Does the 1987 crash interval explain 1998, 2000, 2002, 2007 and 2009 price extremes? And 2014?

This rabbit hole runs deep and I do not know where it ends as might be suggested in the title.

Let’s explore the elegance of the 1987 crash decline.  The 1987 high was 337, which is the 68^th prime number.  216 is the 3^rd square of the Pentagonal interval (3X72) of the circle.  And the difference the 1987 high and low is 121, the square of 11 and often cited for its religious significance:

1998 was cited by Bradley Cowan as the beginning of the current 17-year Pentagonal Uranus cycle and sported a significant decline that began on 9/1/1998.  The 121 price interval relates the high and low of that decline to the 1987 top (and bottom for that matter), within relatively small tolerances (I called them “fudge”):

Moving forward, how about the high and low of the decline of 2000/2002?  The high of 2000 is perfectly related to the high of 1987 by 10 squares of 121 (and therefore the low of 1987 would be 11 squares):

But the low of 2002 was off by 66.45 from being squared with 1987 by the 121 price interval.  If you take the interval of 121 divided by 66 you get 1.827 which I’d like to relate to a Sacred Number but just can’t.  I’ll leave that number as unresolved though I believe there’s an answer to this remainder because I find answers to similar remainders for 2007 and 2009.

The 2007/2009 was a similar question mark with remainders but they had a happy ending.  The high of 2007 is 10 squares of 121 greater than the 1987 high with a remainder of 23.90.  The 121 price interval divided by 23.90 is 5.08, close enough to the square of the hypotenuse of a 2X1 rectangle:

Similarly, there is a remainder associated with 2009 of 86.04.  The rabbit hole gets deeper.  The 1987 price interval divided by the 2009 remainder is the sqrt(2) or the hypotenuse of the 1X1 square.  AND the 2009 remainder divided by the 2007 remainder resembles the 360 degrees of the circle.  Exactly.  Not just close but exactly 3.6000000…..

What does all this suggest about the 2014 top (presumptuous but I’m all numerically bigoted bear) and 2016 bottom (roughly the end of Bradley Cowan’s 17-year Pentagonal cycle).  It suggests to me 2014 and 2016 extreme price high and low will have some relation to the 1987 high and low price.  

From a practical standpoint and pending further inquiry, what would be logical ending prices ignoring the possibility of remainders and given that SPX is already at the 1885 level?

Since we're daydreaming, what would be the final price high if it were 3 X the 2009 low?  3 X 666.79 = 2000.

Just suggestions and nothing more.

Jim