Monday, June 2, 2014

Follow up on "SPX 1998 squaring 2014 and Bradley Cowan's Pentagonal Cycle"

This follows up on the essay "SPX 1998 squaring 2014 and Bradley Cowan's Pentagonal Cycle" at:

http://markettimeandpricetownhall.blogspot.com/2014/05/some-background-and-set-up.html

It projected a "market" top about May 30, 2014 (actually quite specifically) based on a Phi expansion of the initial vibration of the first wave of the present Pentagonal 17-year Uranus cycle.  Whew, that's a mouthful summary.

This is where the Uranus angle to SPX price stood on Friday.



Pretty close to an angle of 60* but not quite there; 55* relative to high intraday and 57* relative to the close.  Both are the highest prices of the 2009 to present bull market.  NOTE the date between the 70* closing price and 68* high price - May 29. I didn't see that one coming.

Now, where was Uranus and price on the first day of Bradley Cowan's Uranus Pentagonal Cycle?  



It's a little messy, but the lowest close of 1998 was 957.28 on 8/31/1998 and the market opened at that price on 9/1/1998 so I will use that price even though it was a day earlier.  The low intraday on 9/1/1998 was 939.98 even though there lowest close for 1998 was 923.32 more than a month later on 10/8/1998.  Since we are comparing movement of price to Uranus, I'm going to stick with the Uranus cycle beginning date of 9/1/1998 and the low intraday of 939.98.  

So how did price and Uranus angles change between 9/1/1998 and 5/30/2014?


The "synodic" angle of Uranus-Price/close changed 20* and the similar angle of Uranus-Price/intraday changed 36* (half a Pentagonal unit of 72*). 

Can't make that stuff up.  

Still, it looks bad for May 30, 2014 being the end of the 2009 bull because futures are up 2.50 on fair value pre market.  I guess any where in this range of a week or two would be okay since we're dealing with a big planet.  My expectations were high since the Pentagonal half cycle 36* from 9/1/1998 nailed the 'mid-cycle' panic top so closely (within 3 trading days)….. but that's an entirely separate and documented theory.

See what happens.

Jim

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.