Stop the presses; Time out for an earthquake

Presently in process, there are essay sequences examining 1) the mathematics of Mr. Gann's inscrutable triangle within the outer circle and outer square....proves the fourth dimension, 2) a detailed study of all earthquakes relative to the acrostic "ens" to determine if there is a correlation and deterministic math relation and 3) the timeline of the first battles of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

In addition, an essay is planned to discuss the "Jonas Storm" that occurred January 2016 relative to the possible manifestation of a 4.9M earthquake that occurred about 33 days later on February 23, 2016 at Wasco CA (only a couple miles from San Francisco).  Was the minor storm "Jonas Storm" a harbinger of the minor 4.9M earthquake connected by a notable number (the days I compute are 32 days by its hard to say its 32 or 33 if you can't determine an exact date and hour of a storm).  If there are minor Jonas signs and minor events and major Jonas signs and major events?

Perhaps, signs and cycles within signs and cycles.

So HERE, a find courtesy of a long-time Internet friend, is an earthquake article that has interrupted my many divergent trains of thought this morning.  A telling excerpt from that article:

[The article is incorrect in spirit.  The 3.2M that occurred of which they write is not the critical event.  They say its the largest in over a year within 100 miles.  Some journalistic or scientific finesse.  No, perhaps they put that fine point on their article to ignore the February 23, 2016 Wasco 4.9M earthquake.  Or perhaps USGS did so in order not to signal greater concern.  Wasco is midway between SF and LA and darn close if not on top of the San Andreas (I have not checked that.)]

By my study in the earthquake series it had already become clear that the 1906 SF earthquake was preceded by activity around the Pacific Rim of Fire.  I didn't know about the offshore 3.2M that occurred two days ago.  And more-so, that that earthquake signaled offshore structural problems that may involve SF.  This article is a must read.

Almost religiously, government seismologists are said to be opposed to the idea that earthquakes propagate additional earthquakes that "ripple" outward.  Unlike a pebble thrown into a liquid, or a meteor hitting the upper atmosphere and creating a circular and expanding wave, earthquakes are in solids and solids don't ripple.  Surely, the recent earthquakes in Ecuador and Japan cannot create an increased likelihood of events other places.  Hmmm, the first big ones were Indonesia, then Japan, then, Vanuatu, then Equador.  Going the other way from the first Indonesia equakequake quakes have moved westward as well.  The exact chronological progression is tracked HERE by Michal Janitch.  He has long held that earthquakes propagate outward from the initial shock and has been assailed by the seismic community.  As well, he has held that earthquakes are predictable and that earthquakes in an area are interrelated.  

Interestingly, the USGS is the agency signaling the concern.  Are they throwing in the towel?  Is the information they are getting so contrary to their theories of earthquake propagation they must admit their error?  Or is it because the information so public?  So painfully obvious?

Here is the article's map of concern included in the cited article:

The above flies in the face of what is said to be traditional seismic events; specially distant earthquakes are not related, are not predictable, do not propagate in waves.

But the greater question.  Okay, we have notable earthquakes every 7 years in SF (not tragic events, just notable).  We have a Cascade Subduction event (the subduction that exists from just north of SF through Portland and Seattle deep into Canada) every 300 years and one is now greatly overdue.  We have not had a Yellowstone event for 630,000 years.

What might be the first Jonas sign?  Did the first Jonas sign occur in January 2016 with the Jonas Storm?

I was going to write this essay after completing other research as noted in the first paragraph and I was going to suggest (as opposed to predict or conclude), that a deep Pacific shock might be that next small Jonas sign.

And I was going to write, if one sees that Pacific shock manifest into a greater event tragically involving SF and LA (as it did in the battles of SF and LA in TTTTA), then one might want to consider if those tragic events are the Jonas sign for a Cascade Subduction event.  Again, a far greater event.  

And if a Cascadia event occurs (such would dwarf a SF and LA event both in damage to SF and LA but to all coastlines of the Pacific Rim of Fire by virtue of the super tsunami created) would it be great Jonas sign of Yellowstone.

Never fear.  We are told  earthquakes do not geographically propagate out from an initial shock and yet we see the above make.  We are told are not predictable:

Obviously, there was an error on page 320 of TTTTA:

An inadvertent error or an intentional error.  Do we create the correct word by removing the 'y' from "greaty" to create the word "great"  .... or do we remove the "at" to create the word "grey."  What would a volcanic ash storm look like?

From page 69 of TTTTA...and the Bible:

The "key" to the interpretation of the future, perhaps?  

And from page 83:

Creating these 'imaginative' stories out of the 'clues' found in TTTTA is just too easy.  As always, make up your own mind.  Do your own research.

[If you would like to understand the magnitude of many of the above events, the 2015 article, "The Really Big One", was recently awarded a Pulitzer Prize for it portrayal of such events and has been favorably reviewed by the seismic community regarding its fair treatment of such scenarios.  Please don't trust me for your perception of earthquakes; they don't teach us that stuff for the CPA exam.]

Jim Ross

The first enemy campaign, part 1: Phi, Robert Gordon and the battles lines

I'm so eloquently reminded of my excessive imagination, bordering on delusion, by the insightful Noxious Stalker (formerly known as the Noxious One).  A delusional person would not perceive the possibility of error.  Would the Noxious Stalker perceive his own bigoted delusion if he did not consider the person as, even remotely, being correct?

I put that paragraph first because I'm going down the road of the remotely possible meaning of the TTTTA war timeline; as perhaps, a future timeline.  Again, its caveat emptor.

Phi is represented in WD Gann's "Map of Time" as evident by the line structure and story found in his "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  As documented in previous essays the MOT is 15341 lines from cover to cover and spans the time between Robert Gordon's birth to the last date of the book or 9,579 days:

Set Phi aside for the moment; new train of thought.

War is declared on the U.S. in April, we don't know when in April:

"Fate."  The US rushed its great forces to the Pacific Coast to confront the great danger posed by the enemy.

Of course, similar posturing occurred prior to the entry of Japan into WWII, followed by the attack on Pearl Harbor December 7, 1941.  That the above was an allusion to Pearl Harbor is not mutually exclusive of another meaning as history is perceived as, at least, "rhyming."

The above occurs some time between April and mid May because we find the attack on Los Angeles occurs mid May...let's say May 10:

Prior to WWII the U.S. focused its might on the Pacific Coast.  In the fictional war, TTTTA focused the military might of the U.S. on the Pacific Coast.  Is it overstating the case to say that the lone remaining strength of the U.S., its intellectual and economic might, is centered in L.A. and San Francisco?  What would be the impact on the country and the world if those cities were lost?

As "fate" has it, L.A. was surrendered June 14 and the U.S. expected an attack on S.F. at any time:

Throughout the country, people were anxious.  The next attack was from Brownsville, TX to El Paso on August 1, below.  So many encoded messages are associated with the August 1 attack; "wmd," "wdgan," "ens," "CAL."

Days went by and the U.S. was anxious regarding the nature of the next attack:

And the attack on San Francisco occurred in September 1930:

The above may form a time line of sorts.  Can we visualize the geographical progression?  Perhaps Mr. Gann provided a quick easy picture; the battle lines (first conceived by a commenter, Dolemite).  Yes, we can.  

Hiram Abiff, who chose death over giving up his ancient knowledge, Albert Einstein who developed "emsy" or "E=MC2" on September 27, 1905...and the battle lines (discovered by Dolemite, a commenter).  Visually, the battle lines, including the fall back secondary lines, are:

You have the U.S. component of the Pacific Rim of Fire, lacking only Yellowstone as the seismic Achilles Heel of the country.

The first battle, first timeline; L.A. > El Paso Brownsville > San Francisco.

So much on the table.  One last component before I leave this essay hanging.  Jonas.  From the inscrutable page 69 we are treated to "...no sign shall be given but the sign of Jonas..."  Robert believe this to be the "...key to the interpretation of the future..."  Do we find Jonas in any of the inserts above?  Yes.  The first insert of the MOT above has Jonas encoded in zig zag, acrostic/telestic letters corresponding the declaration of war.  Jonas and the declaration of war.

*******

What is the Jonas sign, if only in my imagination, that Mr. Gann intended?  Perhaps the "Jonas storm" this last winter as named not by me but by the media?  A minor one in my opinion.  There is always a "greater and lesser" we are told.  I think the greater sign is yet to occur.  And I have an opinion what that sign will be.

If, in my imagination, there is a time line expressed in TTTTA, how might the obvious reference to Phi alter or position the time line?  In my imagination, I have an opinion on that.

I do not know how these thoughts will turn out.  Obviously, as I think I write.  If I were to know the reality, whatever it is, before us, I'd be writing it in plainer words but I do not.  Thinking I had the answer in January, I made my "great mistake," fearing we were out of time.  Always, it is good to consider the source and make up your own mind.  The latter takes effort, however.

This time, I have those same fears, but the Jonas sign does not seem to have occurred to set in motion a proportionate timeline of events...that Mr. Gann may have provided us.   The Jonas sign, the declaration of war.  And Phi.

"The first battle..." will be continued,

Jim Ross

  

ENS 7: Additional data, the 12 most destructive earthquakes in the MOT period

Back to the productive work of examining the great earthquakes since the beginning of the WD Gann "Map of Time" which is found in his "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  Productive to the extent it may (or may not) demonstrate a rhythm or vibration or harmonic of how a physical world event relates to a master "curve of the future."

As presently conceived the data gathering will derive the great earthquakes from list of earthquakes considered 'great' based on differing criteria; the deadliest, the most destructive (monetary) and the most powerful.  Of the Wikipedia list of "deadliest" earthquakes, 15 data points/earthquakes were painfully identified here.  Having now completed work on 12 of the "most destructive" earthquakes since June 22, 1848 (beginning of the MOT), this essay will capsule that research and provide links to individual findings in the MOT.  A further essay will identify the most powerful earthquakes.

Ideally, 40 earthquakes will be found.  There is an encoded acronym in TTTTA, "ens," that, it is believed, represents the USGS "Earthquake Notification Service."  This acronym is obvious if one considers the acrostic and telestic letters found in TTTTA for any period of time.  Its relation to earthquakes was discovered via the "Tokyo J1" connection as has been explained in previous essays.  There are 21 instances of "ens" in TTTTA and 19 instances of its inversion "sne."  Had I been WD Gann and wanted to demonstrate how to mathematically relate predictions to their manifestation in real events, I might plant the acronyms and relate them to the same number of physical events.  Speaking "ideally" again, I would need 40 physical events and 40 acronyms.  Maybe that will work, maybe that won't.

With the present list of 12 "most destructive" earthquakes there will be a cumulative total of 27 data points.  The 12 "most destructive" earthquakes are derived from Wikipedia's list of "Costliest earthquakes"  which is reproduced below:

Of the above 16 earthquakes, 4 have evaluated as "deadliest" earthquakes in the previous essay leaving 12 to be evaluated here.  Notably, San Francisco becomes the 12th item on the reviled list.  To save on space, below is the list of 12 "most destructive" or "costliest" earthquakes since June 22, 1848:

What are the expectations to be achieved or refuted from this work?  The immediate reward would be finding associated with each of the 12 earthquakes evidence WD Gann foresaw its occurrence.  Here's an example of the Haiti earthquake and tsunami:

• You see the perfect spelling.
• You see the MOT date on the right.  
• You see "Haiti" spelled perfectly in the green highlight.  
• You see each letter is an acrostic.  
• You see every letter is a capital letter.    You see a perfect 16X16 matrix...the highest 'T' is 16 lines above the date line and the lowest 'i' is 16 lines below the date line (is that 2^3 X 2^3).  
• You see my name (highlighted in red) embedded 'as if' I was foreseen as seeing this.

Is the spelling of "Haiti" random?  No.  This observation is dispositive in my opinion.  There isn't a statistician alive whom I wouldn't challenge to assert this is a random coincidence.  One of the above bulleted coincidences, two or three but 7....just like the "6 e's"...  the statistical unlikelihood (a joint probability) of the above obvious sentient arrangement is, itself, incredibly great.

Of the 15 deadliest earthquakes, that's one highlight, albeit, the 'best case.'  The other observations were not as strong in evidence but they were adequate.  At the conclusion, the observations were tabled and there were 10 missing letters and among there were 5 unique letters.  They spelled a meaningful message in the context of earthquakes and the genesis of these recent 5 essays, that being "Yellowstone now;"  the message was "QUICK" in all capital letters.  "QUICK" seals the deal.  All 15 observations combined, by virtue of their joint, unique, absent letters, to create an intelligible, relevant and timely message.

Again ideally, that's what we might expect in this most current essay regarding the 12 most destructive earthquakes.  

What was the outcome of this present work?  Not as good, but highly adequate.  First, I have a low threshold for evidence needed to convince me.  The HAITI example and the "QUICK" finding has me expecting to find what I want.  With that danger in mind and as always, I provide my research; each configuration of letters attending each of the 12 observations.  Note the spacial arrangement of the letters as I have arranged them.  There may be alternate configurations than that which I have presented.  I try to create the "highest" configuration surrounding the date of the event.  That's my attempt at visualizing a "cylinder" test of the proximity of the letters.

The results, in my subjective evaluation, indicate each of the 12 observations was planning and created by Mr. Gann to correspond the date of the earthquake.  The most important indication of this is the geometry and symmetry of the letters spelling the name and/or location of the earthquake.  Below are the screenshots of each observation so that you do not have to recreate them (which I would recommend doing).  

http://screencast.com/t/ik1LPyLjVi7b

http://screencast.com/t/6Qwx3cMt

http://screencast.com/t/Mu7BmQhjaRgo

http://screencast.com/t/91dFshcP

http://screencast.com/t/TWlohlFVE

http://screencast.com/t/V91WWuBfm4

http://screencast.com/t/9En2t8vKxL1

http://screencast.com/t/UoA8sKZ3EObq

http://screencast.com/t/uBLQQ4VBhY

http://screencast.com/t/w4Wh4Iyu

http://screencast.com/t/6UA7KRhoNK

http://screencast.com/t/nSQgGKb2bC2

When reviewing each of the above, ask yourself "Is this random?"  For several, I can see that as a reasonable conclusion.  On most, its hard to ignore the symmetry, the appearance of geometric figures, the absence of letters above or below the date of the event....  

There are 12 letters that were missing in spelling the above.  Review the second insert.  In total 9 observations lacked at least 1 letter.  There were 7 observations missing 1 letter, 1 event missing 2 letters (both letters we 'u' so 1 unique letter) and 1 event missing 3 letters (unique letters, n and c).  

If you are counting unique letters, there were 8 observations missing a unique letter and 1 and only 1 missing two unique letters.  Sa_ Fra_cis_o.  San Francisco.  

In fact, out of the 15 deadliest earthquakes and 12 costliest earthquakes or 27 observations, only one was missing more than 1 unique letter in spelling its name.  Again, San Francisco.

And finally, of the above 12 earthquakes, how many were known to Mr. Gann at the time he published TTTTA in 1927?  Only one.  Again, San Francisco.

Make up your own mind.  Is it random?  Or did he foresee?

Next up, the strongest earthquakes.

Jim Ross

Ah, the aroma of smoldering bigotry

Some time ago I gave up social media largely because it consumed too much time and distracted me from what I wanted to be doing.  I was spending too much time defending what I'd been taught (some right and some wrong) without otherwise creating/recreating myself.  I'd found a great investing bulletin board but it too took too much time.

Without any provocation I receive the following email from a person who long ago I advised to not read my work because it so diverged from his sadly limited perception of the world.  Here, today, he took his valuable time to lecture me on The Bible Code:

Not for a minute do I think this dear person has any interest in my wasting my time.  And for edification, I have read Ingermason's very well thought out work "debunking" The Bible Code.  There have, however, rejoinders to his critique as I distantly recall, one by a Rabbinical Torah, physicist and statistician.  The latter found, again as I distantly recall, the "cylinder proximity" of messages that had come true was statistically significant.  Again, very distant recall and I'll not resort to wasting my time on Wikipedia for a 'one-up.

Perhaps Drosnin found the Bible Code, perhaps not.  Other pretty smart people believed such was present.  Isaac Newton, it is said, would have been far more fruitful had he not spent much of his time pursuing the Bible code he felt existed.  And, well, WD Gann... he, himself said many times that his knowledge and methods came directly from the Bible.  Gee, I hadn't found those methods in the Bible.  Why, they must be...encoded.  

But the point is not whether or not "The Bible Code," as presented in Drosnin's method, is true or not.  

The point is to inquire and make one's own decision.  To consider, wrestle with the evidence, weigh the results and move forward.  As Lord Bacon once said:

So, I again invited and advised this concerned reader, the Noxious One, not to read my "loony" work. 

I'll sign this essay in red with a challenge to the Noxious One's sense of self importance; explain this (and the other 33 instances in TTTTA):

[Its good to be reminded why one might not want to participate in social media.]

  

ENS 6: Expanding the plan, another error and, perhaps, an "attaboy"

More data is necessary and errors need to be corrected.  Over night I reasoned WD Gann built the prescient message "ens" (interpreted as the USGS Earthquake Notification Service) in his book, "The Tunnel Thru the Air," some 40 times, was to fully demonstrate the pattern of earthquakes according to his mathematic methods.  He is demonstrating a pattern so that we can measure it and apply it; so I imagine it.  Two extremely important words that, if one searched TTTTA on those two words ("measur_" without the 'e' and "pattern") you find nine interesting citations.

Yesterday, 16 earthquakes were researched to reach a conclusion that Mr. Gann  predicted earthquakes that followed the publication of TTTTA.  We need to parse that details of that conclusion.  As usual, I will reprise my many errors in that research, reconsider its basis and then reflect on the results.

First, there were 15 earthquakes, not 16.  Item 12, the March 14, 1903 earthquake, named by Wikipedia as the "1169 Aleppo earthquake," was another of the Excel errors.  The 1169 Aleppo earthquake happened in 1169, not 1903.  Yet I found "Mesopotam_a" (lacking the 'i') and somewhat supporting my conclusion that Mr. Gann foresaw future earthquake events.  This would seem to dispute that conclusion.  Embarrassed, I pondered that. 

In my defense, I phrased my evaluation of the data as having been disappointed that there were missing letters.  That I had expected each target word to have been spelled perfectly as the demonstration of foreknowledge.  But that was before I saw the message that was spelled:

i c u - Q U I C K - c u

There were 11 missing letters of which there were 5 unique letters; q u i c k.  Only 5.  Now, of the 9 missing letters we have 8 so the above message is lacking.  NEVERTHELESS, we still have the same 5 unique letters as there were 2 'i's and now there's 1.  We still have the word "quick."  And beyond that there are 5 and only 5 capitalized letters and they are "QUICK."  The message, in content, is not different from the original interpretation.  

And the message proves the foresight.  That, by far, is the evidence of foresight...not that each target word was spelled entirely correctly.  I do not know how to evaluate "cylinder" proximity with statistical methods as experts have evaluated The Bible Code.  In other words, are the letters close enough to one another to eliminate randomness when searching for a target word, as I did.  In fact, my finding the spelling of "Mesopotamia_a" proves words can be spelled out of enough random letters.  

I argue the persuasive evidence is NOT the spelling of the target word...it is that the absent letters spell the intelligible and relevant...and perhaps timely....message Q-U-I-C-K.  And those cap letters were not for emphasis.  They were capitalized letters that were absent.

So, we now have 15 observations of earthquakes (5 before the publication of TTTTA and 10 after) and yet there are 40 instances of 'ens' (21 times as 'ens' and 19 times as its vertical inversion, 'sne').  Did Mr. Gann intend us to find an additional 25 observations and, if so, why?  

Yes.  Because his intent, in my opinion, was not to simply prove his foresight...it was to provide the measurements of the pattern.  I'm pretty happy with the proof of foresight as presented but the mere presence of the 40 'ens' messages that cannot be correlated with the 15 physical and dated events indicates there is something more.  My instincts tell me the 'something more' is first the ultimate prediction of the event we expect "now" and "QUICK" as developed in the immediately preceding five essays.  And second, a clue, perhaps, to the ultimate mathematic methods.

So, I am expanding the plan.  In the immediately future essays the "plan" will be to supplement the "deadliest earthquakes" since June 22, 1848 (beginning of the MOT) with the most destructive (in dollars) earthquakes and then with the most powerful earthquakes, all according to Wikipedia listings.  Ideally, there will be 40 observations...   Simply stated, we need more data:

And what is the encoded word (in red below) we find surrounding, embracing if you will, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle on page 266?

[I find the numbers highlighted in yellow and bordering the paragraph, serendipitous, to say the least.  But that's me.]

The entire paragraph's narrative is very meaningful, at least to me in my moment of disappointment.  And that's not to mention the great Emerson's "Essay on Compensation."  I truly hope and trust some good comes of this work I so enjoy and that so challenges my imagination.  

Now to the drudgery of ferreting out the data.

Jim Ross 

    

ENS 5: Proof of foresight, the 15 deadliest earthquakes in the MOT period

This posting provides excerpts of the previous essay.  To have an understanding you should have an understanding of the previous four essays.

The short version is four instances of the word "Yellowstone" are found encoded in WD Gann's "Map of Time" which are, therefore, included in his "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  In finding those encoded words, 3 unique letters were missing which may be arranged to spell own, won or now.  The logical conclusion to which one would jump would be "Yellowstone now."  I did but, in light of my "great mistake," I want to consider my bias, delusion, "23 enigma."  I put that up front as a "buyer beware."

The "Yellowstone now" occurrence would suggest the possibility that every deadly earthquake is encoded in TTTTA in a similar manner; might a link prove foresight on Mr. Gann's part of the 16 deadliest earthquakes since the beginning of the MOT on June 22, 1848.  And the answer I found was 'yes.'  Not only did Mr. Gann use the same methodology as he used to create the "Yellowstone now" message, but he left a, presumably personal message; "i c u - QUICK - c u."  To me that means complete my research ASAP.  At least, this phase of my research.  Whatever I'm doing, be timely.

Following is a table of the 16 deadliest earthquakes since June 22, 1848 (the beginning of the MOT), the missing letters of importance and links to each date in TTTTA that finds the name of the earthquake:

[Note regarding #12, see correction below.]

For cut and paste convenience the following is a list of those same screen shot links not correlated with the above table.  This may make it easier for you to see each of the 16 observations.

http://screencast.com/t/oFoesyP6

http://screencast.com/t/PbHbQxyD

http://screencast.com/t/y5jeI4Gg8

http://screencast.com/t/k5ihfs6nJea

http://screencast.com/t/fNA01vnY

http://screencast.com/t/wib2TQ7WMvZC

http://screencast.com/t/aD5eaROPGaLM

http://screencast.com/t/2ToAHC0k

http://screencast.com/t/UocZvnEXv9

http://screencast.com/t/DeNUqqtYc5

http://screencast.com/t/G79YIFawj

http://screencast.com/t/PbXupTr0zd**

http://screencast.com/t/wUZCLKyf

http://screencast.com/t/5ZaZqVChPajM

http://screencast.com/t/bXNi0fp3rK

http://screencast.com/t/bzoUrV6s

You can download the MOT to prove my work to yourself.

As is so frequently the case these days, I have made errors.  My first impression was disappointment over the spellings of the earthquakes missing 1 letter in 11 cases.  That impression was wrong.  After concentrating on each of the above excerpts from TTTTA I find unmistakeable geometry of the letter configurations.  I even found the sides of the Pythagorean triangle in #15 and the right triangle and isosceles of Robert Gordon's seven days (see my many essays on the triangles formed by RG of the east/west and north/south mileages).  [See the comment in yellow on all but one of the screens shots above for the unique feature of each excerpt.]

There are plenty of conspiracy rumors regarding Yellowstone and Pacific Coast seismic activity going around now in the wake of the apparent worldwide increased activity; activity we have not seen in the  lower 48 states of the U.S this year.  There was the one 4.9 earthquake 13 miles from San Francisco on the exact day (February 23, 2016) that I had incorrectly warned would be 'the big one' based on my study of the now 88 year old TTTTA.  Other than that, almost nothing noteworthy in the lower 48.  Here is a well written compilation of the rumors and anxieties that are mounting.

As well there is an amateur seismologist/geologist who I have been following for several weeks and seems to have reached reasonable generalizations about how earthquakes "vibrate" across the globe.  That they work from east to west, where they strike they relieve tectonic pressure that is transferred eastwardly, that the east locations build pressure until it is released...and they tend to strike where there has been an absence of such events.  Here is his blog which yesterday (4/21/2016) featured the buildup of pressure along the Sierra/Nevada border of California (just east of San Francisco).   He also provides a near weekly audio forecast of problem seismic areas.

This is the 288th essay that is published on this blog - the second square of 12.  I did not plan that.  Makes me wonder who, if anyone, is setting the schedule.

Jim Ross

CORRECTION 4/22/2016.  Item 12 is yet another date error.  This item should have been deleted from this list.  It was missing an 'i' and therefore the message "i c u QUICK cu" is incorrect.  There is only one 'i' and therefore the message can only be restricted to the single word "QUICK."  I do not consider this error to detract from the validity of the conclusions.  Future essays will delete this error and refer only to 15 observations.

ENS 4: Proof of foresight achieved....and a chilling message

First a warning regarding yesterday's essay.  Out of the 52 deadliest earthquakes, there are 16 that have occurred since the beginning of the WD Gann "Map of Time" that I have identified in "The Tunnel Thru the Air;" not 22 or 21.  Excel interpreted years before 1/1/1900 as dates occurring after that date.  The year 432 AD was interpreted as December 7, 1900 which is wrong.

Now the urgency.  In a very long day yesterday, I researched the 16 earthquakes and was largely disappointed. Only a circumstances identified might be considered possible "proof" that Mr. Gann foresaw these 16 earthquakes.  Additional research is needed on the 16 so only the data will be provided for now with a trail to the logic.  The importance of this post is the findings of the last hour.

Following are the 16 earthquakes and results of research into each:

Methodology.  For each of 16 dates the proximate acrostic and telestic letters were searched for the letters that would comprise the locations for that location's name.  For example, item 1 was the July 28, 1976 Tangshan earthquake.  It is the first, worst and a simple successful example.  [In retrospect, I consider the exercise a disappointment until completion and I came upon a realization I'll disclose in this essay.]

The exact line of the earthquake was identified on the MOT and the date was highlighted in green, the proximate acrostic and telestic letters were searched for each letter in "Tangshan."  Each time I discover a letter it was highlighted in green.  The screenshot for this example is modified following:

Every letter in "Tangshan" was found in a matrix that extended from the date upward 11 lines and downward 9 lines; a matrix of 11X9.  Its a fairly compact area, but not dispositive.  It was a tad disappointing.  

Observation #1.  During the work three items were noteworthy and they are highlighted in red.  There were other noteworthy items but these three jumped out; 7, 13 and 16.

First, Item 7 had a matrix of 15X0.  The entire word was spelled above the date.  Second, Item 13 had a matrix of 0X21.  The entire word could be spelled with every letter below the date.  Third, Item 10 had the entire first word, "Gansu," of two words spelled above the date (except the 'u') and the second word, "China," spelled below the date.

This is not random.

Observation #2.  I was disappointed in the column in the first table of results that is headed "Missing."  Of the 16 observations, there were 5 that were missing 1 letter each.  I expected perfection of Mr. Gann.  He is redeemed and then exceeded my exceptions in "Observation 3."

Observation #3.  This is alarming.  Recall the results of the Yellowstone question.  The four findings of Yellowstone encoded in TTTTA are missing five letters, three of which are unique; o-w-n.  They spell three words; own, won and now.  Yellowstone and 'now.'  Chilling.

And so it was, when I completed my 16th item in the table above this morning, I looked to the missing letters and wondered if the method of encoding would repeat.  Look at the letters in the column which is headed "Missing:"

u-u-K-i-U-C-c-i-c-Q-u

There are eleven letters missing in attempts to spell the locations of earthquakes according to the method outlined above.

Of those eleven letters you can distribute them in the below table from the "Missing letters" column to the three columns on the right:

Mr. Gann has given us a message.  It gives a salutation, then a message, and a closing:

i c u - QUICK - c u

Is the message telling ME to act with urgency?

Those messages are in the correct upper and lower cases (absent errors I may have made).  There is one left over "u" which, again, may imply an error on my part or untidiness on Mr. Gann's part.

Conclusions:  Three conclusions

• The 16 earthquake observations demonstrate modest evidence of foresight,

• Missing letters spelling an intelligible and relevant message provides, in my opinion, conclusive evidence of foresight, not only of my recent work, but the exact dates of 16 earthquakes that occurred in the MOT period, and 

• In the context of the most recent two essay concerning Yellowstone and "now," the message of this device is "QUICK"

In the context of these last four essays, this one included, and the essays in the series leading up to the "great mistake".......  I am very worried about the near future.

Jim Ross