John Dee^2=Francis Bacon and Francis BaconX.5=WD Gann and some error corrections

In the previous essay I presented the calculations of the individual and aggregated "numbers" of WD Gann and Francis Bacon according to four Elizabethan ciphers believed to have been used extensively by William Shakespeare (a pen name of Francis Bacon according to Richard Allan Wanger) and the Pythagorean cipher according to Luo Clement's (a pen name of WD Gann, IMO) table appearing in "The Ancient Science of Numbers."  As an aside, I provided the same numbers according to the five ciphers.  The numbers of Mr. Gann and Lord Bacon are correct based on my many iterations of checking on the below spreadsheet:

As you can see, I have added Dr. John Dee, correspondent of Queen Elizabeth I (believed by many to be the biologic mother of Lord Francis Bacon), magician, alchemist, mathematician, astronomer of Queen Elizabeth's court, private tutor and mentor of Lord Bacon, and a person notably encoded into the acrostic and telestic messages of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" exactly 46 times (45 times as "Dee" and 1 times as "007").  Obviously, Dr. John Dee was of importance to WD Gann and Lord Francis Bacon.

The color coding of the above spreadsheet is explained in the immediately preceding essay.  John Dee does not have substantial color coding suggesting there is something very different in his relation to those two men that is the relation between those two men.  I'm sure we can find some apparent similarity in numbers of all three (and I have) but not nearly as emphatic as the colored relationships.  There is, however, one item of importance that will tie Dr. Dee to his apparent students.

First though, consider, WD Gann is, arguably, the continuation of Lord Francis Bacon according to the green spreadsheet numbers.  WD Gann is 9 / 18 = .5  and Lord Bacon is 34 / 17 = 2....together they are .5 X 2 = 1.  Together, they are unity.  Without searching Richard Allan Wagner's brilliant book "The Lost Secret of William Shakespeare" I recall Lord Bacon coding into Shakespeare's works his intent to return to the earthly plane to complete his work.  Use your imagination.  WD Gann was born one interval of John Dee's "philosopher stone number" or "252" years, or the "Monas Heiroglyphica number," from the year Lord Bacon passed; 1626 + 252 = 1878.

So what, then, is notable about John Dee's numbers in relation to the others and to which I allude?  The dark green numbers of John Dee are the same Pythagorean cipher calculation of given and surname as were used to compute WD Gann as "the completion" of Lord Bacon in the foregoing paragraph.  What relation might they hold?  Lord Bacon was, by those light green numbers, "2".  John Dee is 20 / 14 = 1.42857 or, within 2/100ths of the square root of 2.  If you varied either the numerator or denominator by 1, you cannot get closer to the square root of two.  If you square John Dee's ratio of given and surname, you get 2, that being the same ratio as that of Lord Bacon.  And from that mathematic reality, I symbolically offer:

WD Gann is the completion of Lord Francis Bacon 

who is the exponential evolution of Dr. John Dee

As demonstrated, it is mathematically true according to Pythagorean vibration.  Almost Shakespearean in poetic thought.

Now for the major errors in my calculations of Mason and Rosicrucian.  There were so many errors in the previous essay's enumeration of those names its useless to recount them.  Here are the recalculations along with additional notables:

Parsing entity names as opposed to person's names is unsatisfying.  For example, do we say Mason, Freemason or the plural versus plural of either?  Similarly with the other names.  So, I present them for interest only for the time being and hope that the errors will weed themselves out over time and before I decide I want to figure out how I might evaluate them.

Is this possible in our world of randomness and the Gaussian probability we are taught, almost as if a religion?

Jim Ross