October 19, 2016; The final number "11" and the third and final "Knowing" event

In the previous three essays I've demonstrated that WD Gann intentionally encoded three numbers, 11, 77 and 88, in his 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air," asserted that each of the three numbers are encoded into the contemporary 2009 movie "Knowing" and have presented the evidence for those contentions to this point and but for the number 11.  The number, 11, is the subject of this essay.  The most powerful bit of evidence will be reserved for the last paragraph.  You will then recognize you have already seen the number 11 encoded in this essay, (ignoring the four occurrence of the numbers "11").  You saw it but did you observe it?

I will reserve further for the next essay of this series, Mr. Gann's profound prediction, in my subjective opinion (to be intentionally redundant) which is corroborated by "Knowing."

We know where Mr. Gann encoded the numbers 11, 77 and 88 and now we know where 88 and 77 are encoded in "Knowing."  Each is encoded into "Knowing.  "88" is the Pythagorean reflection of the fated airplane's symbol that appears once in the first disaster of "Knowing"; EC-VJL.  "77" is the Pythagorean reflection of the street intersection in New York City, "LafayetteWorthNYC" and we see it twice; the first time on Professor Koestler's GPS and again on the street signs.

11.  To remind us of where we find the one and only one encoding of 11 in telestic/acrostic messages here is that encoding found on page 70:

As often is the case, my name is spelled in red near the item of designed importance; in this case the number 11 highlighted in yellow.  There is a date highlighted in light green that is on the same line as the 11; 1/26/2001.  I will explain the importance of that date at the end of the essay as well.

The frequently used method of Pythagorean substitution works again.  There are 9 characters in "Knowing," two of whom had passed on and you do not see them in the movie but on whom the storyline rests, and 7 characters that are alive and to whom reference is made.(1)  The Pythagorean number of their first name, according to the preference of Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers" is:

The two characters who passed and poetically reunited with the 'all' or the 'one,' Allison and Lucinda, are each enumerated as 1 which is concatenated to produce 11, highlighted in red.   So quickly, we have the key, 11.

We are given a further gift; the movie uses the additional 7 characters that identify WD Gann.  I arrange them left to right according to my personally perceived importance to the storyline.  Its slightly arguable.  John (Nicolas Cage) is vastly more important that Kim, who does not have a speaking role.   That's an indisputable conclusion.  Whether Diana is more important that Abby, well, that's my judgement.  

So obvious.  WD Gann's first and last name enumeration is 9-9 and that of the subdivided characters is 9-9.  We see consecutive 9's three times above; we see them as the reduction of the names of Phil and Priscilla or 9-9 highlighted wholly in yellow, we see them as the reductions of the number 2-5-2 and 3-9-9-6, highlighted in blue and yellow, respectively, and Mr. Gann's names highlighted in blue and yellow.  Again, so obvious, and three times, so emphatic.

Another gift; John Dee's philosopher stone number or the "Monas Hieroglyphica" number, 252.  John Dee's greatest student, Lord Francis Bacon, who passed in 1561, some 252 years before WD Gann was born (1878).  Every time I offer that thought and its obvious inference, I have to go to Google and check the date Lord Bacon passed and then subtract 1561 from 1878.  It always, always turns out the same; 252 years; it would seem a "natural law."

[You can derive many important numbers from the numbers 252 and 3996, but I won't go there.]

*******

I made two promises for the end of this essay; that I'd show you where you had read the number 11 by the end of that first paragraph of this essay and a meaning of the date, January 26, 2001, found on page 70 and on the same line as the encoded "11"

The first appearance of 11.  In the title you will find October 19, 2016 once.  Like other essays dealing with a future date and a series of essays on that day, I put it in the title of this essay.  I didn't realize it would work out like this.   Similar to 9/11/01, in which you suppress the year to get 9/11, but with 10/19/16, you suppress the year to get 10/19, but you go one step farther, you reduce the numbers to get (1+0) / (1+9) or 1 / 1.  Without intending to do so, I embedded, encoded 11 in the title.  I only realized it yesterday.  You 'saw' it in the title, did you 'observe' it?  October 19, 2016, which reduces to "11" as described, is the first word of this essay; the first word you saw.

[It might be noted not reducing the 19 to 1 would give you 1/19. the reverse of which is the 911 terror attack.]

Now consider, the date in the movie "Knowing" of the great and final event occurs in 2009, not 2016.  That date could be evaluated as 10/19/2009 or 1/1/11 by reduction.  Twin "11"s.

All told, I count 3 appearances of the number "11" as outlined.  The number "88" appeared once and the number "77" appeared twice in "Knowing" as recounted in the third paragraph above.  The number "11" appears three times as described.

The date, January 26, 2001.  January 26, 2001, the date highlighted in green on the same line as the encoded 11.  It is the date of the tragic 2001 Gujarat earthquake that killed between 13 and 20 thousand.  Is it coincidence that it appears on the same line as "11?"  The inference I draw is October 19, 2016 will be an earthquake; a great earthquake.

As always, this is my interpretation of TTTTA.    That's the nature of deciphering another person's communication spoken, written or encoded; finding understanding.  Reaching a point of "Knowing."

I've provided all the evidence that I have at this moment that persuades me so that you can reach your own conclusion.

More to follow.

Jim Ross

(1)  Note: 7/20/16.  I have omitted Jessica, Spencer and Stacy students in Prof. Koester's MIT astrophysics class, extremely minor contextual characters.  I considered that a minor commission and did not feel the need to revise my work.  Today I find I omitted Prof. Koestler's father, mother and his sister Grace.  The father and Grace did have more that one-liners.  I did not make those omissions on purpose.  I will have to consider their numbers at a later date.  For now, the findings of "11" remain unaffected but the lesser implication of Mr. Gann's "99" is pending.  And, I can only imagine and trust it happened this way for a reason.