So, if John Dee were so important to WD Gann, and by association, the number 252 important, why don't we find any artifact in TTTTA as testimony? Its there.
I have not shared the weekly "Map of Time" but have described its arrangement. Simply "appoint" 20 seconds for a day. The problem that will confront you is you will run out of time in a week (168 hours in a week X 60 minutes X 60 seconds / 20 seconds = 30240) before you fill up 15341 lines down and another 15341 lines up. Its 15341 X 2 = 30682 minus 30240 = 442.
Pondering the discrepancy, you will figure out the weekly MOT is a 168-hour lunar calendar product where the 168-year solar calendar product. The 442 line difference between weekly and annual MOTs represents the difference between the year's we think of as 360 days and 365.242 days.
As I awoke this morning, I knew how Dee fit in. His philosopher stone number is the lunar extrapolation within the MOT:
Dee's philosopher stone number explains the line difference between the weekly and annually MOTs. 252 reflects the math of the lunar calendar (with some thought you'll realize the 7-day lunar MOT perfectly fits with 7 24-hour days without any difference).
Something else fits in; its WD Gann's philosopher stone number, 432. That number is the number of pages of TTTTA when counting the cover, blank pages, inside title page, dedication page, copyright page, Foreword pages, rear flap. With this number and the 15341 lines in the MOT you have the number of days in the solar calendar to within two decimals.
Once one has created the weekly-lunar MOT, what do you do with the extra 442 lines? Well, I picked a starting point based on TTTTA and then rolled the weekly MOT forward 168 years from that starting point. That's 168 years X 52 weeks per year or thereabouts.
What I then find is that at EXACTLY 84 years of half the 168-year, the first weekly-lunar MOT of the 84th year begins on line 1 a the same minute of the same day of the week as the first weekly-lunar MOT EXCEPT, its PM rather than AM. The week-lunar MOT at 84 years REPEATS, but for the difference of day and night.
Stunning, at least to me. Because I did the work on "WD Gann's Sixth Manifest Prophecy," the AM versus PM hits me hard.
WD Gann predicted the 9/11 attacks in minute detail, down to the day and the minute EXCEPT; the attack on the Mammouth Building (for goodness sakes, doesn't it strike anyone that the 110-story Mammouth Building as horrifically prescient) began at 8PM while Muhammad Ata departed Logan International Airport at 7:59AM. It was the difference of opposites; the difference of night and day. WD Gann had predicted to within one minute the attack on the World Trade Center, but for the difference of night and day. I now understand what others might consider an error. Its a detail Mr. Watson, a detail.
Extrapolate the weekly lunar MOT another 84 years an that MOT will begin with the same minute of the same day of the week as the very first weekly lunar MOT that began the sequence 168 years there prior. And it will be the same time of day; AM versus AM or PM versus PM.
84 years or 1/30th the Biblical Great Week of prophecy, 168 years or 1/15th of the same. They are the anniversaries that "square" the daily (earth axis determined), lunar and solar calendars.
*** ***
I awoke this morning noting the correlation of John Dee's philosopher stone number 252 with the 15120 lines in the weekly lunar MOT and the prominent 440 difference (noting the two line rounding I interjected) relative to the annual solar MOT.
Yesterday, I awoke with the thought that the 15341 lines of the annual solar MOT might reflect the latitude of the earth at the face angle of the Great Pyramid of Giza. And we 15341 is the circumference of the Earth at 51.5* latitude....the face angle of the Great Pyramid. I guess I could rationalize the weekly lunar MOT, within acceptable error, reflects the face angle of the Great Pyramid as well, but that does not seem an adequate distinction for the 440 lunar-solar difference.
There is a finer distinction. What is the ancient measurement of the base side dimension of the Great Pyramid of Giza?
440 cubits.
Waxing thoughtful, the Great Pyramid of Giza, WD Gann's virtual Pyramid of Math is founded on the prophetic difference between the the daily (earth's axis), weekly (lunar) and annual (solar) calendars and the prophetic periods that square them. Sleep on that.
Jim Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.