Numerology according to an amateur

According to the methodology used by Awodele (to the extent I fully understand it) to simulate Gann's calculation of Wilhelm Hohenzollern's number 28 (Pythagorian name letter and Gregorius/Sepharial birth number systems), the NYSE's number is 103 reduced to 4:

NYSE's number 4 is in the second triad of numbers - 2, 4 and 8 - and will be in concord with any of those numbers.  It therefore will not be in concord with 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, or 9.

The cornerstone N or 5 denotes, among others things, instability, jealousy, unkindness.  According to Luo Clements it is always negative and, only when under strict control can it develop admirable traits; "...it is never a good number."  N is denoted by the number 5 and 5 is not in concord with the NYSE's "number" 4.  

The capstone E or 5 has a dual nature; beneficent and maleficent.  "Although a good number when in concord, it is a most dangerous number when in discord."  E or 5 is not in concord with NYSE's number 4.

The NYSE has 20 letters so there isn't a single keystone letter.

The NYSE's annual chart with great tops highlighted in yellow:

Some observations:

• When you add the column number of a year to the row number of a year only one of those sums are in concord with NYSE's number 4; 2000 had a sum of 4.  Looking at 1929 as an example, it is under the column headed by K and associated number 2.  As its primary letter influence we'd expect the K or 2 and the NYSE's number to be in concord and, therefore, 1929 would be a good year.  However, if you add that 2 to the number of the row you get 3 which is in discord with 4.  2000, the lone concordant year, was on the vertical halfway line that bisects the chart and on which vertical line you find both 1987 and 2007.
• Similar to 1929, 2014 is under the influence of K but its row number of 5 causes it to have a discordant sum (7) relative to the NYSE number 4.
• 2014, 1929 and 1907 all fall on a 45* angle to 1792.  1987 and 2007 fell on the same horizontal line.
• 1987, 2007 and 2000 all fall on the same vertical line that sections the chart in one half.  
• 2014 falls on the same row as 1914, the year in which the market closed for 4 months concurrent with Wilhelm Hohenzollern's involvement in the "July 1914 crisis" leading up to WWI.
• Many more observations.

Now the 7th monthly chart of the NYSE from its inception:

I did not provide the first 3 charts but you can prove the accuracy of this chart by comparing the age of the NYSE to the bottom left corner of the 7th chart.  May 17, 1792 plus 6 completed charts of 400 months per chart is equal to 1992 which is the bottom left date of June 17, 1992.

First a tabular summary of primary letter columns and secondary letter rows:

Some observations:

• The first thing that really jumps out at me is the red highlighted section of the summary.  Bradley Cowan defines the present Pentagonal cycle defined by 72* of helio Uranus as beginning in 1998 and ending in 2016.  That red highlighted section shows that period (1998 actually straddles it).  In that section you find only 2 numbers for those 3 years; 6 and 7.  And in 2014 the primary and secondary numbers are 6 and 7. 
• You also find in that summary that, in stark contrast to the annual chart, 2 of the 3 bad years in the red highlighted group had a summary of primary and secondary number influences that add to a concordant 4.  For example, 2007 had a primary number of 13 reduced to 4.  2014's sum of primary and secondary numbers is, similarly, 13 reduced to 4.
• May 2014 falls on the 45* angle relative to May 1924 as does March 2000, July 1998, August 1987 and September 1929.  
• May 2014 falls on the same horizontal line as September 2007.
• Too many more observations to mention.

This is the first 24 hours since I constructed the monthly chart and will be supplementing as anything significant might emerge.  Preliminarily, and depending on whether the 'number' was correctly computed and charts correctly constructed, I believe the above supports my contention that one should have sold in May (specifically the last day of May) and gone away.  

Jim

Corrections:  

The first day of the first month of the NYSE was 5/17/1792 and thus is named every cell in the monthly squares.  Therefore the May 17, 2014 square would relate to 30 days past the May 17, 2014 or up to and including June 16, 2014.  The conclusion to my adventure into numerology should have made that distinction and should not have indicated that the May cell ended this last weekend.  

An additional clarification.  May 17, 2014 (May 17 to June 16) cell is a very good prospect for a final top.  However, the August 2014 and September 2014 cells are very good prospects as well.  I have not looked at them closely as yet.  It's also possible they are candidates for a secondary top.

Jim