Monday, September 21, 2015

"Begin(ing) right" on the WD Gann Map of Time of mankind

The WD Gann Map of Time (MOT) is explained in the immediately preceding post and is developed in more detail in three posts provisos thereto.  What's missing is how to "begin right" (page 78 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air):


If the MOT's method is to find the point (date) of inflection where on the left side we have events of the previous 84 years and use those events to predict future events, then we need to know what day that date of inflection of the 168 year period occurs.

Assuming that the greatest dates of events of the 168 year period were the end of WWI and WWII, then I calculate July 1, 1932 as follows:


No, its not the last date in TTTTA (August 30, 1932, the "Peace Conference of the World").  At least in my opinion.  Wouldn't that be a tad easy for a person having spent hundreds of hours, now, trying to unravel all this?  Nothing is easy.

And its not the 4th of July, the date of the final "Battle of Washington" as such a person, having read the book in minute detail to include encoded acrostic and telestic message.  No, it would have been much to easy.  Nothing is free.

In my opinion, the final date is mathematically derived as above; not subjectively, poetically derived.

Why mid year?  Well, I can only guess.  There wasn't a 0 A.D (Google "0 A.D" and read Wikipedia). so half of that year was removed to B.C. and half to A.D.  Hence, each 168 component of the 15 parts of the Biblical week (15 parts at 168 years per part 2520 years) begins and ends mid year.

As we might suspect from a study of the WD Memorial Triangle (GMT), the MOT forms an isosceles triangle and a straight line based on there 3 dates:


The above includes 3 excerpts out of my daily MOT spreadsheet (one line for every day between 1848 and 2016, 84 years of days in the left two columns and 84 years in the right two columns, "folded" at the "right beginning," July 1, 1932).  

The total span between WWII dates of 9/2/1945 and 5/7/1945 above is 118 lines (lines 4810 minus 4692).  And the span between the WWI date of 6/28/1919 and each of the two dates in WWII is 59 lines (4810 minus 4751 and 4751 minus 4692).  

If we were to try to create a triangle out of side lengths of 118, 59 and 59, it isn't a triangle….it is a straight line.  If you were to construct it out of the visual plot of the spreadsheet, you'd have an isosceles triangle that has a width of 118 and a height of 30681 (25930 + 4751) or very high.  One very small angle at point 6/28/1939 and two very large equal angles at points 9/2/1945 and 5/7/1945.

Recall the WD Gann Memorial Triangle has both space dimensions in terms of miles and time dimension in terms of years.  The former a right triangle and the latter a straight line.  Perhaps we have the demonstration that, absent a measure of space (miles, feet, inches) we have a chart of space that gives us a spacial orientation in 4 dimensions and a corresponding time straight line; a triangle that we can see on the chart (hmmm, like price on a stock chart...) and a line we can sense as forward time.   A triangle and a line.  How basic.

Just talking out loud.  The point of this post is July 1, 1932.  

Jim Ross 



4 comments:

  1. An aside..I thought Gann used a Hebrew Calendar. 30 Aug was the end of an 18 Year lunar period. 1932 + 18 is 1950. MW was written in 1950 as was the booklet, Looking ahead to 1950. Coincidence that both would be 1932+18? 1932-18=1914 gann notes this year a lot, as he does 1914-18=1896

    ReplyDelete
  2. I can't address the Hebrew lunar calendar vs 365.25 days per year, except to say 12 lunations at 29.5 days per lunation does not work well, in the short term, with dominant cycle which is 24 hours in a day. Which is not to deny the moon its role at all, nor the sun. I'm restricting myself to the strongest of the gravity wells affecting us, the earth. It takes bigger numbers to reconcile the earths rotation and still bigger numbers to reconcile the earth, moon and sun's periods.

    Thomas Troward, a great Biblical scholar (see his book "Biblical Prophec the years 1914 to 1923 written in 1923) and on the "real" WD Gann reading list [I believe the list of a dozen books plus published by Roger Brothers is the "real" list as opposed to his list of books for sale] does not use either 354 or 365.242 are the Biblical annual cycle. Rather he uses 360 years to constitute 1 day and then 7 days to constitute a year and that results in 360 years/day X 7 =2520 which is the Biblical "Great week;" the duration of the rule of the gentiles or "the Rule of the Gentiles. All that would point me to think not only are 354 and 365.242 in play, so too is 360.

    BTW, I've read the lamentations of both Mr. Gann and Sepharial at astrologers being unable to predict the onset and/or end of WWI. Thomas Troward alludes to the end of WWI in 1919 in the above title. Of course, Mr. Gann predicted the end of WWI as I am told by an astrologer who gave Mr. Gann credit for having used astrology to make that calculation….even all other astrologers could not. Well, where did he say he used astrology to make that calculation.

    I boil down to this. I've been given 15,340 as a very very credible line count which happens to reconcile to 365.242. So I'll be down that road until it proves me wrong.

    I have read somewhere Mr. Gann used the Hebrew calendar. I doubt he said it but I have hardly the understanding of other things he wrote as I do TTTTA. On the other hand, he spells out the outline of Isaiah 9:10 pretty darn well (the stones or buildings have fallen, the sycamore replaced by the cedar, etc)….and 83 years before Rabbi Cahn did in 2010 (1927 vs 2010). I am sure Mr. Gann had a firm grasp of the Hebrew calendar.

    83….wait till you see my next essay. Pg 83 to incorrectly paraphrase out of recall, "It is the duty of men of math and science to warn people of the future." I believe TTTTA was his warning to us.

    Thanks, Jim

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Jim... for reference you may like to read http://www.amazon.com/Eclipses-Lunations-Astrology-Sam-Bartolet/dp/0866900586 ...one page you may like is "August 1932 a cycle year"

    ReplyDelete
  4. How intriguing, August 1932. I know the name Sam Bartolet but do not have the book in my PC library. Can't find a copy outside of purchasing it and I've got too much on my plate to deviate. In my 'to do' when I turn to the second great 'gravity well' which I believe is the moon.

    Thanks for the heads up,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.