense to me.

    telestic = related to a hierophant
    hierophant = greek high priest | a person who relates to mysteries

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good morning,

      "Guess telestic model," that is simply incredible. Generally, the telestic messages are more "markers" of events and/or time that define a mathematic model. "ens" "tws" "red" "ten" "tao" "aot" and many others mark events. "ttt" "eee" "sss" and so on mark cycles. But I can't claim the conclusion that they do without the exact sequence/arrangement... not until I am able to correlate the event with the cycle...to nearly (as my line definition could be off 1 or 2 lines) the day.

      You've identified, in an anagram, exactly what I think I'm trying to do.

      Thank you for that and for coloring the definition of "telestic." Many months (now a couple years ago) I had a hard time understanding just the rudiment of telestic when I first encountered it in Petter Amundsen's decoding in the Stratford controversy. And you are right; I am intimately attracted to this mystery.

      Pages 82, 83 and 84 are, in the context of my inquiry, monumentally important. They are Mr. Gann's message to our generation in words everyone can understand. They deserve many readings for understanding. In my present view, I perceive my inquiry as only adding detail to the "when."

      I wish I had your talent for anagram perception. I guess I think in numbers too conveniently.

      Again, thank you for sharing your knowledge and discovery,

      Jim

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.