ENS 12: Proving the message

In WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air," did Mr. Gann intend the message:

Mea culpa.  Despite my "reconciliation" of letters from the 56 available to the 38 used and unused (accountants like to "reconcile"), I gave the above message credit for one too many 'a' s.  The Inc_ is missing an 'a' reflective of this error.  It disappoints me greatly that the message seems incomplete, but that is the record.  I will post a notation of the euro to ENS 11 but, generally, if the essay has been out there a day, its an error that's in the record.  As if Mr. Gann knew he spelled Inca incorrectly, he later spelled "Inca" perfectly in an acrostic word that I cite as proof below.  Something lost, something gained.  Maybe a concept emphasized at the expense of my having made an error.  As if that's unique.

Did Mr. Gann provide a web of interrelated concepts that color the above supposed message derived from the 56 letters that were missing in spelling the 45 greatest earthquakes in the WD Gann "Map of Time" period of 168 years?  If so, then the inference is that a similar fate, "Yellowstone - Now" will occur some time soon.

What is the proof?  For me, the threshold of proof is low.  I've experienced miracles during my last two years' study of TTTTA; coincidences of such mathematic improbability they cannot be considered other than miracles.  You saw miracles of prediction if you've read Mr. Gann's prediction of 9/11 found in the 6th prophecy or followed its discovery in the MOT according to the similar method used in a contemporary fictional work.  You can backtest that and others using the tracks in this blog and the download of the MOT.  Do that backtesting if for no other reason than to prove my work wrong.  You will find many errors owing to the fallibility of my editorial staff; I have none.  If you do the work, I'm confident you'll get the "hook" of which I spoke in the recent My Phiessay.

Proof.  "2+2=4."  Pretty simple.  "I witnessed that crime and will sign an affidavit."  A little less simple, depending on the credibility of the witness and nature of that person's agenda.  How about a preponderance of interrelated circumstance?  Melodramatically, it comes down to Marie's note:

The proof begins with the background established in the previous essay; 252 and 266.

252, John Dee's philosopher stone number, 252.  How is the number '252' proof?  Let's use Luo Clement (a pen name for WD Gann in my opinion) by applying his Pythagorean interpretation of letters as numbers to see if anything pops out.  Some believe that the numerical representation of letters may hold meaning, might confirm truths that otherwise might be discounted.  We have 56 missing letters  in the spelling of the 45 greatest earthquakes of the MOT period.  We have Mr. Gann's modus operandi; a method that indicates what is missing may be more important that what is seen.  We have Mr. errr Clement's table of letter values.  Let's assign values to letters:

When we extend the 56 missing letters by Pythagorean values, Luo Clement's values of letter vibration, you  have John Dee's philosopher stone number 252 (in yellow for lazy Noxious Ones).  I find page 252 of TTTTA memorable but not relevant.

266, St Malachy's (thought by many to be Nostradamus) prophecy of the last Pope.   In contrast, I find page 82 entirely relevant.  You don't see it above?  Page 82 is highlighted in blue above.  I don't even have to look it up to know what's on that great page but will reprise it:

"To those who understand numbers, '266' reveals some remarkable events that are to follow the election of the new Pope."  Remarkable events that will follow the election of Pope Francis which occurred March 21, 2013.  Two years ago, before the 6th and 7th Prophecies were discovered and before the MOT was developed I knew this paragraph was Mr. Gann's warning that "remarkable events"

45, the number of greatest earthquakes during the 168-year MOT period.  Could Mr. Gann have predicted that in 2016 I would research the all-time "greatest" earthquakes as they appear in Wikipedia in 2016 and would find exactly 45 as having occurred after June 22, 1848, the beginning of the MOT period?  That is the way it worked out.  And that's the number you see highlighted in red in the tabular insert above.

You will also see John Dee's number of 252 divided by 56 missing letters and you get 4.50000.  Elevating one decimal place get, again, that 45 highlighted in yellow.  Looking at the 18 unused letters and 38 used letters as a proportion of letter values you get 4.56 (82 / 18) and 4.47 (170 / 38).  Each is pretty darn close to 4.5 or 45 if you will.  I don't think it is mathematically possible, in these latter two calculations, to derive values closer to 4.5 or, again, 45 if you will.

45, the number that divides time and space (price) into equal parts, as I recall.

Is this random?  Take a breath.  It gets far far deeper. 

Parsing page 82.  Focus on that article cited on page 82 (insert above), referred to as appearing in the New York American dated January 29, 1932.  Close Mr. Gann.  You planted an article on that date discussing the Papacy.  And, in its last paragraphs, you planted those prophesies of St Malachy.  But you planted the article in your home town newspaper, The Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 10 years late:

And 82 gets still deeper.  How many pages were in the January 29, 1932 issue of The Brooklyn Daily Eagle.  The webpage says 81 pages but you can't have a newspaper with 81 pages.  Maybe a page is un-numbered... you can't have a piece of paper without two sides.  There must have been 82 pages.

I could say far far more about page 82 but you should read it... page 82 is Mr. Gann's 'Predictions 101' or 'Predictions for Dummies' page giving you WWII and the Great Depression.  Predictions in plain text that even the Noxious Ones need to dismiss as 'just luck' or otherwise lose sleep.

The Inca's.   This one isn't a number...its the heart of the prediction;  "Pumapuka Inc_ in volcano mud."  A society that declined, its greatest symbol of prosperity and spirituality, Pumapunku, precipitously and largely abandoned, destroyed.  Perhaps, 'volcano mud?' Millions of tons of ash settling on Pumpunka coalesced by rainwater.  Imagination.

Did Mr. Gann encode the word "Inca" in TTTTA?  Did he intentionally omit the "a" so we would look for a correctly spelled "Inca?"  Indeed he did, once and only once.  And he spelled the word with a capital "I" as is proper (in red highlight):

As per normal, I could write for hours on the above citation accompanying "Inca," spelled acrostically with a cap 'I.'  But I'll limit myself to three points.

First, the yellow highlighted narrative; "There will be political wars and revolutionary changes...."  Does that sound like the political rhetoric within each of America's parties?  Black lives matter.  Build the wall.   Was Mr. Gann talking of 1928 or of 2016?  

An early on contention while trying to understand the MOT was that events that occur on its right side is a repetition of those that occurred on the left.  On the right side of the MOT we are at the year 2016 and its counterpart on the left is 1848; the "Year of Revolution" in Europe.  As best I recall my research, there was open revolution in 55 European countries that year.  Karl Marx was the great active promoter of those revolutions, socialism and the worker's cause. In the 1848 U.S. there was massive territorial expansion with the treaty ending the Mexican War and a path to the Civil War.

In 2016 we see impending disintegration of the European Union.  In the U.S. we have the first openly admitted socialist major contender for the presidency of the U.S. espousing socialism, workers social justice, penalizing the upper class and, quite literally, "revolution." 

There are layers and layers of similarity between 1848 and 2016.  Was Mr. Gann speaking of 1928 on page 82 or 2016?  

Second point is the answer to the immediately foregoing riddle.  See the number 88 highlighted in blue?  Such two digit numbers are infrequently found encoded in TTTTA.  I find similar numbers 11, 77 and 88, each only once.  88 appears directly beside 1928.... 1928 plus 88 is 2016.

Third point is the meaningful narrative that is found in the first paragraph of page 82 and which is a continuation of the last paragraph of the preceding page:

Some believe these paragraphs foretell of calamities attendant dual eclipses, etc.  In the context of the theme of "Yellowstone - now" and the fate of Pumapunka under volcano mud, I can envision a different but severe period beginning in 1928 + 88 or 2016.  

Page 88.  The reflex to read the page of a suspiciously presented number, as 88 is presented on page 82, is always too great for me.  The whole of page 88 is meaningful what with an acrostic inverted word "map" and a telestic inverted word "God" but I'll forego the entire page for brevity and reproduce only the last paragraph and its continuation on page 89:

The last battle will be fought in the air.  In the context of the plain narrative of TTTTA, we expect that will be a military war.  In the context of "Yellowstone - now," I think otherwise.

And the continuation on page 89; TTTTA's earliest appearing date of May 9, 1927 plus page 89...  May 9, 2016.  And the date of Marie's note above, June 5, 1927 at 3 a.m. plus 89....

The final sentence highlighted in red; and all men would perish but for the Lord shortening the time.  Mr. Gann was confident such would be the case; the time would be shortened.

*******

To wrap up the Inca's message, a declining society whose greatest geographic symbol of attainment was the lost city of Pumapunku, its remaining structures largely "...hidden beneath the modern ground's surface."  An exhortation to action, "Quick, quick, jump."  

To wrap up the proof by coincidence of numbers and circumstance; some by Pythagorean extraction of values from letters, some from the interrelation of numbers, some by references to pages with meaningful text.  The circumstances presented above only make sense if you've sensed that feeling of underlying order and used your intuition to question the one's natural inclination towards randomness... much as Mr. Einstein recommended.   Much as you find in Marie's note, "According to your faith be it unto you."

I now have the "data, data, data, I must have data" that began the study of earthquakes in this series.  I have 45 observations of earthquakes since the beginning of the MOT to this day which I believe Mr. Gann intended to be found.  And, in so doing, 33 of those earthquakes were ones that had not occurred at May 9, 1927, the date of TTTTA's Foreword.  He predicted them.

My purpose from the third of this series was to continue trying to find the data that would allow the derivation of mathematic prediction;  WD Gann's method of math and science.  That was the "hook." Perhaps the "hook" was designed to lead to the message:

... and not to the data or the mathematics of time and space.

Above my pay grade.  All I can influence is doing and sharing the work.

Jim Ross

ENS 11: Examining the message

From ENS 10 in this series, the message is:

[5/4/16 note: The message above has one too many 'a' s in it.  The correction has been may in the subsequent essay "ENS 12:  Proving the message.  The missing 'a' is key to a further inquiry that led to additional insight.]

To understand the message, you need to recall some background information from previous essays and findings; in point, John Dee and the number 252 and the 266th Pope.  A quick reprise of those background subjects.

John Dee is the second most encoded name cited in WD Gann's "Map of Time" that is encoded in the structure of "The Tunnel Through the Air."  John Dee was a contemporary and friend of Lord Francis Bacon and in the time period of Galileo and other great thinkers of that era.  Dee was reputed as among the most learned men of that era having in his personal library 4000 "volumes" at a time when the great Cambridge Oxford library had 400.  A magician, mathematician, alchemist, spiritualist, he was the philosopher scientist of Queen Elizabeth I's court.  His personal relationship with QE I was such that his personal written notes to her were encoded and then signed with their mutually understood signature "007."  John Dee was the first "007."  

"Dee" appears in TTTTA 45 times....make that 46 times.  Literally, there are 45 instances of "Dee."  There is one instance of "007."  It is the 23rd item if the now 46 items are arranged in line sequence as you find it HERE.  That 7592nd line on which "007" is pictured HERE.  Recall, permutations of "WD Gann" are encoded in TTTTA some 23 times and as a ratio of the number of the 37 times a permutation of my name appears in TTTTA (37 times), we have Phi.  The essay on deriving Phi from 37 and 23 is "My Phi."  

Hmmm, 46 observations of "Dee" and every one of them are telestic.  Is that random? No.  "007" is the 23rd observation.  Is that coincidence?  No.

What's so important about John Dee?  Its his philosophers stone number 252, suspiciously 1/10th of the Biblical Great Week of 2520 years.  252 is enshrined in Dee's "Monas Heiroglyphica"...it is is important to Mr. Gann, in my humble opinion.   As a proportion to WD Gann's philosopher stone number, 432, the number pages in TTTTA when counting blank title and rear pages, you have the same proportion as 12 to 7, e.g. 432 to 252 reduces to 12 to 7.  Remember 252.

266th Pope, this is where my journey into TTTTA truly started.  St Malachy's  (some say Nostradamus in pen name of the already departed Saint), prophecy that the 266th Pope would be the last Pope of the Catholic Church...and perhaps the last period.  Pope Francis is the 266th Pope by near consensus counts of all Popes under the prophecy.  Pope Francis was elected to the office on March 13, 2013.

On page 82 of TTTTA we find the 266th Pope and Mr. Gann indicates "remarkable events" will occur in the wake of the election of the 266th Pope.  It is my contention that pages 82, 83 and 84 overview those events.  Remember the number 82.  

That's the background.  Now for the important points of the message; how it was derived, its content and context, its meaning as I interpret it and how we might logically, even mathematically, prove the meaning as proposed was Mr. Gann's intended meaning.

First, how did I derive their message?  I sorted the 56 missing letters from the results of the 'objective' study of the 45 greatest earthquakes in the MOT period and then arranged them horizontally.  As I derived a word, I subtracted one letter from the horizontal line of letters.  The result of the exercise is below:

Are there alternate words to be found in 56 letters?  Absolutely.  Are there a set of so constructed alternate words that create a message consistent with the themes of methods that derived the 56 letters, that is, Yellowstone and 45 earthquakes?  I can't think of an alternate message but I go with the flow.  IF I was meant to find something then I'd think the first thing I found is the correct result.

56 missing letters of which 38 letters are used to spell the message that begins this essay.

Second, what is the content and context of the message?  This is pretty simple.  The content of the message is an advanced society, the Incan Empire, symbolized by the mysteries of the Pumapunka square stones (one as large as 65 metric tons), disappears precipitously.  Astroarchaeological study first thought the society existed 14,000 years ago to be corrected to a far more recent dating.  Not remotely fully excavated, ground sonar indicates buildings, pools, and other structures buried below layers of earth.  Perhaps volcanic mud?  Volcanic ash coalescing on Pumapunka perhaps?  Check the map; volcanos in South America border the Andean Mountains 200 miles or so west of Pumapunka.  

Recall the misspelled "greaty City of Chicago" on page 320.  Is it the "great City of Chicago" or the "grey City of Chicago?  Yellowstone some 1300 miles west of Chicago.  What a silly typo for a typesetter to make, a publisher to miss and a detailed author to.... allow.  I don't think so but that's me.

In context, the message must relate to the genesis of this series "Yellowstone - now" and 45 earthquakes from which the message is derived.  I doubt that I need to elaborate further.  Even for the Noxious Ones.

Third, what is the meaning of the message?  Obviously, great societies die and disappear.  Sometimes precipitously and with only mere traces of their prior existence.  Consider Mr. Gann's description of Atlantis on that wondrous page 76 of the chapter 7, "Future Cycles:"

Focus on "There is considerable truth in that statement."  Mr. Gann, point blank, is telling us he approves of the thought that there was a great civilization which was substantially as advanced as that  which is achieved at least as it was in 1927.  It's as if, he has "seen" or proven, perhaps mathematically, that such an advanced society existed.  Think about it "There is considerable truth in that statement."  Did he know?  Why else did he phrase it that way?  Was he that careless?

If you read the next paragraph of page 76 we have the circle; that everything is elliptical by nature.  It has a beginning and an end and the end marks a new beginning.  That people, and we'd expect, societies, do good and evil and every such act comes back as an opposite.  A bad deed results, ultimately, in a bad result and the reverse.  There is always "atonement," whether you believe its result is personal or the Christian result of "atonement" and "grace."  Consequence, cause and effect.  

The meaning of the message is all too clear, at least to me.  Its rather personal and I've laid out my take.  Its something worthy of one's own personal consideration.  What you believe, you own so please don't try to refute my thought and steal what I own.  Just consider and create your own property and wealth. 

I don't know how proximate the "now" is or what's to be done....the "quick, quick, jump."  Isn't that the way it always is in trading?  And perhaps, in life?  We know the pyramiding price grows irrationally high and must crash...we just don't know the "when."  We know the beginning of the "path:" a panic resulting from an event, be it the LTCM default, the Lehman crisis or...the 1906 San Francisco earthquake.  We don't know the 'when.'  Maybe the 'when' is in TTTTA but I don't know it.

Fourth, can Mr. Gann's intent to leave this message be proven? After all, I've personally interpreted it and, no doubt, tainted it with my bias?  Did Mr. Gann leave a web of citations, interrelated based upon numbers, that would, by their interrelationships and consistency of message, cause one to believe the message was intended?

*******

Too much too fast to present and have a reader pause consider.  Its too easy for me to write these thoughts because I've lived them the past several days, and, more largely, the last two years since I wrote the essay on the "remarkable events" that would occur upon the election of the 266th Pope.

The perceived proof will have to wait another day first because I have not written that which I've conceived by not set to print and second because the propositions (above) needs to be considered.  

On a personal note I exchanged thoughts with another today and need to reflect on the "Noxious Ones."  I've insulted some readers out of reflex to their lack of imagination and prideful positions that theirs was the greater knowledge.  That was me two years ago; not that I am any better than I was back then.  Rather, I'm "less worse."  Socrates, in the "Apology," knew he was smarter than the great philosophers, artists, mathematicians... because they all presented themselves as having the knowledge that only God could have.  Socrates knew he was smarter than them because he knew that he did not know those things only God could know.  He knew he didn't know.

If there's anything I've proven over the last two years of studying WD Gann, its how little I do know.  Even the "Noxious Ones," such as myself, can open their minds, read the "signs" and make their own judgements.  Judge by the fruit.  Create your own wealth.

Hold on to those two numbers; John Dee's philosopher's stone number 252 and the 266th Pope.

Jim Ross

ENS 10: The Yellowstone method applied and the message

The "ENS" series began with the Yellowstone essays (2) in which four incidences of "Yellowstone" encoded in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" using acrostic and telestic letters, not in ordered form, but in scrambled and proximate letters:

Four observations but, arguably, unconvincing because 1) they aren't ordered letters and 2) 5 letters were missing.  The Noxious Ones ("NO's") must have plainly written messages like "See Spot run" which they consider incontrovertible.  I think Gurdjieffe and Mr. Gann would respond, mathematics "...is the only real science that the entire civilized world has agreed upon."  So much for the "plainly written words."  Imprecise, subjective words taken as if they are truth.

Which leaves in contention the 5 (w, o, n, o, and n) missing letters in Yellowstone, only 3 of which are unique (w, o and n).  They spell "won" or "own" or "now."  Presuming Mr. Gann was spelling a message out of the missing letters, which of the 3 words might be relevant in the context of Yellowstone?  "Now."  He meant Yellowstone-now.  Not another 100,000 years from now.

Likely more important than the message is the method because the method yields further messages.   The method; what is missing might be more important than what is present.  Why give your most precious secrets to the NO's who are unwilling to work to find...ask, seek and knock.  They'd prefer to read someone's work assuming they'd derive knowledge and understanding without the effort.  How many books on markets and methods have I purchased, studied and tried to implement only to find modest results infrequently and inconsistency always?  There's a little of the NO laziness in all of us.

The method, finding that which is prominently missing, is a learning device Philo of Alexandria taught in times near the time when several of the Bible's books were written.  Broaden that method by comparing the observations to their related citation in TTTTA, finding the differences and seeing if the details, together, have meaning.  Perhaps you need to be a sleuth with the obsessive need for details, for data, of whom Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote, in fiction, of course:

So much in one paragraph, set off by meaningful chapter line counts.  Emerson's "Compensation" is incredible.  [Surely Lady Beresford has a meaningful anagram but it escapes me.]

A perceived message, "now," and a similarly simple method; find what's missing.  The connection between earthquakes and the telestic message ("ens" and its inversion "sne") was found in Tokyo J1.  The Japanese radio station J1 sports a web page for the nations "earthquake notification service" or "ens."  The USGS, here in the US, has its own "ENS:"

NO's; please tell me the 21 observations of the encoded telestic word, "ens" and 19 observations of its inversion "sne" are random.  Let's consider that objection.  All 40 observations are contiguous, ordered letters the first of which found in TTTTA is provided as an example (pg 20):

NO's take notice; the 's' follows the 'n' and the 'e' follows the 'n'.....contiguous, order.  Not simply proximate unordered letters like in Yellowstone but ordered letters and either acrostic or telestic but not a mixture of the two.  40 observations.

The NO's tell us, "only 40 observations in over 15,000 lines of text, why, that could be random."  Of course, they don't know if it could be random or not, but we don't either do we?  Maybe a statistician could assess the possibilities but I can't.  

Or maybe we do know.  The three letters e, n and s are popular.  We'd expect the 40 observations to be both acrostic and telestic.  Ideally, 20 acrostic and 20 telestic observations of "ens" and "sne."

Nope.  There are 40 telestic words "ens" or "sne."  There aren't any acrostic words "ens" or "sne;" not one.  I've done that search with the "finder" feature of the MOT download many many times.  40 observations of those 3 ordered letters...every one is entirely telestic.

Is that random?  Of course not.

Armed with this great contradiction of randomness, what's the purpose?  We have Yellowstone, earthquakes, "now," 40 observations of "ens" and its counterpart and 45 historic earthquakes summarized in the immediately preceding essays of this series......   and a method.   

As a statistician 'wannabe' my knee jerk reaction was to try to correlate the 40 observations with the 45 real earthquake events.  Well, that's kinda tough because you need a like number independent variable observations and dependent variable observations.  It is not what I wanted to find.  A couple essays ago I said that 40 observations and 40 quakes would be the ideal.  I expected it and was wrong.  No correlation possible; but I sense the last chapter on this is not written.

Disappointed, I researched the 45 greatest earthquakes in the current MOT period as identified from Wikipedia (see previous ENS series essays).  I identified the date of each earthquake and searched the surrounding acrostic and telestic letters to see if the name of the quake could be spelled.  The first (2010 Haiti) observation was spelled perfectly in all caps in a space closely proximate to the date of the earthquake.  I was hooked.  The last (1995 Great Hanshin) observation was spelled with one letter missing; acceptable.  But the 43 observation in between, not so much.  The NO in me wanted to see the perfectly spelled word, one letter perfectly after the other such as "1960 Valdivia" earthquake.  That would make it simple, no work, no wrestling with what did Mr. Gann intended to predict?  The date of the earthquake in 1960 and the name of the earthquake.  That would be incontrovertible evidence that in 1927 he predicted the strongest earthquake in the last 168 years; that would not occur for 33 years after the prediction.  But it was not so.

So what was it?  I now know, but only after having performed the exercise no less than 4 complete times.  Take each of the 45 earthquakes, find the date on the MOT and then find and highlight each letter spelling the name.  

The first time, I wanted to see how compactly I could spell the name of the quake.  I changed the name of the quake to help me do that.  Cheating.  I didn't have any standard for how many lines away from the date line I'd search before I decided the observation wasn't properly spelled.  It was subjective.  There were nice geometric patterns exhibited by some observations, there were incredible imbalances for many observations; all letters were acrostic and none telestic for example.  Clear non randomness, clear intent to highlight that date.  But its all subjective.

So I resolved the ultimate test had to have an objective standard.  I'd use the Wikipedia name for the earthquake; no cheating.  And I'd search letters surrounding the date not higher than 19 lines above the date and 19 lines below the date.  Then I would summarize the missing letters to see if "what was missing" provided a meaningful message.  

And it did.

Before explaining the message in the next essay...and proving it with Luo Clement's assignments of values to letters.... here are the results of the 45 observations:

One last time to make the procedure clear.  I found the date of the earthquake on the MOT, highlighted in light green.  Then I spaced upwards 19 lines and downward 19 lines and drew a black box around those 39 lines (19 X 2 plus the date line).  Then I searched for every letter of the name of each earthquake (the exact name as it appeared in Wikipedia's three tables of "deadliest," "most destructive" and "strongest" earthquakes found HERE) and highlighted every letter that I found.  And finally I placed in the "19X19 Missing" column the letters that were missing.  Finally, on the far right is a link to a screen shot for each observation which you can use back test my work.

There were 56 missing letters of which 40 letters are used to spell an understandable and relevant message:

Pumapunka Inca in volcano mud.  Quick, quick, jump.

Might a lost temple and civilization and a volcano have some meaning in the context of our times; in the context of the 266th Pope, elected in our time?

I'll not explain the message' meaning in this lengthy essay.  Thanks to a commenter, I understand the meaning of Pumapunka.  Oh, I'd briefly studied the mysteries of the Pumapunka some time ago but I'd have never made the connection without that heads up.  I'll let you study the message so when I do my best to explain the rationality within it and the relevance to the ENS series experiment and to our times, you'll understand what (in my opinion) Mr. Gann was telling us.

There is not only a message in verbal meaning to this message, there is mathematic evidence of its intention.  And once the whole of this incredible mystery is understood, the reader should have unmistakeable evidence that Mr. Gann predicted the 33 of 45 (12 before, 33 after or 45 in total) earthquakes that occurred after the date of the Foreword "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

Jim Ross

April 30, 2016

No, Jim, it is May 1, 2016.  Well, not exactly.  During one of my exercises/experiments in a very long day yesterday, I'd isolated the missing letters derived from spelling 45 of the great earthquakes from the acrostic and telestic letters nearest the date of their occurrence in the "Map of Time" found in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  There were 72 missing letters in that iteration of the experiment.  And then I got the idea to assign a Luo Clement (Pythagorean) value to each of the 72 letters and they added to 354.

72 or 1/5th of the circle; the pentagonal time division about which Bradley Cowan wrote a book.  354, the number of days in the Hebrew lunar calendar.  I discarded that particular iteration of the 'experiment' because it contained some subjective elements. It came back to haunt me this morning at about 3am, somewhere between sleep and awake.

So I woke up thinking about April 30, 2016.  Background; flash back to January 28, 2015, I'd confirmed my name was intentionally placed in TTTTA in 1927 by finding my street address in TTTTA.  Why was January 28 important.  WD Gann predicted the date I'd make that discovery.  From page 75 of TTTTA:

January 28, 1927 plus 88 years and you have the exact date I found my street address encoded in TTTTA along with a Pythagorean right triangle emblazened in its letter and line arrangement.  That is the "7th Prophecy."

This last week I identified a second very prominent date associated with my name (spelled not once but twice in red below) and it was April 30:

As I laid there, I wondered, as I had last week anticipated that date, April 30... I wondered if anything I did yesterday, April 30, reached the level of discovery that occurred January 28, 2015.  [Actually, I had found something that will be discussed in a later essay in the "ENS" series.]

What was startling about yesterday?  Nothing reached the January 28 level, until I started thinking about the nature of the MOT this morning.  Then, there it was.  The MOT is not the 2-dimensional concept it appears to be on paper.  It is not the angular 3-dimensional, simple symmetric "V;" no, it is the curvilinear "conical helix" conceived and briefly commented upon by Bradley Cowan in "Four Dimensional Stock Market Structures and Cycles" page 34.

On the left, the curvilinear conical helix conceived by physicist and as portrayed by Wolfram.  On the right is the "Map of Time" as I pictured its 84 years of descending dates from 1848, reaching a bottom apex at 1932 and then ascending to 2016.

The problem with the MOT is its linear, two dimensional depiction.  Space-time is not linear as the chart on the right alludes.  Contrary to my initial impression that what happens on the left side of the MOT happens on the same line on the right side of the MOT, it doesn't.  But it comes close.  As the great physicist said, "it rhymes."  It is not linear.

On the right left of the MOT we find 9/11 on line 2699 (yellow highlight below).  9/11 might be characterized as a surprise aviation terrorist attack by an enemy that had, years before, declared war on the United States.  On the left side of the MOT we find Colonel Benjamin Grierson's 1863 cavalry raids (red highlight) designed to focus Confederate attention away from the turning point battles of Vicksburg and the staging of Gettysburg.

The two events are not on the same line...but they "rhyme."  They're close.  [For your convenience and to illustrate, I have marked the MOT in the third insert with the years 1863 (Grierson), 2001 (9/11), 1919 (Treaty of Versailles) and 1945 (average surrender of Germany and Japan).] 

The terror attacks of 9/11 are the historical repetition of Grierson's raids at so many levels of meaning and circumstance which are recounted in the many essays in this blog.  

Grierson's raids and 9/11 are not on the same line because the MOT is not linear.  It is curvilinear as is the conical helix.  Each of the 42 sections or cycles within the MOT are curved upwards.  No, there are not 36 chapter divisions of TTTTA but 42 sections as proven by the intentionally miss-numbered Chapter 39 "Robert Gordon's Seven Days."  42 cycles, each with 360 degrees but very different numbers of days.  42 cycles that climb the conical helix of the MOT.

The same comparison as Grierson and 9/11 can be made with the Treaty of Versailles ending WWI and the separate surrenders of Germany and Japan ending WWII.  Take the average of the later two dates and compare it to the date of the Treaty of Versailles.  The MOT will find the date of the Treaty of Versailles only a few lines below the average of the end dates of WWII.  Try it.  I did.  Look at where the years 1919 and 1945 appear in the third insert.

There are too many implications of the finding that the MOT is a conical helix.  That's not what I intended to present here.  Not even close.

*******

If this conical helix finding proves to be as important as I presently believe, it is the link between having a device that generally implies history repeating to one that predicts exactly.  Its a big deal born entirely of analytical thought.  It is not a result of correlation.  Correlation will prove the "natural law" if it is present.  It will not identify that law.

This last week I noticed five or so dates associated with my name encoded in TTTTA and mused "might something happen on that day?"  I was appropriately reminded by a commenter that I needed to prove the dates of predictions by correlating data with my model of the future before making predictions.  Point taken well given my "great mistake."  In my defense, I had not made a prediction, only expressing my wonder if anything of note would happen.  More-so than inferring a great seismic event for April 30 (one of the dates), I was wondering if some personal break through might occur in my research on April 30.

And it did or I believe it has.  The conical helix interpretation of the MOT I expect, without any more than personal belief, will become very important when proven by data.

"But" you say, "you perceived these things half asleep, half awake on May 1."  Depends on your calendar.  Refer back to first two paragraphs of this essay; the Hebrew lunar calendar.  The Hebrew calendar day begins with sunset.  What I discovered (pending proof) this morning occurred, hmmm, April 30 if that day, so named, is counted as beginning at the sunset preceding that moment.

In my personal belief, and that's the only thing that counts, WD Gann predicted I would make this discovery on the day when it occurred.

Jim Ross 

ENS 9: Results of the "Best Fit" experiment

In previous essays of this series, I've been struggling with identifying a likely list of the "greatest" earthquakes of the WD Gann "Map of Time" period; June 22, 1848 to June 21, 2016.  And then, each identified earthquake date was found in the MOT and evaluated to determine if Mr. Gann left any  indications that he had predicted their occurrence (for those that occurred after the date of the publication of "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  Here is a table of the results of the "Best Fit" method that I, haphazardly and subjectively, developed to identify the earthquakes and find any indications:

[There are screenshot links that I appended at the right of each observation to which you can refer to and re test each observation.   If you want to derive the above 45 earthquakes since June 22, 1848, there are three lists of "Deadliest," "Most Destrustive" and "Strongest" earthquakes at Wikipedia;  simply combine the lists, eliminate pre June 22, 1848 earthquakes and eliminate duplications.]

I call the above a "Best Fit" because the method is to find the date of each earthquake and then to try and spell the word that best typifies the nature of that earthquake.  For example, for the 2010 Haiti earthquake (red highlight), I wanted to find the word "Haiti" spelled very near its date located in the MOT, January 12, 2010:

Lo and behold, I found "HAITI" spelled in all capital letters (there are 2 i's, a cap on line 1191 and a lower case on 1192), in all acrostic letters and they span 16 lines above the date line, 1177, and 16 lines below the date line (the lower cap 'i').  Every letter of the word located proximate to the exact date of the earthquake (1/12/2010 highlighted in green) and beginning and ending 16 lines above the date and 16 lines below.

Notice the uppermost top left "H," the date and the lowermost "i" creates an isosceles triangle.

Is that random?  I submit Mr. Gann predicted the 2010 Haiti earthquake.

The cornerstone.  I call the 2010 Haiti earthquake a Harbinger, the hook, the 'cornerstone.'  It was the first of the 45 'greatest' earthquake observations located in TTTTA.  It was the 'hook' that made me research more of the observations.  Mr. Gann's modus operandi.

If the first observation was a statement, the next 43 were a wasteland.  Not really.  When the first observation is so dramatic the next many are, well, a let down.  The Noxious Ones would want us to
believe the only way they would accept that Mr. Gann predicted these 45 earthquakes would be an appendix page that is headed "I, WD Gann, predicted the following 45 earthquakes, 32 of which will occur after the publication of this book.  Anything less that this is, simply, not acceptable to the Noxious Ones.  Of course, there isn't an appendix.  Mr. Gann did not believe in giving anything to anyone without their effort.  So he encoded the 45 earthquake observations.

The cap stone.  In a previous essay on Mr. Gann's modus operandi I identified a cornerstone, cap stone and the great flourish; a key stone which firms the entire structure presented.  The cap stone, we know from Luo Clement (whom, in several essays, I've alleged was a pen name of WD Gann) is the last item of a series.  Which brings me to question, how do we know what's last?

Moreover, how many of the greatest earthquakes are truly "great."  In previous essays of this series, three criteria of "greatness," all appearing with convenient lists in Wikipedia, were presumed; deadliest (greatest fatalities), most destructive (a dollar evaluation) and most severe (moment of magnitude seismic measurement).  Initially, 43 observations were located.  Later, the 1960 Valdivia earthquake was found to have been omitted.  It was on the Wikipedia list but was first thought to have been a duplication of one of the most deadly earthquakes in the MOT period.

The addition of 1960 Valdivia made 44 identified earthquakes; an awkward number.  So, as any good accountant would do, I "reconciled" the initial Wikipedia lists of earthquakes to the 44 thus identified.  The three lists were combined, sorted by date, duplicates were eliminated and there were 45 earthquakes remaining.

The 45th earthquakes is in blue in the first inserted table above; the 1995 Great Hanshin or Kobe earthquake and tsunami.  As I'd already evaluated the first 44 observations I had yet to evaluate this one.  And it was dramatic:

Not only can you spell Kobe in all acrostic letters, but it forms a right triangle when the date is considered a corner; looks rather Pythagorean?  That's what I saw, no modification, no photo shop.  That's what you will see if you download the MOT and do it yourself.  Was I surprised when I saw Mr. Gann showing off by spelling "Kobe" as second time in the telestics?  Hardly.  And, all letters, both words were at or above the date line.  Every letter.

About that right triangle.  The vertical distance is 23 lines and the horizontal distance is 40 characters (not including punctuation and spaces).  A right triangle comprised of side lengths of 23 and 39 and and angle of 90* gives you a hypotenuse length of 31.496  How many of the 45 observations occurred after the date of the Foreword of TTTTA and were, therefore, predictions of future earthquakes?  32.  Play around with the parameters (24 or 23, 45 or 44), but its close.

And an area of the triangle close to the number of days in the solar year.  

The first of 45 observations tested "HAITI" yielded an isosceles triangle and the last observation yields the above right triangle.  Notably, the distances of travel in "Robert Gordon's Seven Days" yielded an isosceles triangle when measured from the latitude of NYC and a right triangle when measured from the equator.

Is that random?  I submit Mr. Gann predicted the 1995 Great Hanshin or Kobe earthquake.  Its the dramatic cap stone; it tells me everything in between, however weak the evidence of intent to identify each earthquake, was identified.  But that's me.

The key stone.  As identified in the "modus operandi" essay, we expect an indication, a key stone, that further pulls together every observation.

In the first two essays of this series (HERE and HERE), four findings of the word "Yellowstone" that were spelled with unordered but proximate letters.  The missing letters were critical; o w o n.  Four letters, three of which are unique and spell 'won,' ' own' or 'now.'  Yellowstone and now.  But that's not the point.  As in modus operandi, a final flourish that, itself strongly indicates the exercise was not frivolous.  No, Noxious Ones, Mr. Gann didn't state it in plain English.  He stated it in a key stone.

Might the key stone to this exercise be the missing letters?  When you evaluate the missing letters in that first table above under the heading "missing" you find that 28 earthquakes were not spelled perfectly.  There are 37 letters missing (interesting number to pop up as discussed in modus operandi but I digress):

Those 37 letters can be used to spell two iterations of 'quick,' one of which is entirely in caps.  Enticing but unproven, as yet, are the tempting words, 'volcano' and 'quake.'

In the context of the this series of essays, namely "Yellowstone," we find twice spelled and augmenting the message "now" found in the Yellowstone exercises....we find 'QUICK' and 'quick.'  

Is Mr. Gann expressing a message of urgency meant for our times; the age of the 266th Pope in which we are to expect "remarkable events?"

*******

I don't like the "Best Fit" method that I groped to find.  Originally I thought the proximity of letters would prove the intent of every one of the 45 observations.  I felt like Mr. Gann would spell, perfectly, the key word of every observation with the letters indisputably close to the date of the earthquake.  That goes to show there's some of the Noxious One's in all of us.  It isn't that easy.  If we want to know, we must be expected to work to get Mr. Gann's hidden knowledge (presuming it's there).

I found myself expanding the "matrix" of lines that would be used to spell the target earthquake name.  Too many observations required subjective manipulation for this former "Big 8," "Big 6," Big 4"auditor's liking.  I want objectivity.  I want objective proof that Mr. Gann identified 45 earthquakes in TTTTA, 32 of which were predictions of future events.  

[Hmmm, 45 observations, half the angle of the right triangle.  The angle that Mr. Gann said "divides time and space into equal parts.  45 divided by 32 is 1.40625, suspiciously close to the hypotenuse of the 1X1 square.  Makes me wonder.  But that's me.]

So, a new and "less worse" method to come; far less subjective.  I've implemented it and, unlike how this series has emerged thus far, I know the method and results.  In my opinion, the results are compelling.  I will write the essay this weekend.

As always, do the work and make up your own mind.  Learning as I'm learning, isn't in just the reading.  Its the doing.

Jim Ross

Mr. Gann's encoding modus operandi; "My Phi"

I've avoided writing this essay for well over a year.  I worried about the many Noxious Ones whose self importance will force them to protest the finding; social media fear.  But now is the time it is important.  It is important because it reveals some aspects of WD Gann's modus operandi in encoding various information in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

My name or initials is encoded in TTTTA 37 times in various permutations.  WD Gann's name or initials are encoded in TTTTA as well, 23 times.  I've spent tens of hours searching by every imaginable (at least in my wild imagination) combination of contiguous acrostic and telestic letters that might spell either names or initials of either of the two names.  The results, including the "Map of Time" line number and a screen shot link, are in the following table:

Test the above; you have access to the WD Gann "Map of Time" so you can either go to the line number noted in the above and recreate the initials or name or you can view the associated screenshot of the MOT for each observation.

Modus operandi aspect 1; the cornerstone.  When introducing a series of important data, begin the data with a highly recognizable encoded word.  If WD Gann wanted to catch the attention of a person intended, destined, or whatever, to discover his encodings, the he would put an easily found word early in the book.  Early on he'd catch the attention of the intended; hook him.  Hook me:

That was the first citation of the 37 occurrences of my name in TTTTA I found.  I was not looking for it.  It happens to be the clearest and is unmistakable.  Many later citations are less clear.  Some are as or, arguable, more clear.  Taken together, they are very very persuasive that I was 'seen.'  Very narcissistic of me the Noxious Ones will say.  Aristotle would say, when you can't refute call the opponent a name.  No, its simply a fact that the Noxious Ones will not admit as it reduces their self importance or 'destination' will disagree with their Gaussian view of the random world.

The first observation above, is the 'hook' that set me off on the "7th Prophecy of WD Gann."

Modus operandi aspect 1, then, is put a dramatic example up front.

Modus operandi aspect 2.  Place as much important information contiguous with or in mathematic relation to each item in the series as possible.  The 10th and 11th items above are an example:

Obvious to anyone who has studied TTTTA is Chapter VII "Future Cycles."  And equally obvious is a personal message delivered to the named recipient, me; am I the "ens" (yellow highlight) or the "earthquake notification service?"  Whether reality or delusion, it sure seems that way.

But that's not all.  Focus on "January 28, 1927" below "Future Cycles."  As documented in the 7th Prophecy, I had doubts about whether the then many instances of my name I'd found were "intended."  How would Mr. Gann convince me?  And, during a second viewing of "The Imitation Game" (the discovery of the code and mechanics of the WWII German counterpart of WD Gann's "pocket radio"), I knew how Mr. Gann would prove the intention of the encodings; he'd spell my street address.  I discovered my street name "Tottenham" on January 28, 2015 encoded in TTTTA amid an exquisitely constructed isosceles triangle.

Look at the other dates below January 28 on the first insert above; April 30, June 19 and July 16.  Something important happened January 28; I became convinced my name was intended.  Will something important happen on those latter 3 dates?  

One more date.  There aren't any dates associated with Mr. Gann's 23 observations.  But there is one in the text narrative; the date of the Foreword.  It is dated May 9, 1927, adjacent "W.D. Mann."

Will something happen one of those four dates, April 30, May 9, June 19 or July 16?  Or all?

If I were Mr. Gann and I wanted to really show off, well, maybe:

....born in 1951, I was 16 years old in January 1968; a "teen."  [See the beige highlights.]

Modus operandi aspect 2, then is, to the best extent possible, associate important information with encoded messages.  And sometimes, unimportant information.

Modus operandi aspect 3; the keystone.  Though this is the third of three aspects, I call this the 'keystone.'  Without this final flourish of design, the weaker observations in an encoded series might enable the Noxious Ones to credibly, in their minds, refute the encodings.  The keystone uses all of the data of the observations to verify themselves as a whole and, therefore, individually.

There are 37 independent observations of my name, no more no less (that I can find after extensive searches) .  The number '37' is revered by Masons, Rosicrucians and I'd expect their predecessors back to Pythagoras...at least.  '37' is the smallest angle of the Pythagorean 3-4-5 right triangle.  There is far more gravitas that we might associate with the number but I sense most have heard that lore.  

There are 23 independent observations of Mr. Gann's name or initials.  Again, a mystical number.  In the context of my inquiry, the WD Gann Memorial Triangle has the three sides of that triangle denominated in years as multiples of 23.  There are 23 years between the Time Square attack on the "Mammouth Building" in 1932 and Mr. Gann's gravestone date (date of internment) in 1955.  There are 46 years between the date the Statue of Liberty was dedicated and the 1932 "Mammouth Building" attack (23 X 2).  And there are 69 years between the dedication of the Statue of Liberty and Mr. Gann's grave stone date (23 X 3).  

The number 23 also conjures up the "23 enigma."  A person enthralled with the mystic meaning of this great prime number may become deluded of his/her imaginings.  I take that very personally; with constant introspection....what the heck am I doing here?

37 and 23.  Here's the "grand flourish," the keystone as the mysterious Luo Clement might style it:

I call that calculation"My Phi."  One of many citations of Phi I have found encoded in TTTTA.  Some as simple as two numbers in the plain narrative, some as complex as the telestic word and name of Leonardo "de Pisa" (one of several names for Fibonacci).  One as blunt as "Phi."  Duh.  Milk for the weak, meat for the strong.

A story told before.  Yet another Noxious One, trying to sell me a course which could teach me astrology...even me, as dumb as I am... tells me; "Mr. Gann was very selfish.  He never taught his secret knowledge of Phi."  No, the problem was the Noxious One was too inflexible, too bigoted, too self absorbed to "ask, seek and knock."  In the absence of knowledge he elevated himself by claiming something of which he knew nothing.  Milk for the weak, meat for the strong.

Modus operandi aspect 3 is a device that confirms the entirety of the data.  Those who would impeach the weakest of the encoded data points must also dispute this last proof of their entirety.  Failing that, the weaker observations are elevated in their meaning; "a small one becomes a large one."

*******

Go ahead and pick it apart.  There are a lot of moving parts and I make mistakes.  There are weak observations and strong observations but they're a package deal.  In a few cases we can parse whether an observation is valid, whether it is two observations rather than one, whether two observations are actually a single observation.  I won't participate the hell of details the Noxious Ones must now create.  Go to that very first observation screen shot in this essay.  Say it isn't so.  

As well, the particularly ignorant Noxious One, with self gratification, will declare "you can assemble any word you want with all an infinite population of letters."  Actually one such Noxious One said exactly that about the "6's" that appear in the first paragraph of TTTTA.   No, Mr. Noxious One (initial's "NO"), there are a finite number of acrostic letters and of telestic letters in TTTTA.  And spelling an encoded word requires some rules; in this essay, only contiguous acrostic or telestic letters are allowed to form the 37 and 23 messages.  

Or the Noxious One might say "Well, I can find my name in TTTTA acrostic or telestic letters."  There are people other than myself and Mr. Gann whose names do appear in TTTTA; I've seen it and  sense they have a part in this unfolding miracle.  So I say, "Knock yourself out."  You have access to the MOT download.  The rules are contiguous acrostic and telestic letters.  If, under those rules, you find your name in TTTTA many times, then you might consider the improbability.  You might consider whether you should be disputing this effort with valueless diatribe or furthering the uncovering of knowledge that Mr. Gann left us all.  Maybe you'll get the "hook." 

When, ultimately, I am able to conclude several now pending series of essays, they may well depend on these aspects of Mr. Gann's encoding modus operandi to prove their intent.

Jim Ross  

ENS 8: The third and final set of historic earthquake data points

Back to data generation.

The "plan" is to identify the most notable earthquakes by the various criteria by which earthquakes are ranking; deadliest, most destructive (costliest) and most powerful.  Then, by identifying the dates of those earthquakes in the MOT, the surrounding acrostic and telestic letters can be scanned to see if they spell the name of the earthquake, there is significance of the missing letters and if there is a geometric configuration of the letters.  The question that must be asked with each observation is whether there is indication that Mr. Gann identified that earthquake.  For those after the date of TTTTA's publication...did he foresee its future occurrence?

And then, how do the observations relate to 21 observations of the telestic message, "ens," and 19 observation of its inverse, "sne," correlate with the physical results?

In previous essays of this service there have been identified the 15 deadliest earthquakes in the period covered by WD Gann "Map of Time."  In addition, the 12 most destructive earthquakes of the MOT period were identified.  Lacking is the most powerful earthquakes of the MOT which will be documented in this essay.

As in previous essays a list from Wikipedia was used to identify the most powerful earthquakes:

Of that list of 39 earthquakes, 16 (far right column) were identified that occurred after June 21, 1848 (beginning of the MOT) and that had not been included in the lists of deadliest and most destructive earthquakes.  The 16 earthquake observations and the results are in the following table:

Screen shots of the letters located near each of the 16 dates, including comments on apparent geometry of the letter arrangements and other notable observations are found at the following links:

http://screencast.com/t/YagtiC5hs

http://screencast.com/t/xR3UoksIgwSi

http://screencast.com/t/VSpUmkoa5Zc

http://screencast.com/t/iwqPXKi8

http://screencast.com/t/uwsWsQBjv0e

http://screencast.com/t/SwKbi3sU5g

http://screencast.com/t/ajlzdSJvNtkG

http://screencast.com/t/SAKixhU62

http://screencast.com/t/Ii3ByLDs

http://screencast.com/t/xyz6EGC2

http://screencast.com/t/ujyqvaFa

http://screencast.com/t/XwpXm8jTn

http://screencast.com/t/MsCFJLxv8Ig

http://screencast.com/t/r1jWlzwPRRhf

http://screencast.com/t/lKZtmcX1kJdx

http://screencast.com/t/z7jpe8DA9

I'll reserve an evaluation of the uniqueness of each observation which might infer its intentional design by Mr. Gann.  As I was creating the above screenshots, I was dubious.  Simply finding the letters isn't, itself, persuasive.  But the whole "ball of wax" is the basis on which one might make a judgement.  

There were unique, clearly intentionally designed spellings that indicated Mr. Gann was predicting a future earthquake.  For example, in the previous essay on this subject found HERE I highlight one of the most conclusive displays of encoding Mr. Gann's intention; Haiti.  It was the first observation I evaluated (even though it is shown as number 4):

Haiti spelled in all capital letters.  Every letter is an acrostic letter, none are telestic.  And there's the hook, my name (red highlight).

Is that random?  Or was it contrived to let us know Mr. Gann knew this would happen Haiti would happen on January 10, 2012?  

After seeing several observations in the current 16 observations most were, let's say, "adequate."   Few were as dispositive as was Haiti.  The last observation that occurred after the beginning of the MOT was powerful...it was the hook that keeps me coming back.  In my view, is was equally as conclusive as Haiti.  It is the 2007 Sumatra earthquake:

Again, every letter is an acrostic letter.  And there's that hook; the name in red.

*******

Except for the errors I will find, this concludes the data gathering.  The next essay will include the conclusions as to whether Mr. Gann foresaw these earthquakes.  And one final planned essay will attempt to correlate the physical events with the the messages "ens" and "sne."

Jim Ross