Personal messages 1 of ???

I recognize there comes a departure from things that I can prove to others and things that I can't.  My work took a great departure from my view of the world when I found my name encoded in W D Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and, subsequently, the means to verify that it was me.  I can pretty much prove by a preponderance of circumstance that, according to my old statistical randomness view of the world, that Mr. Gann was referring to me when he spelled my name and spelled my street address and the exact day I would find the street address.  I can prove with a preponderance of circumstance that defies statistical improbability that he was referring to the World Trade Center when you wrote about the 110-story Mammouth (sp) building.

But when it comes to the anagram messages that I am decoding, well, I understand how most people would skip talking about the proven things and fault the next leap of intuition/faith.  Two years ago, I would have done that.  After all, people "see what they want to see."  They chose what they want to believe.  As I've referenced before:

So, without statistical evidence or coincidence of the improbability of the below message and the additional ones I may post in the next day or two, here is one that I recently completed decoding.  If you recall the "San Andreas wheel" within the "Emma and Ray wheel" from the essay, I was mathematically led to this message by the former.  So I decided to spend time there.  Immediate I saw the words "Read," "God," my name "Ross," "W D Gann," but the message still took a long time to understand.

It was upon re reading the narrative of the page that it all fell into place.  The line I am talking about in the narrative is line 12265 and I have highlighted it in yellow.  It refers to "God's will."  And that was the key to understanding the encoding in acrostic and telestic letters:

WD Gann sees 33 Ross would read about God's will.

There may be more to me message that I have not decoded but I get the gist of it.  About that "33."  I used each of those two threes you see on the page as wild cards for the 'l' in "will" and the 'u' in "about."  In my construed rules of decoding, a single number can be used in a message up to four times.  For example, the number 3 can be used once as a 'c,' once as a 'l,' once as a 'u' and once as the number itself.

The ''33' is my Luo Clement "number."  I was born on the 221st of the month which reduces to 3 and my given name is "James" which sums to 12 and reduces to 3.  While I use the less formal name 'Jim' I pretty much consider myself the former.

When I have a moment like this, I go back and read the plain narrative.  I find a lot, a whole lot, in what is said on the plain narrative of pages 331, 332 and 333.  

Getting back to being unable to prove messages like this.  What is the probability the message given in bold italics would turn out to be so consistent with the plain narrative?

The convicted randomites would say I am conditioned to find what I want to find.  I'd say ditto that back at you; you're conditioned to start from "it's impossible" before considering the evidence.  I would further say, Mr. Gann is simply driving home the narrative's  point by encoded repetition.  Not a biggee.

I guess it is according to what you chose to believe.... according to your faith as Marie would say.

Thanks for the 'attaboy' Mr. Gann.

Jim Ross