Interval within an interval...and an error

Two intervals in two essays found independently but...  They they seem interrelated.  I discovered that last night and woke up with it this morning.  As well, I discovered an apparent error or inconsistency in the latter of those two essays.  From the line structure of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" the mathematic vertical line structure exhibited in the "Map of Time" allowed Mr. Gann to place meaningful words and messages at mathematically related locations in the MOT.  The question arises, can there be "intervals with intervals" just as Mr. Gann (and the Bible) said there are wheels within wheels.

Emma, Ray and San Andreas.  The first of the referenced two essays is Emma, Ray and San Andreas, let's call it "ERS" for short.  It gave us the endpoints of Ray on line 145, Emma on line 12216 and the computed midpoint of 6181.  And 6181 is the exact midpoint of seven perfectly aligned, contiguous letters that spell Andreas.  Hardly coincidental I claim.  Emma, Ray and San Andreas are the prime characters of the 2015 movie named after the great geologic fault.  Mr. Gann knew that movie.

The Third Confirmation of YHWH and Isaiah 9:10.  The second of the essays is the Third Confirmation of YHWH and Isaiah 9:10.  Let's call it the "Confirmation Interval."  The endpoints were defined as "San" at line 82 and "Andreas" at line 6184 with a "Halfway" of 3051; a line of multiple meanings.  First, it was roughly the center of an message which, when combined with the message on a related page, produced an incredibly detailed message of behavior, judgement and consequence.  Second, line 3051 is aligned perfectly in the middle of a paragraph that is a key to prediction of the future, in my opinion (an essay for another day).  And third and most dramatic, that singular line, when the dates of the left of the MOT and the right of the MOT are recomposed, give you the day October 8, 1865; the date of the "Great San Francisco Earthquake.

Those are the intervals that give a mathematic "interval within an interval" and also show my error.

The interval within the interval.  Perhaps you've already imagined it.  The ERS interval is roughly 12200 lines long and the Third Confirmation interval is roughly 6200 lines long; nearly double.  Parse it down to the following math which is summarized from the two essays:

The midpoint of ERS is the endpoint of the Third Confirmation (6181 vs 6184).  The Third Confirmation interval defined by the ERS interval.  Somewhat, an "interval within and interval."

The error.  Computed consistently, we'd expect the "midpoint" of the Third Confirmation on line 3133 (page 77), but I misdefined the line for which I was evaluating as 3051 (page 76) which turned out very significant.  

Still, the result found at 3051 is too noteworthy to ignore as somehow not entirely 'unintended.'  I look at how I describe line 3051 in the math of the Third Confirmation essay; as "Halfway."  Not midpoint.  Technically, I'm not mathematically incorrect but inconsistent.  As a former accountant/auditor both 'incorrect' and 'inconsistent' seem the same but they aren't entirely.

The interrelation of the intervals.  The larger ERS interval defines Emma, Ray and San Andreas, a contemporary movie that imposes a personal crisis amid a greater crisis (as many movies do).  Within the ERS interval we find the Third Confirmation interval of half the line dimension adding color; Biblical (the prediction), spacial (where it occurs), temporal (when in the past and when in the future).  It happened in San Francisco exactly October 8, 1865 and will happen again in about calendar time (October 13-19) in 2016.  The extent will be as described in section of the message pertaining to Atlantis and PGE.  I'll leave that to you to imagine.

The interrelation between the messages.  The twice larger ERS interval creates the "big picture" of San Andreas.  The half size Third Confirmation interval provides the details, the color of the same subject.

*** ***

An error?  I've had people ask me if I made this or that error to create a mystery and make the reader struggle with a concept.  I have no doubt Mr. Gann did that, none whatsoever.  I don't.  I write this stuff as I discover it.  No mystery there.

I can't dismiss the, at least, overlapping intervals which I believe are more than that, an interval that defines a smaller interval.  The larger was designed to lead to the smaller or, if the smaller were to be discovered first, the smaller leads to the larger.  That would be a great way for an ingenious author to lead a reader through a series of mysteries....like a map.

AND/OR, it might have implications about how cycles work.  Perhaps a greater interval defines an endpoint of a smaller interval.  In my error, I absentmindedly used the first line of the MOT as opposed to the 82nd line of the MOT to derive the 'halfway' point or line number 3051 which was found meaningful.  If I'd used the correct line number 82 to find the comparable/consistently derived line 3133, I'm not sure there's anything meaningful on line 3133 (though I have not concentrated on that line and related page).  

Which has me thinking, for the umpteenth time, what is the proper starting point.... and therefore correct midpoint?  And where would that question be raised...pages 76 and 77:

The "correct starting point."  Is the inconsistency I created, in yielding a meaningful result, a clue?  I just don't know.

Jim Ross