The Sequel; Planets, Law of 3 and Law of 7

In the previous post one orbit of the 9 planets becomes a progression comprised of 3 and an exponential progression of 2.  Take it a step farther and look at theosophical addition of that series and see if the Law of 7 has a relation to that progression.

First, look at how that Law of 3 table of theoretic planetary orbits reduces to a single digit number.

Interesting, 3.6.3.6.3.6.3.6…..

So where does the Law of 7 fit in, or should it?  So, let's take the Implied Planetary Orbit above (which comports with actual planetary orbits) and divide them by 7….and since I already know where I'm going, multiply them by Phi^2 and do some fudging.

So, when we multiply by Phi^2 we get a series that looks like what you'd get if you started with 8.98 rounded to 9 and then multiplied that 9 by 2 (doubled as in octave) a series of times.  And what would be the theosophic reduction of each of those numbers beginning at 9?  It would be 9.9.9.9.9….

Those numbers in the not so badly "Fudged" column…..see anything notable?  Kinda a 'who's who' list of Gann favorites.

And this doubling thang as in G's 'Do.Re.Me.Fa.So.La.Si.Do'……..

Could someone have used mathematic rules to construct the universe?  

I didn't know any of that stuff as of last night.  So cool, IMO.

Jim  

I Didn't Know that; Planets and the Law of 3

Did you know how neatly the sum of the days all planets take to orbit the Sun, 196,324.8, breaks down into a function of 3 and the squaring of 2?  I used my trusty ephemeris myself to find the average orbit of the 9 planets to derive 196,324.8 ('verify all things):

In other words, divide 196,324.8 by 2 a succession of times until you arrive at 3.  

Then I used 3 and 2 raised to successive exponents to recreate the progression and imply that the true number of days it takes (because I used average orbits and my ephemeris could only calculate 1 orbit of Pluto, etc) is really 196,608.

Some memorable numbers in that harmonic (doubling/halving, as in the octave) progression from nothing to 196,608.  

Law of 3?  So where's the subordinate Law of 7?  Where's G when I need him?  [I feel a sequel coming on.]

Jim

Smith, Ouspensky and Gurdjieffe

My best interpretation of Russell Smith's 'Cosmic Secrets' / Ouspensky / Gurdjieffe applied to our position in the age since the Crucifixion.

From nothing to all 0AD to 3072AD (Smith's 1536 octave X 2) I find our present inner octave to be 2004 to 2016.  Within that octave I find the system needed energy from INSIDE the system in the period of 2007-08 (pink shaded area #1) or otherwise the ascension would become deterioration.  Within that period (2008) the US government and Federal Reserve undertook massive monetary and fiscal measures and the decline was arrested and reversed.  

Which brings us to the second retardation zone (red area #2) which begins in the middle of 2014.  The ascension of society in the ti do area of 2014.5 to 2016 requires force/energy from outside the system. Perhaps this is where Jonathan Cahn's "The Harbinger" has relevance?  Will 'The Absolute' afford society the force/energy to continue its progress or will society enter a period of octave descension?

In Gurdjieffe's scale of personal attainment, I consider myself an emerging 5 so, be appropriately forewarned.

Jim

More WD Gann irrelevance

Recall Mr. Gann's misspelling of the "Mammouth Building" in Tunnel Thru the Air and how it might be correlated with the World Trade Center:

http://markettimeandpricetownhall.blogspot.com/2014/06/file-this-under-irrelevant-but.html

And the proposition that, perhaps, WD Gann was speaking to generations later than the 1928-32 era.  I'm unable to otherwise explain how Gann would have been so mistaken as to reference the 266th Pope who would not be elected until 2013.  Some say his sole purpose was to introduce the number 266 and accepted the incorrect chronology.

Another strategic misspelling?

Tokio.  Misspelling of Japan would be too obvious.  Misspelling Hiroshima or Nagasaki might never be recognized.  But Tokio?  [Super_romeman corrects the above in that Tokio was an accepted spelling in Gann's era.  At the same time, Gann used the alternate spelling 2 times out of a total of 13 references to that city.  The distinct inconsistency remains apparent.  Thanks SR.]

Two occurrences of the misspelling as in 2 atomic bombs on August 6, 1945?

Pg 336 Mammouth (sp?) Building....how big would that be?  110 stories / 42nd St = 2.619

Mammouth anchored to 10/15/1931, 66 cycles of Phi^2 moves 172.788* to August 7, 1945.  

And what was the hero, Robert Gordon doing in relation to "Tokio?"  He was traveling around the world in a campaign to destroy buildings and armament of the enemies of the US in their greatest cities.

Nahhh

Jim

Can WD Gann spell or did he know something about 9/11? [Irrelevant but interesting]

Interesting that Robert Gordon, the Supreme Commander and hero in WD Gann’s Tunnel Thru The Air (1927) would repel 4 waves of enemy planes from the 110th floor of the the Mammouth Building (16 letters, Pythagorean 74) on August 30, 1932.  Some 69 years later two planes of four were used to destroy the 110 story World Trade Center (16 letters, Pythagorean 77).  Of course, there were 2 other waves of planes, one failing and one damaging the Pentagon.

Some interesting time intervals in the lives of the Mammouth Building (actual spelling would be Mammoth) and World Trade Center:

[All WTC dates are per Wikipedia.]

Here's some numerology according to the method Awodele reverse engineered from Gann's calculation of the number '28' for Thomas Woodrow Wilson.

The Gregorius/Sepharial date of the Mammouth (we do not have an actual birth date even though Broadway and 42nd Street was, apparently, a theatrical building), the 8/30/1932 date would be the 7th degree of the 6th sign or 7+6=13.  If this calc is correct, the "number" of the Mammouth Building would be the name number of 74 plus the date number of 13 or 87.  The WTC groundbreaking on 8/25/1966 would represent the 2nd degree of the sixth sign or 5+6=11.  The "Number" for the WTC would be 77+11=88.  87 and 88.  Not sure what that proves or doesn't.  Where's Mercury when you need a clue?

Maybe reduce the Mammouth Building from 87 to 8+7=15 and further reduce it to 6.  Reduce the WTC from 88 to 8+8=16 and further to 7.  6 days and then 7 days.  Perhaps some Biblical symbolism?  Not a clue here.

If one were to create a chart of the WTC you'd find 2001 on the unfortunate 45* angle from the date of ground breaking (1966).

Hmmm, two M's aligned (one vertically and one horizontally) with 2001 in the Mammouth name and two R's in the WTC name aligned with 2001.

Errrr, Mr. Gann, did you misspell "Mammouth" eight different times in TTTA or did you add an extra U in order that it would be 16 letters?  Perhaps the spelling was as portrayed back in the early 1900s; I don't know.  Barring that, didn't they have spell check in 1927 when you wrote TTTA?  So, Mr. Gann, what did you know and when did you know it?

Jim

Gann, the 266th Pope and numerology (revisited)

On page 82 of “Tunnel Thru the Air” WD Gann speaks of the 266^th Pope in a very curious passage referring to St Malachy's prophecy of future Popes.  Most of what I’ve read regarding that passage concerned the obvious importance of the number ‘266’.

2 * 6 * 6:

• 2 X 6=12 , 12 divisions of the circle
•  2X 6 X 6=72 or the pentagon.  Didn't someone write a book on that?  Bradley Cowan?
• (6X6) / 2=18 and 2X6+6=18
• 6 / 6 / 2 = .5
• 2+6+6=14 reduced to 5 

Can there be any doubt that Mr. Gann intended to emphasize many permutations of 266? Was the 266th Pope just a convenient forum to bring up an important number?  But maybe an important meaning might be the simplest explanation? Occam's razor.  Look at the first sentence of that paragraph, pg 82 TTTA.

"Some evidence of long-range predictions which have been fulfilled that has attracted attention, appeared in the New York American, January 29, 1922." pg 82

Maybe he was also talking about what he said he was talking about; duh, long range predictions.  And the long range predictions are St Malachy's prophecy (which, by some, are thought to have been authored by Nostradamus).  Not 2 or 3 years in the future, decades and centuries in the future.  And yet, Gann extrapolates the long range predictions to an evil period of only 1926 to 1932?  Really?

To be sure, Gann makes mistakes, but what is the likelihood that he accidentally mistook the 266th pope to be elected in the 1926-32 era?  And after having read the New York American article he cited in the first sentence?  Pope Pius XI (1922-39) was the 259th.  Implausible.  Gann knew the 266th Pope would be elected decades thereafter.  Perhaps Gann  knew or extrapolated in which repeating cycle the 266th pope would be elected?

"To those who understand numbers, "266" reveals some remarkable events that are to follow the election of the new Pope. It shows that wars are not yet over and that Europe will have troublesome conditions, and in fact, the entire world must yet pass thru a very evil period between 1926 and 1932. It also confirms both the major and minor cycles which indicate that the years 1928 and 1930 to 1932 are to be years of famine, depressing business conditions and panic, not only in Europe, but in the United States. The maximum evil of the great 1000-year cycle, which will not be completed until 1932 to 1934, will bring serious troubles to the United States. Another bad period for the United States will be 1940 to 1944." pg 82

The maximum evil of the great 1000-year cycle.  

"He had figured out from the Bible that a time of trouble such as the world had never seen would begin in 1927, and would continue until 1932. There would be war, famine and pestilence all over the earth, and that except the time be shortened every human being on the face of the earth would be destroyed according to the Bible.' pg 41

So the greatest evil of the 1000-year cycle would not occur in the 1927-1932 period. The world would not be destroyed because there was not enough time in the 1926-32 cycle.  [Interesting that Bradley Cowan places the end of the 1914-1933 Pentagonal Uranian cycle as 1933.]  When might greater evil occur?

A problem in all this is who is Pope is the 266th.  Some count Pope Francis as the 266th, some count him as the 268th (counting antipopes).  Perhaps Gann saw that interpretation as a problem to his observations about the distant future.

"His prophecy on the future Pope is No. 266. Fides Intrepida, which means -- "Unwavering Faith, unshaken belief in the face of danger; unfaltering devotion." pg 82

"Unfaltering."  When I first researched Pope Francis in  Wikipedia I found "Unfaltering orthodox" as a component of his description.  I cannot find that description in Wikipedia now.  Not a lot of evidence in subjective characterizations.

So how might we identify the real 266th Pope? What is the 'number' of Pope Francis according to the methodology Awodele identified which Gann may have used to compute the 'number' of Woodrow Wilson, '28'?

By that methodology, the number of Pope Francis is 5 and 266 reduced is 2+6+6=14 further reduced to 5. That's interesting.  But try this on for size.

Pope Francis was born on 12/17/1936.  On what solar degree of the circle does 12/17/1936 appear?

His birthdate appears on the 266th degree of the solar year.

If Gann was, in its simplest explanation, talking of the reign of the 266th Pope, if Pope Francis is he, if cycles of history repeat, and if the most evil section of the 1000 year cycle was yet to come after the 1926-32 period, then what might that say about the cycle in which Pope Francis reigns?

Jim

Note: As a side, I've read St Malachy's prophecy implied the 266th Pope would be the last.  I've interpreted that to mean an end to some phase of the Catholic church.

Gann speaking from the beyond?

Now in the nth reading of WD Gann's Tunnel Thru The Air (TTTA).  Two notations of great interest to me have been Mr. Gann's unusual reference to St Malachy's prophecy of the 266th Pope and the circumstances of Marie Stanton's disappearance and return.

About the 266th Pope, St Malachy prophecies characterized the popes that would thereafter reign.  His prophesy indicated the 266th Pope would be the last.  Gann notes St Malachy's prophesy would be characterized as "unwavering faith" and I find Pope Francis in Wikipedia characterized as "unwavering orthodox."  St Malachy's prophecy is heaped in controversy, some believing Nostradamus was the ghost author.  Regardless, Gann diverts to the prophecy on page 82 and says:

To those who understand numbers, "266" reveals some remarkable events that are to follow the election of the new Pope. It shows that wars are not yet over and that Europe will have troublesome conditions and in fact, the entire world must yet pass thru a very evil period between 1926 and 1932. 

Surely Gann knew the number of the Pope in the 1920s and it wasn't remotely close to the 266th Pope.  Therefore, he was referring to the future period when the 266th Pope is elected.  Our period.  [Actually, I believe he was referring to both that period of 1926 to 1932, but more important to us, he was referring to our period.]

Now, for a quick overview for those without a background in TTTA, WD Gann's fictional 1920s love, financial and war story that, as he put it in the Foreward, contained a veiled secret.  The hero, Robert Gordon (RG), wooes Marie Stanton (MS) to elope.  They meet June 5, 1927 on the Sunshine Special (a train) with the intent of marrying the next day.  RG and MS turn in for the evening in separate train compartments (how quaint and proper were those things in the 1920s) and MS turns up missing the next day having left a note that said "According to your faith, be I unto you….Time proves all things….I will come to you when I mean the most and your need is the greatest."

So MS leaves in 1927 and does not return until much later.  In the interim, RG conquers the markets (commodities and equities) while inventing airships that enable the US to conquer its foes in the greatest World War.  In the wake of the great US triumph, RG becomes the Supreme Commander of the World and addresses a great congregation of world leaders on August 30, 1932.  Following the address that day, MS returns to RG.

That's the set up.  Gann is speaking to our generation as signaled by the 266th Pope.  Now apply the interval of MS' departure and return:

If the market topped Friday and the proposition above is true (a big 'if'), then Gann was off by…..2 calendar days.  Pathetic.

The astro interval coincidence surrounding the 1927 and 1932 dates is incredible in my accountant's (as opposed to astrologist) opinion.

Jim

Note:  TTTA researchers.  I'm truly a Gann amateur, do not know Gann's veiled secret and have struggled since my first reading of TTTA in 1974.  Be gentle with me in your thoughts.