SPX $1892 Monday or Tuesday according to the square of 9?

Reading yet another newsletter that called the SPX top in at March 6, 2014 price of 1884 based on a simple square of 9 application.  The analyst put 677 in the center of the square of 9 and found 1884 on the north cardinal cross.  The conclusion drawn was that March 6, 2014 might have been the high (the analyst used other metrics as well).  That perked me up, but it didn’t tell me when.  But the square of 9 struck several discords with me.  Why use the closing price on 3/9/2009 to infer the final high for the market at some unspecified future point?  Here’s a replica of his chart with both the price and the cell count in the cell (the analyst had only the price in the cell):

I don’t think the method is invalid.  But it seems kinda puny to forecast only the price.  What assumption do you make when the market gets there; immediate touch and reversal?  My understanding is that Gann tried to coordinate time and price in square of 9 projections.  I’ve read Gann was often seen on the NYSE floor with only a square of 9 chart and an ephemeris.  Let’s look at the SPX square of 9 chart with the low price in the center and make some observations of both time and price:

I spotted a couple numbers that I liked based on my bias for March 30, 2014.  On the diagonal cross at 225* I found 1849 as a number of days since the March 9, 2009 low and I found on that same diagonal a price of 1892 which is close to the current high of 1884.   The 1849 days is noteworthy because March 6, 2009 plus 1849 days is April 1, 2014…darn close to the my March 30, 2014 projection.  And, as I recall, the March 2009 low was a “straddle.”  DJIA bottomed March 6, 2009 while SPX bottomed March 9, 2009.  On top of that, I recall the low SPX print was in the first hour of trading on March 9, 2009.  April 1 is pretty close to March 31.  Duh.

So what, the 1892 square of 9 price falls on the same diagonal cross 225* as 1849 days?  Still not a lot of meat on that bone.  So I tried to find some astro reason why that date might be important. I couldn’t find a thing by charting the planets on the outer ring.  So I set my outer ring back from April 1, 2014 to Sunday March 30, 2014 and what did I realize? 

Sun/Moon conjunct at 9* is 144* from the 225* diagonal which contains the 1849 days (April 1, 2014) and a price of 1892.  As I often say, you just can’t make that stuff up.

It’s a little inexact.  If you look at the number, SM conjunct actually occurs at about 9.9*, not the 9* that the charting software displays, but you can shimmy that 225* to 226* which will give you 144* and a price of 1891 and 1848 days.  I rather like 1848 days a bit better because it gives me Monday, March 31, 2014 which is, in substance, the March 30, 2014 top I’ve been pounding on for a month.

There’s a little more but I’ll just point you to the previously posted Saturn/Uranus essay that supports March 30, 2014, again, Monday March 31,2014 in substance.

So, I’m looking for SPX 1891 Monday or 1892 Tuesday (about 1.8%).  [Out of full disclosure, I've used the same method to project QQQs $94 on Monday, a very unlikely event that would require an 8% increase in 1 day.  Done before but unlikely.]

Crash and burn time for my projections.  It'll be back to the books to ferret out the likely errors in my understanding and methods.

Jim