The 2015 movie, "San Andreas," has already been cited in terms of its encoding in WD Gann's 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air." In that previous essay, we find the words for Hoover Dam and tectonic plates as children messages of the greater message "Ring In Fire." To supplement, and I am not going to provide all of the narratives, we find the following principle characters:
Ray Grimes, the Los Angeles Fire Department first responder, played by the "Rock" Dwayne Johnson, is found on lines 143-146 of the WD Gann Map of Time. The narrative is not noteworthy.
Emma Grimes, Ray's soon to be ex, can be found at line 2194 as "emah." The narrative is entirely noteworthy as it describes what you visually see when you watch the movie:
Ollie, an early teen who accompanies his brother, Daniel, and meets Blake, Rays daughter, the three of whom wander the apocalyptic San Francisco, trusting that Ray and Emma would save them. Dan and Blake are not pivot but Ollie is. Blake displays her knowledge of practical things and there comes a time when the three must make a choice. They must choose to follow the stream of people walking towards the Bay, or do as Blake says, they must go uphill, against the hordes to find a place where her father, in his helicopter, can save them. Dan wants to follow the crowd. Ollie convinces his brother with an argument similar to "You have seen the things she can do, do you follow those who have not shown you these things?" I am reminded of the many exhortations in the Bible of "you have seen these things I have done, go and tell others." I am reminded of the first line of Marie's letter of disappearance "According to your faith, be I unto you" or Mathew 9:29 and others. Ollie can be found as "olie" at line 10518. The truth from a child perhaps?
Los Angeles Fire Department, the employer of Ray, is one of the first words you see in the movie (its on Rays hard helmet aside his name) and, as if to confirm the finding of Ray's acrostic reflection in TTTTA, we as well find "lfd" as a telestic word at line 2001. I find the attendant narrative meaningful but that's me:
There's far more in acrostics/telestics that are compelling. But the above word 'signs' dwarf in comparison to more 'perfect' and objective information. Three far more important messages.
Tip the Hat
I give this acrostic phrase "Tip the Hat" the separate subsection emphasis comparable to its immense improbability. Ponder that. Mr. Gann gives us, in his 1927 "TTTTA, the Rock, Dwayne Johnson's exact words in the 2015 movie, "San Andreas." Mr. Gann gives us those words 3 times separated by a rational mathematic sequence indicating absence of randomness; those phrases were intelligently and intentionally created. Proof of design and proof of foresight.
Tip the Hat is both a telestic/acrostic phrase that proves the mathematic integrity of the Map of Time using the Tao device. In short, when we find a marker word such as "TAO" and a suspected target, such as "WAR" then we need to look equidistant from the words to discover "to." Then, we have mathematically proven, amid an infinity of improbability, the intent of the author to create the phrase "Tao to War" or, interpreted "Path to War." The prophecy of 9/11 is thus mathematically proven to have been purposefully encoded into TTTTA.
"Tip the hat" is a dramatic and dangerous helicopter maneuver which Ray performs in the first scene of San Andreas. A helicopter, in order to insert itself between two cliffs, must radically rock itself, tip itself, to get below an overhanging cliff and between the two peaks. From there Ray and crew are able to access, by line and winch, an accident victim clinging to a lower perch of the cliff.
So I said to myself, would Mr. Gann have so encoded that key phrase? He did; in three places. The first was easy to find...like 'falling off a cliff' you might say. First, I find 3 telestic/acrostic occurrences of "tip," 10 occurrences of "the" and 8 occurrences of "hat" on line numbers as follows:
My objective is to find a mathematic rule that will find the "the" between the "Tip" and the "hat." If I do, then I can satisfy myself that Mr. Gann designed this proof and that the proof included his foreknowledge of the movie, San Andreas.
There are 3 lines where we find "Tip;" 6515, 10874 and 12081. Either Mr. Gann created a systematic function that "squares up" or extrapolates out those there lines to mathematically create three phrases of "tip the hat" or all that I have studied about Mr. Gann's mathematic approach is untrue. I know an algorithm will be there. Its taken me hours, days; I believe the below only scratches the surface.
Line 6515. The first line was as easy as the latter two lines were...problematic. I found the first "the" the old fashioned way, I used endpoints of the phrase and looked in between. Since I suspected Mr. Gann counted lines in ascending fashion, I used the lowest "marker" word on line 6515 and then the lowest target word above line 6515 or 6671 and said to myself, there must be a "the" in between 6515 and 6671. And there was; it was line 6619. It was 2/3rds the 156 interval between 6515 and 6671; exactly 2/3rds and it is highlighted in yellow below. Easy.
Where in the tao device the word "to" was equidistant between "tao" and "war," this altered device is 2/3rds above the marker, "tip" or 1/3rd below the target "hat."
Line 10874. We have a problem. If you take the marker line 10874, there aren't any target lines that exceed 10874; the highest was 9812. I need to find a marker that works in mathematics 2/3rds harmony with the midpoint "the."
So what does this mean? I interpret it to mean we progress from the marker to the end of the sequence, the last line number 15340, and then "start again" as Mr. Gann told us how to count digits after the digit, 9. Its circular, we 'start again.' The 2/3rds interval, then, is from the marker to 15340 plus then from the line number of the first "the." That will be 2/3rds of the total interval which we multiply by 3/2 to extrapolate from the original marker to the target.
We have another problem...unlike the first iteration that was perfect and gave us the 2/3rd calculation, there aren't any "expected" line numbers that match the actual line numbers. The closest we get is the green highlighted 1281 expected line number and the 1210 actual line number which are 71 lines apart (70.5 if you count a decimal).
Let's table line 19874 for the moment and look at the 3rd and last "tip" line 12091.
Line 12091. It happened again. Extrapolating each "Tip" and "the" interval by 2/3rds we do not have a match between the expected line and an actual line containing "the." The closest we get is highlighted in blue, a failure by 71 lines, and the next closest we get is highlighted in purple, a failure by 114 lines.
Has the algorithm failed? Do we have an absence of a system Mr. Gann may have designed to supplement the already recognizable improbability of "Tip the hat" occurring in both 1927 TTTTA and 2015 San Andreas? Maybe. Maybe not. Mr. Gann would, in my mind, never miss such a teachable moment for someone who has worked so hard.
Always looking at the numbers, I'm starting to notice something. There seems to be some relationships in those remainders 70.5, 71 and 114. Yes, there is:
We have the sides of the Kepler triangle, 1, Phi, Phi ^2:
It appears we have a progression of remainders that form the proportions of the Kepler triangle. I don't know what it means. But I know it isn't random. I have so many more questions regarding every one of those line numbers and their resolution but there simply is not enough time. The main point; Mr. Gann had an opportunity to design a mathematic system out of the "Tip the hat" encoded phrase that demonstrates both his intent and his foresight... I am satisfied he did. But that's me.
*******
I believe there is a lot more to the "tip the hat" proof and my intuition tells me it goes to the heart of how time cycles might be mathematically constructed; a progression of exponents and relations among diatonic tones (note, there are 8 permutations above similar to 8 notes in the diatonic scale and 7 intervals). But that's my imagination and I go down as many (far more) dead ending paths than otherwise.
What is apparent from the whole of the above is the several important words that demonstrate the foresight; that WD Gann saw the emergence of the movie San Andreas and he wanted us to take notice. The integrity of the "tip of hat" would be only a "tip of the hat" to the detective who solves it or to the one who envisioned it.
In addition to all of the above, I believe Mr. Gann wants us to heed the simple conversation Ollie has with his brother; "You have seen these things she could do. We do not need to follow the crowd. We need to follow her."
Sound familiar?
Jim Ross
A post publication note important to me. When I found the first of 3 instances of "tip the hat" formed a perfect 2/3rds relation of spacing intervals, I breathed a sigh and believed the remaining 2 phrases would be easy to prove as being 'systemic.' Like shooting fish in a barrel. That was not the case. The closest I could come out of all the permutations of locations of the three words comprising the phrase was a 70.5 line remainder. So I skipped to the 3rd observation of "tip" to see if I could do better. At first, I found one that was 114 lines off and pretty much immediately recognized the first and third remainders gave me 114/70.5= 1.617...Phi. But it just didn't exhibit a system among the three....just two of the three observations.
I worked for hours. I slept on it and worked for hours again. I knew the system was there. I knew Mr. Gann would hide it deeply but it would be there. And then, I turned off the TV that keeps me company every day and I prayed that I would find the system. Praying in the middle of the day.
Within an hour of that prayer I found the second line spacing error in the 3rd observation which was 71. I then had 71/70.5=1 and 114/70.5=Phi and (114+71)/70.5=Phi^2. The four best results of the 2/3rds rule had remainders that form the sides of the Kepler Triangle. Mathew 7:7. JR
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.