In the previous five essays, the following sequence of evidence discovery contends that TTTTA is connected with the movie "Knowing:"
- The numbers 11, 77 and 88 were identified as important in TTTTA by multiple levels of evidence Here, here, and here to link just a few . Think about it, Flights 11 and 77 of the 9/11 attacks the sum of which is 88. Interesting curiosity among many, as the numbers are the only three two-digit number encoded in TTTTA that consist of the same digit. Those numbers were again confirmed as important as they reduce to provide the number 257, one of only 4 know "Fermat numbers" theorized by Pierre de Fermat, whose name appears encoded in TTTTA to emphasize, again, the importance of 11, 77 and 88.
- As well, previous essays have found the name of Ryne Douglas Pearson, the author of the movie "Knowing," encoded in TTTTA, among many other such synchronicities, suggesting a relationship between these fictional works despite the 82 years that separate them,
- And the numbers 88, 77 and 11 are found in the movie "Knowing" at a frequency of 1, 2 and 3 times, respectively, and correlate with the dates of disaster on October 15, 17 and 19 (three essays immediately preceding this essay).
- The strongest links between the two fictional works are those above except for one. The discovery of 9/11 and the innocent deaths that occurred that day encoded into TTTTA:
That's what I saw on exactly 9/11/2015 in the MOT, substantially the same thing that Professor Koestler, the key character of the movie, saw on the mysterious page of numbers. It indicated a map of time. On the right, the date, 9/11/01 and one the left the descending cumulative and chapter page numbers, 2693 + 283 = 2976 plus 1=2977 because there are two dates on that line and 9/11 is the larger. 2977, the number of innocent lives lost that day (excluding 19 terrorists). You can replicate that synchronicity yourself as I have made WD Gann "Map of Time" available for free download at Here. You will find the date on line 2699 and to its right, the cumulative line and chapter number 2978. This time you subtract one day to get to 2977; you provide the rationale.
The numbers 88, 77 and 11 correlate with the dates, October 15, 17 and 19 which, in this 84th year since the last day of the TTTTA in August 1932, brings us to those dates predicting similar disasters on those days in 2016. The number 84 represents Mr. Gann's lamentation on page 84 of TTTTA that people will not study the Bible to know what is coming.
I will offer three proofs of the inclusion of those dates, originating in "Knowing" being similarly and intentionally presented in TTTTA. Two of the proofs will appear in this essay. The weakest but most profound proof will be reserved for the final essay.
First proof. Three great events in "Knowing" that occurred on October 15, 17 and 19 of 2009 will recur in 2016 on those days but not in those same locations (New York, Boston) nor will the nature of the events be the same. Three numbers important to WD Gann in TTTTA. We traced the numbers from TTTTA to "Knowing" in the previous three essays but we haven't traced the the dates from Knowing back to TTTTA. Can that be done? Wouldn't you expect that to be tendered as proof by Mr. Gann? The first proof will demonstrate that Mr. Gann intentionally encoded both the names of the cities to be affected by events on the three named dates in the acrostic/telestic coding and in the "in plain sight narrative."
October 15, LA California. This is the first of the three dates correlated between "Knowing" and TTTTA and it involves, singularly, Los Angeles, California. It appears on page 284. You find Los Angeles in the simple narrative in bold italics and "LA California" in the acrostic/telestic encoding. LA, in red highlight, appears on the same line as 10/15, also in red. California in blue:
October 17, Rio Grande. Following the fictional destruction of Los Angeles, a night time attack occurs along the Rio Grande from Brownsville to El Paso. We find this second date of October 17 and Rio Grande on page 290. "Rio Grande" is spelled in the simple narrative (bold italics), and is spelled the same word in acrostic/telestic letters (red highlight). Added is the word "El Paso" (in tan, which was the line from El Paso to Brownsville along the Rio Grande). To keep it simple, the following restricts the "proof" to the words, "Rio Grande" in red and in bold italics in the narrative and "El Paso" in tan.
Were one to expand the span of lines and permit minor re use of letters used by other words, you'd find Los Angeles, San Francisco, Brownsville and tectonic plates (Here). The span of the words of the linked image and the narrative meaning the area surrounding the date give you a full perspective of October 15, 17 and 19; tectonic plates, attacks, great destruction of San Francisco. Noteworthy, a comment is made regarding the terrific loss of life in San Francisco (highlighted in yellow) which is absent in the destruction of Los Angeles or the attacks along the Rio Grande.
October 19, San Francisco. Following the attack along the line of the Rio Grande is the fictional attack on San Francisco and we find its final destruction on page 295. We find San Francisco aligned with 10/19, again both in red highlight:
Again, San Francisco is spelled both in narrative and in acrostic/telestic encoding proximate the date October 19.
Second proof. I hadn't any doubt the theme of 11, 77 and 88 would be encoded in these events in TTTTA. Initially, I'd taken the line on which each of the three dates appeared and converted them to their number equivalent and expected to find all three before each line's final reduction to a single digit. I found that to be true for the first and third events but there wasn't any text associated with the second event. I assumed that if I found 11 associated with the last event and 88 associated with the first event, the difference would be Mr. Gann's intention concerning the second event. Not true, when I began writing this section of this essay, I'd missed a word in one line and, enumerating the letters "on the fly" provided another error. Those two lines I thought gave me 88 and 11; they didn't. Still, I knew 11, 77 and 88 had to be somehow associated with these three events.
Overthinking. What pages are page numbers on which these events appear? Page 284, 290 and 295. And their reduction to single digits, as we found in the essay on the de Fermat number number 257 is 5, 2 and 7. Remember this conversion of the numbers 11, 77 and 88 to the Fermat number 257 on the right below:
On the left you have the conversion that occurred from 11, 77 and 88 to derive the Fermat 257 that was presented in the second essay of this series. On the right you have the conversion from page numbers to the digits of the Fermat number 257. Out of the many three-digit combinations one could make out of ten digits (is it ten factorial minus seven factorial, I don't recall), we found the correct three numbers 2, 5 and 7. I don't like the fact that the events are not in the order of the de Fermat number. The Fermat number is 257 and if we preserve that number on the right, the dates are not in chronological order.
Nevertheless let's close the very simple second proof saying, we found the 11, 77 and 88 in TTTTA's proxy, the Fermat number 257. The dates aren't ordered but the digits are there.
The mystery of the unordered Fermat number. There, I feel better. New thought; let's resolve the order and the correct locations.
Perhaps the true order of events is different than the order presented in the narrative of TTTTA:
Perhaps instead of LA > Rio > SF, the order should be Rio > LA > SF. That gives you the Fermat number. And there's a faint recognition of work I had done before. Yes, it is "San Andreas" and I've written several essays on that 2015 movie.
San Andreas was a component of my "great mistake." I found many messages in TTTTA's acrostic telestic encoding indicating there would be a great earthquake with greatest likelihood of happening on February 23, 2016 as recounted above. In "Knowing" I found the simpler messages about characters, symbols, imagery and the dates, October 15, 17, and 19. In "San Andreas," I found the primary characters encoded, the message "Andreaas," "Huuver Dam," etc. I did not find any dates. There is a striking absence of dates; you won't find one anywhere in the move, written or spoken. I couldn't reconcile the February 23 date to the timeline of TTTTA's fictional war. I finally ran out of time before February 23 and, as I admit, I ran around like Chicken Little proclaiming something about which I hadn't the full proof of timing. I stated the limitation of the work and assumed the worst and accepted the indignity of error.
It was blessing I was wrong but my being wrong was by degree. The largest earthquake to hit the 48 in 14 months occurred that day in Wasco CA, about mid way between SF and LA. It was a 4.9M that wouldn't have put a ripple in a cup of coffee in SF or LA. And it hit on exactly February 23, 2016.
This time its different, I have correlation of "Knowing" and TTTTA bordering on mathematic proof of the dates. October 15, 17 and 19 might work out to be a non event, but I do not believe so.
So, here's the new "San Andreas" connection and how it may solve the mystery of the unordered Fermat number. In San Andreas, the initial event of the three earthquakes in that movie occurred in Las Vegas. It was Las Vegas > Los Angeles > San Francisco. If the Rio Grande event were replaced by Las Vegas, the we have the perfect 2 > 5 >7 order...don't we?
TTTTA has Rio Grande encoded in it....but, does it have Las Vegas in it as well? Yes. Remember the first TTTTA excerpt that had "Rio Grande" in it above? You can find Las Vegas in it as well:
If you take away the "G" and an "a" from Rio Grande (in green) you can spell Las Vegas (now red highlighted). Remove the Rio Grande, add Las Vegas...Hoover Dam.
With Las Vegas > Los Angeles > San Francisco, we now have the perfect Fermat order, the exact sequence and locations of "San Andreas" and the exact dates of "Knowing."
*******
If you wanted to warn and convince a future generation of "remarkable events" in their time could the message be delivered with a book that was written 84 years earlier; one that was not exactly a best seller even in 1927? Or would you (not as if either you or Mr. Gann could have accomplished movie production from the grave), possessing foresight, use that foresight of popular 21st century movies to spread your foreknowledge? I doubt there are many people, whether 15 or 50, who are reading TTTTA these days. The delivery vehicles "Knowing" primarily and secondarily, San Andreas, would be far more effective in our age than a 1927 romance and war novel.
If I lived on the Pacific Coast, I wouldn't watch "San Andreas" or even "Knowing" for that matter. Modern "science" has indicated it cannot predict an earthquake but it also says the "odds" are high one will occur within the 30-year time period on the Pacific Coast. One that could be the "Really Big One," (Cascadia subduction) and/or a San Andreas event. Its a "risk reward" if you live there. Your call.
I've presented evidence of Mr. Gann's foresight throughout this site for the last two years. And I have presented, in these last six essays, predictions of events in October and what I consider to be the 'evidence.' I don't have any skin in this game; I don't live there and I don't get so much as a click fee for the work I do. If you live, you should seriously consider reading and back testing my work. My "evidence" can be wrong, my conclusions might be wrong...or they might be right. I certainly believe they are.
I have made available for free download the WD Gann "Map of Time" for the period 1932-2100 so you can prove or disprove the work to yourself.
84 years between the last day in the 1927 novel "The Tunnel Thru the Air" which was August 30, 1932 and the movie, "Knowing." Again, WD Gann's lamentation on page 84:
Jim Ross
Hi,
ReplyDeleteYour work, and the scope of knowledge and time you have put into it are, for lack of a better phrase,
"of the highest caliber". I always try to keep up with your posts (and to a lessor degree, interpret them !). The recent entries concerning the numbers [ 11, 77, 88, and 257) got me to trying to find them within the confines of the the DJIA. What I found would be too much of a stretch to attribute to chance. I am not sure how to post a chart but if you start looking at the DJIA from 1987 forward you will see what I mean.
Best of things to you, please keep up the ground-breaking work (and idea's).
Jeff
Thank you Jeff. Make sure you check the simple relation of 58 years from 1929 to 1987 and 29 years from 1987 to October 19, 2016. To the day. Its published in the blog somewhere.
ReplyDeleteJim