Similarly, I am confounded by the number 22544, let's call it the 'riddle number,' that confronted me last week and which I first attributed to WD Gann's prediction of a closing high in the Dow Industrials on Friday October 13, 2017:
Amid the above terribly busy prediction of Dow Industrials printing an "ATTH" or all-time trading high or intraday high on October 13, 2017 (which it did), there is a conspicuous unused five letters in the heart of the above excerpt. They are t-t-n-d-m which, converted to digits via Luo Clements (who is a pen name for WD Gann) table of Pythagorean values is 22544. That was my second explanation of those 5 digits; that they are a meaningful link to a line in the "Map of Time." Obviously, the Dow did not collapse to close at 22544 so I'll give you my perceived second explanation now. This second of the two above riddles might answer the first.
Astrologers who wish to break down a number to a degree on the zodiac, lets say the riddle number 22544, will divide it by 360 degrees and eliminate the whole or completed orbits:
On the left is how I, not even having risen to the level of novice astronomer, understand the calculation of the plotting of the number 22544 on the zodiac.
On the right is a similar calculation using using the number of lines in the MOT as the proxy for 360 degrees in the circle with a remainder of 7203. I interpret that as line number 7203 on the ascending cumulative line column OR its counterpart number, 8138.
I go to the former location 7203 (in blue) on the MOT:
I see nothing, at least at the moment, of significance in the acrostic/telestic encoding or in the narrative.
I go to the latter location 8139 (in blue) and find the Issachar riddle:
The riddle number brings me (I don't say 'us' because you might not accept the line 'path' I've derived) to confront the Issachar riddle. And here's the answer I'll posit pending further research:
Robert did not know Issachar's birth number to determine if he was of the same Zodiac sign as himself. The only thing Robert knew was Issachar's name. And the name number was the same. Now to compute the numbers of the names of the other 11 tribes to confirm or deny they are, each, unique with respect to one another.
Why might I perceive (or delude myself of) these things? Perhaps I am of the same "atomic" classification. I was born on the 21st day of the month and my forename is James. Compute the concatenated birth and forename number.
*** ***
Perhaps we have some elaboration of Luo Clement's methods. Luo would have us create a person's or thing's unique birth number and forename number. Their concatenation tells us much about the character, the vibration of a person. Absent the birth date, as in the case of Issachar, perhaps the two-digit reflection of the subject's forename gives us identification.
Remember from the Ticker Interview, stocks are like atoms with their unique vibration. Atoms and the Periodic Table, atoms of similar classes, determined by weight, behave similarly. People and things (like the NYSE) will adopt the behavior of their "number" categories. If you can assign the "number" based only on the forename, you have a solution.
Luo Clement laments in his "first book of instruction" that a person cannot change his birth number but can influence his fate by adopting a harmonious forename. Perhaps its more than that.
Luo promised us the "second book of instruction" named "Numerical Vibrations" which was never published. Or was it? I have preliminary anagram evidence found in Luo's 1909 book that the 1927 TTTTA is the second book of instruction. And as I've offered much evidence, Luo Clement is a pen name of WD Gann.
The two-digit forename number may well be a numerologic principle of this second book of instruction. Much yet to be done.
Jim Ross
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.