My study of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" was fired by the wonderment of seeing the six consecutive telestic eeeee's that were arranged as such in the Foreword. In random text, the unlikelihood of such an event is prohibitive in a finite population of letters. With only 15341 lines and far less having a last letter to the line (there are many blank lines for line feeds and page breaks, etc.) it was a signal to the observant reader. The signal was clear; this book, TTTTA, is encoded with acrostic/telestic words.
But, to my shame, I've only mentioned one set of 6 eeeeees; there is a second one. I have not mentioned the second because I did not understand them. It ran contrary to my skepticism of astrology born out of personal experience and study and out of comments that Mr. Gann made. For example, I've only recently published an essay title "Impossibility is the logic of fools" in which Mr. Gann lumps astrology with other systems of market analysis remarking their value was worthless or, at best, lacking something.
Having discovered what I believe to be Mr. Gann's perfect math and science of space and time...and of market prediction... I find more similar aspects between that perfect math and science and astrology rather than less. Here are the second set of 6 eeeeee's which I believe I understand:
"....the great science of Astrology." I can't take that facetiously. How can I square that narrative with that which appears in the "Impossibility is the logic of fools" that, at best, systems of astrology were lacking something?
I said I think I know so here's what I think. I haven't given you the last detail of Robert Gordon's math and I have not described how Luo Clement's calculation of vibration categories limits the Robert Gordon math to a beginning and an ending. But the fruit of the calculation, according to my understanding, will be proven in six months. Until then take what I think, under advisement.
Start with Mr. Gann's assertion of his method of prediction (all taken from Chapter VII):
We have a couple elements. In the first of the inserts, we have 1) tribes or categories each having a character and 2) we have a calculation from a beginning. In the second excerpt we have 3) mathematic sequences, 4) history repeats, and, again, the starting point. In the third we have 5) the "curve for the future." And in the last excerpt, we have, again, the right beginning, and 6) Pi.
Oh, I might be able to provide other characteristics of his method such as "wheel within a wheel" etc, but its more a description than a component of the method as best I can determine.
Six items of his method of predicting the future. I find them all in the math of "Robert Gordon's seven days" except for the tribes or categories and I find that in Luo Clement's methodology of determining the vibration of a person, a nation, a stock or commodity.
Here are the difference between Mr. Gann's method, as I understand it, and astrology.
1) The "curve of the future" defined by Robert Gordon's seven days is a Kepler triangle comprised of geodesic space growth of that space by root phi. The curve of the future of astrology is the selected orbit of a selected heavenly body. Both the math of Robert Gordon's seven days and the orbit of a planet (including periodic aspects) are governed by perfect mathematics. The problem for astrology is, in my opinion, planetary orbits are assumed to be the independent variable on which dependent terrestrial historic events, events of time and space, are considered dependent. Astrology defines orbits as independent and events on earth as dependent.
Instead, the "curve for the future" and the perfect mathematics are the independent variable. Orbits and their aspects are dependent on the independent variable, mathematics. And terrestrial and mortal events are, as well, dependent on mathematics. As such, astrology and repeating history are...coincident dependent variables. We expect them to covary but not to covary exactly.
2) The correct beginning. Astrology has the natal time and place. Robert Gordon's seven days hasn't anything comparable. Robert Gordon's seven days is a continuous, never-ending curve of the future that has a vibration. Robert traveled 18,000 miles (rounded) around the earth at the latitude of NYC and ended where he began. He "vibrated" north/south and, in absolute value, traveled the same 18,000 miles. But the symbolic route RG traveled, meant to demonstrate the mathematic thought that time (east/west mileage) and space (north/south) mileage are equal, does not have a end. And if it does not have an end, where might we find a beginning?
Obviously, we will never find the beginning of time. But the beginning of a 'tribe' or category, well, astrology found that. Its the time and place of birth.
The math of Robert Gordon's depends on the latitude of the beginning of Robert's trip; that being the latitude of NYC and, I presume, the beginning of any cycle. If it begins at one latitude the outcome will be different from a different latitude. So far, I have only one observation and we will not know the outcome for six months. But latitude is a component of Robert Gordon's seven days. Longitude is as well because time is judged from the moment of birth...one day from birth is not complete until that same longitude passes again.
But when does the finite cycle of Mr. Gann's calculation end? Symbolically, seven days later upon Robert's return. But the mathematics of Robert Gordons seven days is as continuous as the never ending expansion of the Kepler triangle it occupies. What gives the end which is a beginning in Mr. Gann's cosmology?
It is Luo Clement's calculation of vibration. It's when the a result of two parameters of the perfect math of Robert Gordon's seven days equals the vibration of the subject of prediction. At that point, there is an ending and thus a new beginning.
*** ***
Since we lost our son, I've searched for comfort. I cannot think of greater comfort than of having a great man prove to me his understanding of time and space and his ability to predict the future. I've spent more than three years of intense study in this area and seen many things that are proof of his understanding of space time and the future.
I have documented many "miracles" constituting proof that any person of modest ability, such as me, can replicate using the "Map of Time" I provided for free two years ago. But let's dumb it down one more time. If you just look at the words "110-story Mammouth Building, intentionally misspelled to demand attention, and ask yourself "Really, an air battle at the great 110-story building in NYC?" Duh. Predicting the future. [The 9/11 attack is "The Sixth Manifest Prophecy" of WD Gann.]
If you just ask yourself, "Supreme Commander Robert Gordon," the first use of that rank in history was given to Supreme Commander of Allied Forces Dwight D. Eisenhower in World War II." This in a book that was published more than a decade prior to WWII? And the other names in TTTTA? Nagato, Pearson.... All WWII figures. All in plain sight. Predicting the future. [WWII is "The Fifth Manifest Prophecy" of WD Gann.]
There are too many 'miracles' for a logical person, even if they dismiss the "Map of Time," to deny on their face.
So, I apologize to astrology. It demonstrates so much that is true to the nature of time, space and repeating events on earth. It contains too missing elements of all other science; a concept of the beginning of a cycle and the concept that history will repeat. Without them, contemporary science is, well, clueless in judging the future.
From memory, I recall Mr. Gann as having said "the problem with astrologists is they are not mathematicians." I'd say 'perhaps' to that doubting only my recollection of the quotation.
I believe Mr. Gann gives a 'tip of the hat' to astrology, a 'science' in which he was accomplished as I am given to understand, as well. Just figure the odds. If one occurrence of 6 eeeeee's in the finite population of TTTTA's lines is vastly improbable, then what are the odds of two? In my estimation, he honored astrology with the second set of 6 eeeeee's.
But that's my opinion and, accordingly, my apology.
Jim Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.