WD Gann's "Great Pyramid of Math" is "Robert Gordon's Seven Days"

The numbers aren't new; Phi, Pi, Root 2, Euler's constant.  We've known for more than a century, the physical structure the Great Pyramid of Giza enshrines the first three of those four mystical numbers (there are, of course, more great numbers found in the Great Pyramid).  And the fourth number, Euler's constant (2.71828), well, we (Rick Howard that is) only discovered its inclusion in the Great Pyramid two decades.  Heck, we didn't discover about Euler's constant until the 18th century...the ancients knew that number 5000 years ago.

Those four great numbers comprise the mathematic structure of "Robert Gordon's Seven Days," the intentionally mis-numbered Chapter 34 (shown as XXXIX).   The stakes are high according to WD Gann as he sets the stage in the Foreword to "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  I subjectively extract from the Foreword; a person will conquer his greatest enemy, Death, understand why Jesus rose after 3 days, be able to understand the future as if an open book, IF he or she has an understanding of "Robert Gordon's seven days."

In RG's seven days, RG circumnavigated the globe in seven days beginning in New York and completing (reaching the longitude from which he started) the circle in Montreal exactly 7 days later.  During his trip, RG destroyed the great buildings of the world, including pyramids of Mexico.  Curiously, RG visits the Great Pyramid but does not destroy it, noting his belief of its "divine purpose."

More than two years ago and having since spent 100s of hours detailing the 22 points (stops) along the RG's trip and the 21 intervals between them, I've often become lost in the trees.  Not that the trees are unimportant.  I'll simplify the math and focus to a point of understanding in the below spreadsheet excerpt.

As a result of RG's seven days, I understood Mr. Gann contrived the trip to force the purely east/west miles of the trip at the average latitude of New York City and Montreal to equal (substantially) the north/south miles of that same trip.  Follow the link to the updated table that summarizes the trip and note the east/west mileage of 18222 miles (highlighted in red) and north/south mileage of 18161 miles (also highlighted in red).  What are the odds?

If you followed the link above, its a very busy spreadsheet; too many trees for the moment.  I needed to step back.  And here's what I found:

I think the above articulates the derivations adequately.  I'll let you "do the math."

So simple.  From the east/west mileage (which is also contrived to be the north/south mileage) of RG's trip and the spherical circumference of the Earth, one can derive the four numbers found in the divine plan of the Great Pyramid of Giza.

*** ***

We see only distances in the above so we might think we're dealing with only a spherical or three-dimension model.  Make the connection; equatorial distance not only provides a measurement of distance but of time given Earth's rotational motion.  From a point on the equator in both in time, the motion the Earth records the distance that point travels and the time that point traveled.  We think of time and distance separately.  They appear to be so because time appears, in our gravity well of Earth and 'special relativity,' to be the constant; it is measured as the constant.  Einstein provided both time and space are malleable.  I submit we will find them as predictably reciprocating; vibratory.  Two opposing forces, time and space; reciprocally vibrating, arbitrated by a neutral force, gravitation.  And according to perfect mathematical structure.

Since the above are the distances traveled during RG's seven days, I expect the interrelationships of the four derived numbers will prove to be the key to the mathematic structure of TTTTA.... except for one element.  Any measurement must occur in reference to a point of beginning; a point of relativity.

Physicists I suppose, not being one, see those numbers in the context of 'how far is it,' 'how long will it take to get there,' 'what will be the reaction,' ....  There's a missing ingredient that, again I suppose, analytical scientists (as opposed to the 'correlationists' of the Gaussian pseudo science known as statistics) do not consider; history repeats.  Far too Biblical for the modern analytical scientist to consider; that mathematics predicts the future.  Predestination is so anti science, or at least, that is how I perceive modern science.  That's the missing element.  

Only simple minds, such as mine, would choose to believe at least one missing element would come from the Bible.  I'd argue Mr. Gann found all of those elements of spacetime in the Bible; how many times did WD Gann say that in TTTTA alone?  If you have to look that one up, I'd suggest you may have read TTTTA three times but have not "observed it."  

If you combine the above relations among the transcendental numbers to define the exact formula for intervals (both in time and in distance) all that is missing in understanding WD Gann's "Map of Time," the MOT, is the perfect "starting point."

We have the Great Pyramid of Giza that confronts modern science and mathematics as something that could not have been known by ancients.  5000 years later and now 90 years ago we have WD Gann's "Great Pyramid of Math" that will become, in my opinion, a mathematic explanation of spacetime in conditions of Einstein's 'special relativity.'  I believe this will be proven.

The question that leaps at me now is, what became of the civilization that created the Great Pyramid of Giza monument to spacetime when this knowledge was, presumably, attained by them?  Is there a truth in that question; did Mr. Gann provide us testimony to having seen that truth?

Jim Ross