Thursday, April 2, 2015

WD Gann's 6th Manifest Prophecy of 9/11, part 3 of 3; The Timing of the 9/11 Tragedy

One number, 69, and the understanding of opposites will connect the events of 1932 to the tragedy of 9/11. When you boil all these three lengthy posts, it  becomes that simple.  And WD Gann designed all of this in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" with the intent that it be found.  As I claim in a separate but contemporary series concerning the 7th prophecy, Mr. Gann intended this information be discovered as it is now; in the time of the 266th Pope.

We are brought to this point that Mr. Gann has predicted the name of the chief terrorist attacker, the building to be attacked, the airline of two of the three planes (perhaps all three) used in the attack, the flight paths of the attack, the number of effective waves of attack.  All the details are at the surface level or encoded in the acrostic/telestic or numerological levels of "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  All that remains is the beginning point in time, the time interval and the application of opposites.

There is but one additional concept needed; discern the correct beginning.  We find Ezekiel 21:30 appearing in, not surpassingly, three places in TTTTA; pages 55, 73 and 176, this excerpt taken from the second citation:

Astrologers know this principle well but us non astrologer pencil pushing CPAs need the lesson; it's not on the CPA exam.  The theme that will emerge is, not only is it that New York City being assaulted in 1932 and 2001, but it is the United States.  That's an end of a war and the beginning of a post war period.  While the focus is on the Mammouth Building and the World Trade Center, the 110-story buildings; the former known in TTTTA as "the cedar" and the latter having become associated with the sycamore (Isaiah 9:10 sycamore/cedar imagery) that saved St Paul's Chapel on September 11, 2001.  More on that in a post on the ongoing prophecy.

The last battle of the fictional 1932 war was Washington DC on July 4, 1932, not that of New York City, nor Robert Gordon's 7 days.  I'll offer that as a proposition as I'm sure there are those who will take issue.  Here's the theory.  Luo Clement, who I have asserted is WD Gann, asserted a person willing him/herself a new name, becomes of that vibration…of that destiny.  Where the nativity of the United States might exist, historically, "depends" and the confusion cannot be better expressed than in the History channel video found HERE.  Ultimately, and by the will and conscious design of the nation, the place of nativity has become Washington DC just as the will of a person can change his or her name.

The event in the life of the nation that will be repeated is a beginning, but a beginning involving opposites.  The last battle of the fictional war takes place on the birthday of the nation in it's adopted place of nativity and from that date, July 4, 1932, Mr. Gann's interval of 69 will be applied to produce, yet again, opposites:


Elegance and simplicity, but still two paradoxes must be reconciled.  Above are the days from the Battle of Washington to the WTC tragedy. Two paradoxes, the 12 hours related to the Mammouth attack and the date of the Battle of Washington.  All paradoxes must be reconciled.

First, let's deal with the 12 hours.  In his description of the attack on the Mammouth, Mr. Gann meticulously avoids using the format "8pm."  Instead, time and again, the time is given as "o'clock."  Not "8pm" but "8 o'clock," not "10pm" by "10 o'clock."  Why this change in wording when throughout TTTTA we find the "am" and "pm?"  It's the use of the opposite; the opposite of night (when the Mammouth attack commenced) is day (when the WTC attack commenced with Flight 11 departing Logan).  It is a difference of 12 hours and, accordingly, a half day is added above.

The second paradox; how can we use the timing of the Mammouth attack and the the date of the Battle of Washington?  It may be as simple as this rumination that Mr. Gann gives us on page 386:


The attack on the Mammouth was merely the beginning of the final battle and the Battle of Washington on July 4, 1932 was its completion.  Just as were the two planes that attacked the WTC, the completion of the tragedy of September 11, 2001 was Flight 77 impacting the Pentagon.  The portion of the attack that related to the Mammouth, the beginning at "8 o'clock" and the ending near "10 minutes after 10 o'clock" would be the same timing for the WTC tragedy recounted in the next paragraph.

Set aside the paradox and consider some exact timing and duration of the attack….to the minute timing.

  • In 1932, Robert Gordon overhears the enemy's having departed to begin their attack on the Mammouth at "8 o'clock" in the evening on page 361 (19 squared or the earth degrees in a solar day) on the Tel-talk.'   Similarly in 2001, at the opposite time of day, the morning, AA Flight 11 departs Logan to begin its attack on WTC.  One minute difference after accounting for the opposite of night and day.


  • In 1932, Robert Gordon sights and destroys two fleets of enemy airplanes, in seemingly minutes, to end the destruction that occurred in 1932 (a third fleet of planes were dropped harmlessly into the Tunnel).  And in 2001, the second tower, the North Tower, fell at 10:28am.  Perhaps, RG spent 18 minutes in completing his destruction of the two fleets of planes….in that case the timing would be exact after accounting for the opposite of night and day.

I can go on and on explaining similarities and resolving paradoxes presented.  Having wrestled with Mr. Gann's concepts so long, hardly leaving the thoughts for now the better part of a year, I've realized two items of relevance among many.

First, owing to the nature of my fallibility I'll get a lot of stuff wrong….I'll make clerical mistakes and I'll make mistakes of logic.  But that's for me to forgive myself and not to apologize for the efforts and progress I believe I have made.

Second and far more important, paradoxes are a matter of understanding.  We get knowledge by studying a teacher who knows; Mr. Gann.  We put our mental construct of the knowledge into motion and productivity through our effort.  But we create "understanding" by wrestling with the concepts derived from the first two steps.  By resolving the paradox on our own and thereby making the 'understanding' our personal understanding.

To my satisfaction, I've resolved the paradoxes involved in the sixth prophecy as provided here and pending further consideration.  Accordingly, I accept that Mr. Gann foresaw, to the day and within 1 minute, the attack on the World Trade Center.  For others, the timing, just according to the numbers, will be attractive but they won't believe my resolution of the paradoxes which I identified.  They might find further dispute of the logic; perhaps additional paradoxes.  They might disagree with my resolutions.  They wrestle with the paradox as did I.  Or, tragically, they might simply dismiss all as being personally or theologically impermissible.  Of those alternatives, only the last is an affront to thought.  It would seem similar thinking forced Socrates to drink hemlock and Galileo to spend his last years in confinement and isolation.

So, forgive my errors, prove that which is factual, resolve what is paradoxical to your satisfaction, and keep whatever is good.

This ends the WD Gann's prophecy of the World Trade Center tragedy, but its a continuing prophecy in that it was only a beginning of an opposite.  Where Mr. Gann styled the victory in 1932 as the end of war and beginning of an era of peace, the opposite occurred in 2001; a defeat.  And as the beginning of the opposite period, 2001 is not a good prognosis for America.  In a separate post in the ongoing prophecy, I'll provide evidence of WD Gann's warning to the our age, the age of the 266th Pope.  It is similar to Rabbi Jonathan Cahn's thesis recounted in "The Harbinger," but included in "The Tunnel Thru the Air";  about 73 years before the first warning symbolized in the WTC tragedy and 83 years before its recognition by Rabbi Cahn.

Jim Ross
of Tottenham


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.