WD Gann's First natural law of time and space - proposed, part 1 of 3 (maybe more)

[Ralph Waldo Emerson's "Essays First Series" are delightfully read by Bob Neufeld, a Stradivarius of voice among fiddles, at Librivox.org found HERE.]

Starting at the end rather than the beginning, I cannot measure the hours I have poured into the mysterious "Square of 9" to emerge without distilling exactly how it works.  I still can't after what I believe is a brief moment of insight recounted hereafter that I had yesterday and this morning.  But I believe I am on the right track.

The insight, and I do humbly consider it in  a state of pendency, is that the square root of time is inversely (in the sense of opposites or complementary in the directional sense rather than the strict math) with space (and hence price) by its root.  Short translation, take the square root of time plus distance and you get the measure of spacetime; the 'fabric' of spacetime.  And the measure of spacetime, in our Minkowski-special relativity gravity well, is a fixed sum.  If the measure of spacetime is 1 and the component of space distance is .6, then the component of time will be .4.  As we move in spacetime, distance might change to .2 whereupon time will be .8.

WD Gann provides a demonstration in the WD Gann Memorial Triangle (GMT).  I will not recount my discovery of the GMT that I believe Mr. Gann identified as a teaching aid except to describe the circumstance of intuit.  I was standing beside Mr. Gann's stone on June 21, 2015 at exactly noon not realizing it was the summer solstice and looking towards Lower Manhattan through the "Great Tree" and I had sensed two circumstances; first, that the line of some number of stones were co arranged with Mr. Gann's in a line unlike the other surrounding stone alignments and second that the Statue of Liberty was about 15 degrees left of my line of sight, Lower Manhattan directly in my line of sight and 42nd and Broadway (the "Mammouth" Building) was about 45 degrees to the right of my line of sight.  The latter sensation or intuition is the GMT which I have later developed in many essays in this blog.

The GMT is a right triangle with sides that are an exponential progression of space (previous essays).  In contrast, the Pythagorean triangle is an arithmetic progression of space in two dimensions and the Kepler triangle is a geometric progression of space in three dimensions.  I sense the GMT is extremely important.  Following is an image of the GMT and its properties which, using the time and locations of the 4 points, you can derive the relative locations in time and space defining the GMT:

What you might not intuit from the above is that there are two different geometric structures reflected above; one that is visible and one that is not.  The visible is the provable right triangle in space that connects the primary three geographical locations (red vectors).  The invisible structure is the circle of time.  You can see on each of the three vectors connecting points A, B and C not just miles, but time.  And we know, time is circular (from page 76 and 77 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air"):

How many philosophers and physicists have said "time is circular?"  How do we define time?  By the circular rotation of the earth defining days, circular orbits of the moon for months and sun for years....

So, is one's interest piqued when we find both a circle and right triangle represented in the GMT?

We have a circle that begins with the Statute of Liberty's dedication on October 28, 1848 (A), the July 4, 1932 Battle of New York located at 42nd and Broadway, 110-story "Mammouth" (B), and  Mr. Gann's gravestone in Green-Wood Cemetery dated on his passing June 18, 1955 (C).  The circle is formed when you connect from point C back to A to give you a circumference of 137.2734 years.  It might be interesting for you to observe that the three intervals of the circle (A to B, B to C and C to A) will divided that circle into degrees of 180, 120 and 60 degrees.  Do the math.

But what struck me and I took to bed with me last night was the sudden realization that the hypotenuse of the space right triangle, namely point B to C of 6.7481 miles, is also the square root of the diameter of the time circle:

Well, 6.7481 is pretty close to 6.6103 but not exact.  Consider, the measure of time in the Minkowski gravity well of earth is pretty exact.  It doesn't change and we can measure it pretty accurately.  On the other hand, the length of space vector B-C is hard to measure.  It begins at point B, 42nd and Broadway and ends at Mr. Gann's gravestone.  The corner of 42nd and Broadway is a pretty big area...have you been there?  The very small difference of the above two measurements, less than two tenths of a mile or 242 yards is easily explained by the difference between the most northeast corner of the most northeast building at that intersection relative to the most southwestern counterpart.

Add to the above argument of the "reconciliation" of the circle of time to the triangle of space this observation; two triangles.  If we take the square root of the time intervals of the circle of time we get a perfect right triangle when charted....and, even given the subjectivity of the measurement of space inherent in determination of points A and B of the space triangle, we get two right triangles:

What's the likelihood of the coincident occurrence of two right triangles of time and space?  Compare the angles of each of the triangles!  As Sherlock responded to Mycroft when Mycroft asked his brother, "What do we say about coincidence?".......Sherlock replied "The universe is seldom so lazy."

A finer point.  The "sqrt(Time)" triangle is exact.  It is a perfect triangle to the 1/1000th degree of precision as denoted with the 90* without a decimal.  Input into triangle calculator was carried to the 4th decimal and degrees are computed and displayed to the 3rd decimal.  That the "sqrt(Time)" is displayed as "90*" and not "90.XXX" degrees means, I believe, the angle was formed exactly to at least 3 decimals of precision.  If we could define the exact hour and minute and exact location on Statue of Liberty Island when the Monument was dedicated in 1886 etc, we could compute the exact 90* angle to many decimals of accuracy. The space triangle is formed with an error of .331* degrees demonstrating the subjectivity of how Google maps determined the GPS of 42nd and Broadway.

Yet the further perfection of the square root of time, we find the component circles of time created when we add point 'd' denoting the time and location of the destroyed World Trade Center are, as well, perfect right triangles.  Let me restate that.  Looking at the first insert above, the "Primary triangle of ABC" is subdivided into three component triangles, AdB, BdC and AdC.  Those space triangles have associated with them three time circles and the time intervals time circles, reduced to their root produce time triangles.  Those component time triangles are perfect 90* right triangles:

Not to trick you, but the construction of any circle of time that circles the last point in time back to the first point in time to create the third interval...will always result, when those three intervals are reduced to their root, result in a perfect 90* triangle.  Not in any way does that mathematical property reduce my amazement that both time and space, separately, give right triangles in the GMT.  That latter "coincidence" is anything but that in my opinion.  It was WD Gann who identified the GMT as it exists in nature in BOTH time and space simultaneously.  

Two last observations offered and pending for the moment.  The simultaneous existence space and time triangles are the means by which Mr. Gann predicted the time and place of the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks (see the 6th Manifest Prophecy series of essays that began HERE), point 'd' above.   

Second, the three component 90* time triangles and the primary 90* time triangle, when conjoined along their common legs may form corners in a "cube of time" envisioned by and written about by Bradley Cowan.  I believe that time provides a portion of each cube and never the whole; rather time provides a portion of the cube and space provides the complementary portion of the cube.  Sir Arthur Eddington, who in 1920 provided the first definitive English explanation of Einstein's theories in "Space Time and Gravitation," characterized "spacetime" as a fabric.  It isn't time that is the one and only component of the yarn of from which the fabric is created nor is space...they are interchangeably, complimentary, reciprocally and inversely related space and time...components of the same.

The proof or disproof of the above thinking is somewhat itself in the nature of the perfect 90* triangles of time found and the simultaneity of the primary time triangle and primary space triangle.  The further proof will be found in the prediction that was made of the 9/11 World Trade Center aforementioned and in Mr. Gann's laboratory of time and space; the stock market.  I expect to address those applications, to the extent of my ability to understand, in continuations of this thread.  

And I might fail.  For certain I won't be the dumber for having tried.

You can compute every one of the numbers above.  I've provided the date and GPS for each location, the GPS calculators are available, the calculators of days between dates are available...  If you do, and there aren't any errors, then the ball is in your court to dispute the "coincidences" I've uncovered.  But if you haven't done those things, criticism would then be out of ignorance, not wisdom.  Your call.

Jim Ross