The Map of Time part 3; restriction of the MOT to the realm of 'mankind', special relativity and vibration

If you try to apply the MOT to the stock market, to your family tree, to the USA or Russia to find comparable dates, you won't be happy.  It is the related to the whole of mankind.  Only events happening to the whole of mankind will find repetition.  That's putting the end before the beginning.

The most dramatic of the events that I have backtested on the MOT is the endings of WWI and WWII.  They work perfectly to the year.  More than that, if you wish to establish the "correct beginning" to the MOT for mankind for daily purposes, I suspect those repeating events in history will backward identify the correct day which is the "correct beginning."  It is not the last day in TTTTA as best I currently reckon.  That would be far to easy.  Mr. Gann won't give us his most prized secrets.  When I backward computed it in the wee hours of this morning based on the end of WWI and WWII I was stunned.  Not the first time have I been stunned in this endeavor.  But I have pondered that date only briefly as yet so I'll hold on to it a bit longer.

The beginning, what did Mr. Gann say about the "right beginning" in TTTTA?  Pg 78:

What's the right beginning?  Its a reference point for BOTH time and space.  Planning a trip from Virginia Beach to Brooklyn, among other things, I need to know from where I start and what time I start.  Knowing my average speed, number of stops, number of miles between the points will not help me one bit in predicting my arrival if I do not know BOTH when I start and from where I start.  And I need to know BOTH simultaneously.  That seems pretty straightforward.  But time and space are not independent.  Likewise, we would think we need to know BOTH if we had the ability to predict the future.  Wouldn't you think?

Special relativity and the Minkowski space…. an idealized zone in spacetime where the laws of general relativity do not apply.  A place where acceleration or gravitational do not influence spacetime.  A "gravity well" where we are moving at a constant speed and where gravitation does not affect time.  Kinda like where we live…on earth, but not entirely.

Generally, we do not accelerate and we are not differentially affected by gravity.  A person standing on the equator is prevented from being affected by gravity by the ground that is below him and is traveling at just over a constant 1000 MPH hour according to the Earth's rotation.  No acceleration.  A person standing in Central Park at the 40th parallel is traveling at just under a constant 900 MPH by virtue of the smaller circumference of the earth at that parallel.  No acceleration, no differential gravitational influence.

Well, except that the moon and sun do exert relatively minor but observable gravitational and acceleration influence.  Tides rise and fall by virtue of the moons gravity.  Relative to the sun, our speed in greater and lesser at the aphelion or perihelion of the earth about the sun….speed is changing during the solar year.  Acceleration and deceleration.  We are not in a Minkowsky space, but largely we are.  And the divergences, we might consider them separately.  That's another essay.

Within those contexts what is important about the beginning for mankind?  Well, again the correct location and the correct time.  Except that the correct location on earth is not important relative to the subject of mankind.  Mankind is all over the earth.  Which location of any single person do you use to measure the beginning?  The cycle of mankind is independent of a location of beginning when measuring spacetime.  Only time is important.  Might you be prone to say "time is the most important thing?"  Wow, sounds really really familiar.

Now what if you say you wish to measure the MOT of the NYSE located at exactly at 11 Wall Street? That address doesn't change as the earth turns on its axis.  Only time will be important.  And that's yet another subject.

So, the MOT as I've currently defined it for only mankind and we can backtest its accuracy by matching events that appear on its previously defined descending and ascending 45 degree angles.  Events ignoring the location of the event;  only time has importance.  That can be backtested to the MOT.  Only vastly universal events like world wars and inventions having pervasive impact might find related historical repetition on the MOT.  That's what I've found to date.

I would submit the MOT is the general curvature of history and "curve for the future" for mankind from which Mr. Gann applied his understanding of how persons and institutions vary with the MOT depending on their individual vibrations.  Perhaps Mr. Gann had read Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers," published in 1908.  Hmmm, didn't Mr. Gann make a great discovery in 1908?

Consider again the methodology:

Past history and the "curve for the future" is the independent variable; the MOT of mankind.  The rate of vibration is the multiplier unique to person and institutions other than mankind that, when applied to the "curve," produces a different but correlated result.  The rate of vibration which might be identified for each person or institution based on the vibration apparent in their name and nativity; the specialty of Luo Clement and his "The Ancient Science of Numbers."

Perhaps Mr. Gann wrote "The Ancient Science of Numbers" himself.  I think I've written essays on that….

Jim Ross