Proving "Pecos" and Message 1

Message 1, as far as it was developed on September 2, 2016, did not identify Pecos Texas.  My work identified Brownsville, El Paso, Rio Grande, all as signs of approaching seismic activity, but the exact site of the sign, that being Pecos, Texas, was not identified.

If WD Gann intended to predict the September 6, 2016 Pecos, Texas earthquake, why didn't he encode the word in TTTTA?  He did, and at two levels.

Level 1.  Let's clarify the name of Pecos.  Having worked with municipalities for several years the formal names are typically (not always) in the form of the "City of Pecos" or the "Town of Pecos."  In this case, the formal name is "Town of Pecos City" but the website gives us "Pecos, Texas."  I could accept "Town of Pecos," "Pecos City," and "Pecos, Texas."  Simply Pecos, well, that's not good enough.

Its easy to find Pecos, TX, just search for an "x" in the "finder" spreadsheet of the WD Gann "Map of Time" download and evaluate the surrounding letters.  If there isn't a proximate "P" then go to the next "x."  Keep doing it until you find all the letters located contiguously and you'll find two occurrences of "Pecos, TX."  Pretty simple, every letter located contiguously (on consecutive vertical lines).  Look for the red and yellow acrostic/telestic letters at line 13802:

and line 5092:

Level 2.  That was like shooting fish in a barrel; it was too easy.  If Mr. Gann meant "Pecos City" in message 1 why did he not put it there?  That would be proof he foresaw an earthquake on the date identified, September 6, at Pecos.  He did.  Twice.  I missed it.

I'll give myself a pass on missing it.  Brownsville, El Paso, Rio Grande were all in the narrative so I'd naturally look for them.  Pecos City doesn't exactly ring any bells for me.  In retrospect, well, "Pecos" has got to be in message 1 if Mr. Gann intended us to find it.  Again, he did and he did it twice.

Message 1 is a long message and demonstrating it will be challenging.  So, I'll provide a 'before' and an 'after' of the message 1 spreadsheet.  On the left of the black border is the 'before,' with all the colorful letter deriving words.  On the right, every colored letter was converted to grey.

Hard to read?  Its the best I can do.  Besides, you have access to WD Gann's "Map of Time" available for download free.  You can do it yourself and you should for two reasons.  I make errors.  More importantly, you won't believe it unless you do it.  From the man-centered bias that all things are random, its too easy to write it off with the ignorant "any words can be spelled if you have an infinity of letters."  Duh, there's a finite number of letters.

Above in red you have "Pecos" and a second time in blue you have "Pecos."  A problem arose with "City.;" there wasn't an "i."  In orange, the very first line of the right side above, you'll see 9 = i.  The '9' of the page at the upper right can be either an 'r' or an 'i' according to the Pythagorean table.  That '9' was used on the left side of the above as an 'R' in the spelling of 'Rift.'  But it was not used as an 'i.'  It is the missing letter in 'C9ty' or 'City.'

Add one more word, 'at' comprised of the unused 'a' at line 10824 and the unused 't' at line 10802 and the more fully articulated message 1 becomes:

[Note the word 'do' above was not in the original message but was identified in the original spreadsheet and in the original essay (in tan) and was inadvertently left out of the translated message.]

*** ***

WD Gann predicted the site of the September 6, 2016 warning signal, the 3.5M earthquake at Pecos City, Texas.  How many times did I look at message 1 before I published the result on September 2, 2016 and not see 'Pecos City?'  I saw the letters but not the meaning.  Do we see the signs and not see the meaning?

"I saw but I did not observe," Watson might be heard speaking to Holmes.

If you are in the path of the events that I believe are predicted for October 13-19, 2016, the seven days of October, then I’d encourage you to download the MOT, do the work, prove me correct or incorrect, agree or disagree with my conclusions and then take action as appropriate.

There are exactly 37 days separating September 6, 2016 and the October 13 onset of the "seven days of October."  If you do not understand the number 37, then you have a lot of research before you.  A number the significance of which predates Pythagoras.  If you want a contemporary synchronicity of that number, what was the sum of Nicholas Cage' license plate in the movie "Knowing?"

Jim Ross