Rumination on a paragraph in the "Ticker Interview"

What a powerful statement on vibration:

As if I were the first to notice; its great when you get older because you can experience a 'new' epiphany ever day out of subject matter to which you previously expressed wonder.

Noteworthy:

• Each stock in a grouping has a unique rate of vibration.
• Stocks resolve to a periodic motion following any impulse that dislodges them.
• A stock's properties (vibration, periodicity, reaction to an impulse) 'recur' just as its own weight of vibration increases...the periodic table of elements.

I've suggested Mr. Gann was a world class physicist...an Einstein class physicist; perhaps the latter's superior.  I've suggested Mr. Gann was the 1920's Einstein Essay Prize Editor who moderated that contest appearing in a half dozen issues of Scientific American.  The link to that series of articles is a singular September 18, 1920 advertisement in "The Publishers Weekly:"

That same  book announced in the opening leafs of Luo Clement's (who is a non de plume of WD Gann as I have claimed) "The Ancient Science of Numbers" named "Numerical Vibrations" which there isn't any record of having been written...9 years later someone is trying to purchase a copy.  

And that same day we find the mysterious "Einstein Editor" writing in his essay of that date that a perfectly serviceable calculation of Einsteinium special relativity might be had out of the use of Descartisian coordinates and Euclidian geometry:

At least, as a finite mathematician (accountant) I claim my synopsis might be had from the above by virtue of our existing in a Minkowski gravity well (earth's gravitational field) where time is not altered by acceleration, gravitation.

Now flip back to the Ticker Interview quote.  Realizing (I realize, others are less 'out there' with me) we are dealing with a physicist who is relating physical (physics) natural law to the stock market, we need to be relating rules of the periodic table to stocks according to their weight and class-inferred characteristics.  The story of the development of the periodic table (Lavoisier, Newlands and Mendeleev) is an incredible one of "deductive science;" ah Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.  Elements can be classified by their weights and according to the class of their mathematic weight each element in a class exhibits characteristics of their class.

Okay, okay, you get all that from the plain reading the paragraphs in the Ticker Interview following the opening citation.  But what you don't get is the connection to Luo Clement (aka WD Gann, IMO) or the level of application of physics.  Most of all you don't get the implication; a stock's "atomic weight" and its classification on the periodic table of stock elements is its "Numerical Vibration...which was never published...explicitly.  

Where is this going?  I've predicted a yet to occur earthquake based on the WD Gann Map of Time (MOT) its reflection of the earthquakes that occurred in 1848 and 1906.  At this point, the prediction is based on a device that we (I) perceive that a person left in a book; the MOT.  The prediction, as stated, depends on a subjective perception (my perception) of another person's encoded device.  The device is the problem.  Did I interpret the device correctly?

Moreover, what is the device based upon?  Well, it must be a result of either WD Gann's mistaken understanding of 'nature law,' my misunderstanding of his understanding, or....it must be based on real natural law and will therefore manifest.  The device is not "the thing."  "The thing" is the natural law applied to time and stocks should be as real as the prediction of the boiling point of hydrogen.  If the device is correct, then there should be a mathematical formulation that is "the thing."

So, how do we categorize stocks similar to the categorization of elements?  Where do we find the atomic weight, if you will, of a stock or a nation or a....person?  I'd submit we find the means to  classify all things according to characteristics they will exhibit is the methodology we find in "The Ancient Science of Numbers."   It all 'hangs' together;  WD Gann, Luo Clement, the Einstein Editor and the understanding of how stocks vary according to 'natural law.'

The stock market was simply the laboratory of this great physicist, WD Gann.  From his "Master Course for Stocks."

I had a smile on my face the other day when a reader suggested 'my' prognosis for dire problems in the stock market comported with WD Gann's "The Financial Table" which, as he accepted was based on the North Node.  It was as if the device, "The Financial Table" was the acid test of natural law.  Not mocking him in any way because, if anything is certain, I don't know.  But so it should be understood, the MOT isn't anything other than a man made device interpreted by a person who doesn't know any better (knows a hell of a lot less in fact).  The MOT, should it be found valid by time and events, is twice removed, from natural law; WD Gann's formulation and my interpretation.  The search cannot stop at the MOT.

If the personal interpretation of the man-created device MOT proves valid (predictions of the year 2016), then there must be a mathematic natural law that is the source of the prediction.  Acrostically encoded on page 36 (interesting number, 36 at 1/10th of the circle) of "The Tunnel Thru The Air:"

I offer "Number is the if and why of all things."  I can envision Pythagoras nodding his head in approval.  Or is it delusion; the "23 enigma?"

Jim Ross