Mile marking "RG's seven days" with false encoded messages and a monument "bookend" message

I'm always skeptical of my reading of acrostic and telestic messages that I have found in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  Not so much because they are statistically doubtful that they are messages.  Rather, its because however intended, my interpretation....no, anyone's interpretation of language is always a subjective exercise of convenience.  The conveyor may not accurately phrase his intention, the receiver, having received an accurate message may not interpret it correctly.

To compound the problem, I believe many messages were crafted by Mr. Gann to teach and ingrain that realization in his messages.  Following is a recent series of intended false messages that I have discovered.

The background; I have converted the "Map of Time" from a 168-year basis (which assumes 365.242 days per year or lunar year) to a 168-hour basis (which assumes a lunar 360-day year).  I've done this to find where on the MOT the 22 stops during Robert Gordon's seven days fall; what day, hour and mileage.  As a preliminary test of my conversion, I'm looking for an encoded message that confirms I have found the correct location.

On pages 393 and 394, Mr. Gann tells us Robert Gordon left NYC at about 7a.m. on July 20, 1932 and "in a little over three hours later he was over London."  That's 10a.m. RG's time (NYC time, not London time).  So I look to my newly converted MOT for 10a.m. or thereabouts and find:

On exactly 10a.m. line 541, I find artifacts that suggest I'm at the right place and the converted MOT is correct.  "Eureka," much as Archimedes cried, Mr. Gann left his initials (in red) and "MOT" in blue to tell me point blank I'd found the time RG arrived over London.  But on further reflection, the "WDGn" is abbreviated, as if misspelled.  I'd have felt better if he left it at "WDG" rather than infer the missing 'a' and 'n.'  Line 541 is exactly 10a.m. where Mr. Gann said RG arrived "in a little 3 hours later" or after 10a.m.  This can't be the correct time despite the acrostic 'circumstance.'  I felt short changed and had some suspicion I had not found the correct time.

With my half-empty glass (accountants, by their skeptic nature always have a glass half-empty as opposed to half-full), I look for acrostic/telestic encoding of the 3739 east-west miles of RG's trip and on line 3739 find:

On line 3739 (in green) I find one of the first acrostic messages in my two-year adventure; I find on that line the 'M' of the acrostic word "Map" (in red).  As well, I find "The" (in blue) and "Time" (in tan).  Double "Eureka," its like shooting fish in a barrel.  But....on reflection, I'm missing "of" in the "Map of Time."  And its really not a very specific confirmation.  I remain half empty.  I keep looking.

I'll give one more example of an intentional wrong message but without the calculation of how I arrived at line 3205.  I did arrive at line 3205 based a mileage from the spreadsheet of RG's trip and found the following:

"London" spelled in blue.  And "Ross" spelled in red.  It's exactly what I'd envisioned as the happy ending.  That I'd compute the correct miles and location of the end of the first trip in the MOT and WD Gann would have spelled the word "London."  Wrong again.  The word London has a vertical gap between the "n" on line 3209 and the "n" on line 3211.  The letters are not vertically contiguous.  And the word "Ross."  The "o" is not the letter "o" but the digit "0."  This is an imperfect word as well.

After long reflection, I have determined all of the above are false confirmations designed to test my understanding of the lessons I've been taught.  There were more, perhaps a dozen false calculations that led either to locations where there were not perfect messages similar to the above or not any messages.

*** ***

Since this long learning process I have come to the point of understanding that verbal messages do not convey perfect truth.  I determined that if I wanted confirmation, I had to find the true mathematic formula that specified the exact time and the exact spacial location of RG's having arrived in London.  And I did, or, pending backtesting in the market, I have.  Its mathematic and doesn't need an "attaboy" encoded message.  Math is true and one knows when it is perfect.

Its the debits = credits moment that an accountant, such as I am, always sought after having extracted data from a general ledger system and reflecting it in an articulated set of financial statements.  The math must work and I found that moment.  The circle in time and the square in space are individually and relationally perfect.

I now have the perfect math that will emblazon on the exact lines of the MOT the "when" (the seconds from the 7a.m. origin) of RG's arrival at 22 stops during RG's seven days and the "where" (the miles from NYC origin).

I sat there with my wife watching a Hallmark holiday 'feel good' seasonal offering and briefed over mis-numbered chapter 39 and was struck reciprocating messages that bookend that chapter.  First I saw "Math:"

The above is the last paragraph of RG's seven days and sports the "in your face" word "Math."  The "M" is capitalized as if to challenge your disbelief even further.  I discovered this word long ago but did not understand.

The story is incomplete; its just a 'coincidental' word, even if dramatic.  Let's look at the "single-deep path" of this word.  The letter 'a' of 'Math' is on ascending chapter line number 354 and the single-deep path is to line 10; both digits highlighted in green above.  What do we find on or about descending line number 10 in the below?

Preceding or above descending chapter line 10 you have "ROss" in perfect symmetry and vertically contiguous.  Below line 10 you have "Law" with the "L" capitalized, the letters perfectly vertically sequenced.  "Ross" and "Law" are symmetrically arranged vertically above and below line 10.  The words that bookend Robert Gordon's seven days are:

Ross - Math - Law*

"Robert Gordon's seven days;" the lesson which Mr. Gann asserts, if learned, entitles that student to  "understanding" of enumerated great mysteries.  My take, "Math is Law."

Time and space are reciprocal and determined; mathematically and divinely, in my opinion.

If my backtesting in Mr. Gann's "laboratory," the NYSE, proves my understanding, I will provide market proof.

Jim Ross

* The message may elaborated in far greater detail using other devices (the Tao device) and especially referencing John Dee.  I've purposefully kept this discussion concise and simple.