Friday, April 22, 2016

ENS 6: Expanding the plan, another error and, perhaps, an "attaboy"

More data is necessary and errors need to be corrected.  Over night I reasoned WD Gann built the prescient message "ens" (interpreted as the USGS Earthquake Notification Service) in his book, "The Tunnel Thru the Air," some 40 times, was to fully demonstrate the pattern of earthquakes according to his mathematic methods.  He is demonstrating a pattern so that we can measure it and apply it; so I imagine it.  Two extremely important words that, if one searched TTTTA on those two words ("measur_" without the 'e' and "pattern") you find nine interesting citations.

Yesterday, 16 earthquakes were researched to reach a conclusion that Mr. Gann  predicted earthquakes that followed the publication of TTTTA.  We need to parse that details of that conclusion.  As usual, I will reprise my many errors in that research, reconsider its basis and then reflect on the results.

First, there were 15 earthquakes, not 16.  Item 12, the March 14, 1903 earthquake, named by Wikipedia as the "1169 Aleppo earthquake," was another of the Excel errors.  The 1169 Aleppo earthquake happened in 1169, not 1903.  Yet I found "Mesopotam_a" (lacking the 'i') and somewhat supporting my conclusion that Mr. Gann foresaw future earthquake events.  This would seem to dispute that conclusion.  Embarrassed, I pondered that. 

In my defense, I phrased my evaluation of the data as having been disappointed that there were missing letters.  That I had expected each target word to have been spelled perfectly as the demonstration of foreknowledge.  But that was before I saw the message that was spelled:

i c u - Q U I C K - c u

There were 11 missing letters of which there were 5 unique letters; q u i c k.  Only 5.  Now, of the 9 missing letters we have 8 so the above message is lacking.  NEVERTHELESS, we still have the same 5 unique letters as there were 2 'i's and now there's 1.  We still have the word "quick."  And beyond that there are 5 and only 5 capitalized letters and they are "QUICK."  The message, in content, is not different from the original interpretation.  

And the message proves the foresight.  That, by far, is the evidence of foresight...not that each target word was spelled entirely correctly.  I do not know how to evaluate "cylinder" proximity with statistical methods as experts have evaluated The Bible Code.  In other words, are the letters close enough to one another to eliminate randomness when searching for a target word, as I did.  In fact, my finding the spelling of "Mesopotamia_a" proves words can be spelled out of enough random letters.  

I argue the persuasive evidence is NOT the spelling of the target word...it is that the absent letters spell the intelligible and relevant...and perhaps timely....message Q-U-I-C-K.  And those cap letters were not for emphasis.  They were capitalized letters that were absent.

So, we now have 15 observations of earthquakes (5 before the publication of TTTTA and 10 after) and yet there are 40 instances of 'ens' (21 times as 'ens' and 19 times as its vertical inversion, 'sne').  Did Mr. Gann intend us to find an additional 25 observations and, if so, why?  

Yes.  Because his intent, in my opinion, was not to simply prove his foresight...it was to provide the measurements of the pattern.  I'm pretty happy with the proof of foresight as presented but the mere presence of the 40 'ens' messages that cannot be correlated with the 15 physical and dated events indicates there is something more.  My instincts tell me the 'something more' is first the ultimate prediction of the event we expect "now" and "QUICK" as developed in the immediately preceding five essays.  And second, a clue, perhaps, to the ultimate mathematic methods.

So, I am expanding the plan.  In the immediately future essays the "plan" will be to supplement the "deadliest earthquakes" since June 22, 1848 (beginning of the MOT) with the most destructive (in dollars) earthquakes and then with the most powerful earthquakes, all according to Wikipedia listings.  Ideally, there will be 40 observations...   Simply stated, we need more data:


And what is the encoded word (in red below) we find surrounding, embracing if you will, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle on page 266?


[I find the numbers highlighted in yellow and bordering the paragraph, serendipitous, to say the least.  But that's me.]

The entire paragraph's narrative is very meaningful, at least to me in my moment of disappointment.  And that's not to mention the great Emerson's "Essay on Compensation."  I truly hope and trust some good comes of this work I so enjoy and that so challenges my imagination.  

Now to the drudgery of ferreting out the data.

Jim Ross 
    


9 comments:

  1. Hi Jim,

    just some random annagramming:

    DISTRUSTFUL FORESEE OF SKY(S) DATA ADAPTORS,
    with "fhhhWww" being left over.

    Btw. there is a "taito" on the left side,
    followed by a "tao" which i've seen often - maybe a device like toa" ?

    Wikipedia:
    TAO
    -> Taoism
    -> Chinese -> Way,Path,Route.
    -> "Tao is the intuitive knowing of life"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, I replied to your message and hope you correlated that. I continue to forget to hit the reply button. Hard to teach an old dog...

      Jim

      Delete
  2. I am so bad at anagramming. Thank you for the "distrustful foresee of sky data adaptors." My anti global warming bias would have me relate that first to the semblance's of what happened in "climate gate."

    Taito (a subdivision of Tokyo) is a great find. As you recall, that word, perfectly spelled as an acrostic in the Foreword, led me to the February 23, 2016 prediction and 'great mistake.' It somehow fits in but I just don't know how...yet.

    Tao is of immense importance in two regards. It is "path" as I developed extensively in the "TAO to WAR" essays. But is also a jumbling of the message "aot" which I believe to be "act of terror." There is a series of "aot" messages that may be, and I expect are, predictive of terror attacks.

    Tao appears, believe it or not, 69 times in TTTTA. The most important message I have discover begins on line 2699 on page 68, spans page 69 (which is meaningful) and ends with WAR on page 71 line 2858. Perfectly, mathematically in between is the word "to" spelled acrostically on page 69 line 2780 (chapter line 360) adjacent to the paragraph "I believe there was a secret meaning in what he said...." Read that paragraph, it is incredible.

    Tao is of immense importance as is 69.

    Thank you so much for your contribution and considering,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  3. Interesting. I took AOT to be TOA. As in "soh cah toa" in trigonometry. I figured it was part of a triangle using the SOH and CAH as the other points to dates in the MOT.

    Possibly a clue to how this all works.

    Steve

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did as well. When I counted, there were instances of TOA (tangent=opposite over adjacent) and SOH (sine-opposite over Hypotenuse) but there weren't any CAH's (cosine=adjacent over hypotenuse). I reasoned that if you have two of the three and one side length, you don't need the third.

      I haven't spent time on aot or toa recently either from the terrorist or geometry standpoint and I have not proven either direction, not that they are mutually exclusive. It may well be the correlation between events, be they earthquakes or terrorist acts may be the geometry marked by toa or soh.

      Now to continue studying the 1989 Loma Prieta quake. Feel free to release me from the tedium any time...

      Jim

      Delete
    2. I find three "CAH"s.

      Lines 10993, 6864, 3976

      Steve

      Delete
    3. Hmmm, maybe it was TOA's I didn't find? Maybe my MOT wasn't working right way back then. Maybe I was on NZT (like Limitless).

      T_anks,

      Jim

      Delete
    4. I find all three. SOH COH TOA. A different number of each. No idea why. Definitely worth investigating.

      Steve

      Delete
    5. Not sure what I was doing wrong because I clearly remember being perplexed that I found instances of only 2 out of the 3. It was early on in my development of the MOT so my "Finder" may not have been hitting on all cylinders.

      I agree. It really does imply to me it is the math/geometry of the predictive process. And it deserves work. And I have a tab that's been on my spreadsheet (along with about 50 more) reserving future work.

      Jim

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.