Still following Luo Clement - More evidence

Following up on the thesis that Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers" was written by WD Gann.

In "The Ancient Science of Numbers" Clement has a page that indications a book on "Numerical Vibration" was in preparation.  I find the following in Publisher's Weekly, vol 98, part 1, September 18, 1920, pg 632:

It seems to indicate a book "Numerical Vibration" was available for sale at Schulte's Book Store, 80 Fourth Avenue, NY, on September 18, 1920?  [I have been corrected, the citation is for a book 'wanted' not a book available.  Regardless, after 12 years since "Numerical Vibration" was said to be imminent of publication, this is the first subsequent notation of it found on the web.  Whether it was a book wanted or a book available, the citation was, in my opinion, Gann's means of calling someone's attention to the date.]

On that date, I find an article was published in the Scientific American "The Change in Outlook Since Classical Days, Which Makes Non-Euclidian Geometry a Possibility."  It's image is difficult to read but it can be found here .

The context of the article is Scientific American's competing essays forum that examines the concept of Einstein's "four dimensional time-space manifold."  The particular author is NOT NAMED.  The nature of the article deals with ancient Greeks deriving through Pythagorean geometry (triangle and sum of the squares) a system of theoretical geometry that may be extended, through inference, to describe all properties of space about us.

The author argues that modern science proposes "postulates," or fancy assumptions, we must accept to follow the modern scientist to prove things that may or may not be true based, all conditioned on those beginning assumptions. 

Instead (as best shown on the continuation on page 288, the first full paragraph), classic geometry gives us everything we need to examine the time-space dimension. Here is my transcription of that paragraph (again, the article is hard to read, hence, I re-typed as best I could read it):

Until proven otherwise, the 1908 notation in "The Ancient Science..." of the future publication of "Numerical Vibration" leads me to the "Numerical Vibration" in the Publisher's Weekly on September 18, 1920 and the September 18, 1920 date leads me to the examination of Classical Euclidian geometry as a means to examine Einsteinian four-dimensional time-space.  Gann is telling us the nature of time is geometric....Euclidian geometry.  Time is a Pythagorean structure that can be described by distance and Cartesian coordinates. [As you might detect, I'm struggling with the concepts of the article.  There is a follow-up article referenced below.] 

That article expresses the implication of Robert Gordon's 7 days according to the many blog posts I've presented.  That RG circumnavigated the globe and that his travels produced a perfect Pythagorean triangle when one relates squares of the distances traveled east west and north south.  And, as you might note, RG's travels are described by Descartes' system of Cartesian coordinates. 

And as further proof, you might further search Tunnel Thru the Air for the further proof for "Descartes."  The good professor makes a cameo appearance in RG's search for Marie.



IMO the above article was written by WD Gann and Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers" was written by WD Gann as well.  The evidence has been laid out previously: Mathew 9:29 on page 16 and in Marie's letter, the five asterisks in both books, the triple triangle in both books (see my previous essays).  And the correspondence of the 1908 publication date of "The Ancient Science..." with Gann's asserting his greatest discovery having occurred in 1908.....

I'd appreciate any evidence to disprove my assertions; a citation of Luo Clement having lived in New York City, the text of the book "Numerical Vibration", something, anything.  jrosscpa01@gmail.com.

Jim

Note. My listing of books published or co published by Roger Brothers is up to 10 titles including Luo Clement's one book.  Not a particularly large portfolio of publications, but that's another thread.  It remains tempting to think Roger Brothers was related to Gann as well (underwritten, etc.).

Second note.  The author of the September 18, 1920 article, whom I believe is WD Gann, followed up that article with a second and meatier article in December 1920 found here2.