April 30, 2016

No, Jim, it is May 1, 2016.  Well, not exactly.  During one of my exercises/experiments in a very long day yesterday, I'd isolated the missing letters derived from spelling 45 of the great earthquakes from the acrostic and telestic letters nearest the date of their occurrence in the "Map of Time" found in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  There were 72 missing letters in that iteration of the experiment.  And then I got the idea to assign a Luo Clement (Pythagorean) value to each of the 72 letters and they added to 354.

72 or 1/5th of the circle; the pentagonal time division about which Bradley Cowan wrote a book.  354, the number of days in the Hebrew lunar calendar.  I discarded that particular iteration of the 'experiment' because it contained some subjective elements. It came back to haunt me this morning at about 3am, somewhere between sleep and awake.

So I woke up thinking about April 30, 2016.  Background; flash back to January 28, 2015, I'd confirmed my name was intentionally placed in TTTTA in 1927 by finding my street address in TTTTA.  Why was January 28 important.  WD Gann predicted the date I'd make that discovery.  From page 75 of TTTTA:

January 28, 1927 plus 88 years and you have the exact date I found my street address encoded in TTTTA along with a Pythagorean right triangle emblazened in its letter and line arrangement.  That is the "7th Prophecy."

This last week I identified a second very prominent date associated with my name (spelled not once but twice in red below) and it was April 30:

As I laid there, I wondered, as I had last week anticipated that date, April 30... I wondered if anything I did yesterday, April 30, reached the level of discovery that occurred January 28, 2015.  [Actually, I had found something that will be discussed in a later essay in the "ENS" series.]

What was startling about yesterday?  Nothing reached the January 28 level, until I started thinking about the nature of the MOT this morning.  Then, there it was.  The MOT is not the 2-dimensional concept it appears to be on paper.  It is not the angular 3-dimensional, simple symmetric "V;" no, it is the curvilinear "conical helix" conceived and briefly commented upon by Bradley Cowan in "Four Dimensional Stock Market Structures and Cycles" page 34.

On the left, the curvilinear conical helix conceived by physicist and as portrayed by Wolfram.  On the right is the "Map of Time" as I pictured its 84 years of descending dates from 1848, reaching a bottom apex at 1932 and then ascending to 2016.

The problem with the MOT is its linear, two dimensional depiction.  Space-time is not linear as the chart on the right alludes.  Contrary to my initial impression that what happens on the left side of the MOT happens on the same line on the right side of the MOT, it doesn't.  But it comes close.  As the great physicist said, "it rhymes."  It is not linear.

On the right left of the MOT we find 9/11 on line 2699 (yellow highlight below).  9/11 might be characterized as a surprise aviation terrorist attack by an enemy that had, years before, declared war on the United States.  On the left side of the MOT we find Colonel Benjamin Grierson's 1863 cavalry raids (red highlight) designed to focus Confederate attention away from the turning point battles of Vicksburg and the staging of Gettysburg.

The two events are not on the same line...but they "rhyme."  They're close.  [For your convenience and to illustrate, I have marked the MOT in the third insert with the years 1863 (Grierson), 2001 (9/11), 1919 (Treaty of Versailles) and 1945 (average surrender of Germany and Japan).] 

The terror attacks of 9/11 are the historical repetition of Grierson's raids at so many levels of meaning and circumstance which are recounted in the many essays in this blog.  

Grierson's raids and 9/11 are not on the same line because the MOT is not linear.  It is curvilinear as is the conical helix.  Each of the 42 sections or cycles within the MOT are curved upwards.  No, there are not 36 chapter divisions of TTTTA but 42 sections as proven by the intentionally miss-numbered Chapter 39 "Robert Gordon's Seven Days."  42 cycles, each with 360 degrees but very different numbers of days.  42 cycles that climb the conical helix of the MOT.

The same comparison as Grierson and 9/11 can be made with the Treaty of Versailles ending WWI and the separate surrenders of Germany and Japan ending WWII.  Take the average of the later two dates and compare it to the date of the Treaty of Versailles.  The MOT will find the date of the Treaty of Versailles only a few lines below the average of the end dates of WWII.  Try it.  I did.  Look at where the years 1919 and 1945 appear in the third insert.

There are too many implications of the finding that the MOT is a conical helix.  That's not what I intended to present here.  Not even close.

*******

If this conical helix finding proves to be as important as I presently believe, it is the link between having a device that generally implies history repeating to one that predicts exactly.  Its a big deal born entirely of analytical thought.  It is not a result of correlation.  Correlation will prove the "natural law" if it is present.  It will not identify that law.

This last week I noticed five or so dates associated with my name encoded in TTTTA and mused "might something happen on that day?"  I was appropriately reminded by a commenter that I needed to prove the dates of predictions by correlating data with my model of the future before making predictions.  Point taken well given my "great mistake."  In my defense, I had not made a prediction, only expressing my wonder if anything of note would happen.  More-so than inferring a great seismic event for April 30 (one of the dates), I was wondering if some personal break through might occur in my research on April 30.

And it did or I believe it has.  The conical helix interpretation of the MOT I expect, without any more than personal belief, will become very important when proven by data.

"But" you say, "you perceived these things half asleep, half awake on May 1."  Depends on your calendar.  Refer back to first two paragraphs of this essay; the Hebrew lunar calendar.  The Hebrew calendar day begins with sunset.  What I discovered (pending proof) this morning occurred, hmmm, April 30 if that day, so named, is counted as beginning at the sunset preceding that moment.

In my personal belief, and that's the only thing that counts, WD Gann predicted I would make this discovery on the day when it occurred.

Jim Ross