NDX, Cycle of 8, 2000 and 2014

Piddling around with planetary lines today, I noticed the 2000 Nasdaq 100 rocket from February 2000 to March 24, 2000 occurred between falling planetary lines.  That was a 25% in about 40 calendar days.    Of course, that blowoff was followed by a 40% decline in 60 days.  “dot.com”.  Here’s the big picture of 2000 through 2014.  

Note how price in 2000 seems to nicely ‘fit’ between gaps in planetary lines.  What’s happening to the COE lines is that planets are transiting from Pisces to Aires…from 360* of longitude to 0*.  Here's a table of those transits:

Drill down on the 2000 price spike with a daily chart of the Cycle of 8 (COE) planetary lines with some comments about the planetary players that dropped from 360* to 0 between February 11, 2000 and April 13, 2000:  

Here’s an amateur’s rationalization of what happened.  Initially, Mars dropped the COE line on February 11, 2000, a Saturday, which shifted all planetary lines down 360 points.  NDX bottomed very slightly lower on February 15 and bounced off the next higher planetary line that had dropped from 360* above.  That bottoming ‘produced’ the first acceleration of price higher.

Then Sun dropped from 360 to 0 on the Spring Equinox.  Price dropped precipitously on March 21 to the next higher COE planetary line but bottomed on exactly that next higher COE planetary line.  When bottomed, price was propelled to the final stop on March 24, 2000 where it almost met the COE planetary line another 360* further up.

To take further liberties with this explanation, perhaps the weight of Mars and the Sun in the COE averages had been lifted and price accelerated upwards without the ‘weight.’  But perhaps that left a great void below…some 720* and two planetary lines below.   On April 7 Venus and on April 13, Venus and Mercury, respectively, brought the COE average down by 2 more planetary lines.  Price, should it want to revert to the same planetary average that was present in February 2000, then it would have to drop 4 planetary lines from the February 2000 level.  Reversion to a mean?

As can be seen from the daily chart, price bottomed in May, 3 planetary lines below its level in February 2000.  I’m going to guess that as four price levels of 360* were ‘lost’ as the four planets moved from 360* to 0* as cited, the averages were being increased by natural longitude increases of all eight planets.  I won’t try to ‘reconcile’ things further and that might or might not be true.   

Moving on to 2014.  With all the talk about tops and such, perhaps there might be some similar shakeups in the COE longitudes that might be comparable to 2000.  Refer back to the table of transits above.

I’m going to trick you here.  I’ve decreashed the distance between planetary lines from 360* as in 2000 to 180*.  After all, that was dot.com times and we’re in rational times now.  Here’s a daily chart of 2014.

Sun dropped from 360* to 0* on March 20 and price, somewhat promptly, topped March 21 and dropped roughly 180* (from 3717 to 3543). 

I’d suspect the decreased ‘weight’ of the Sun might prompt a rally in NDX to the next up planetary line in mid April.  That would be the current (yesterday’s level) of about 3665 on the chart plus 180 to 3848.  And then, as you see from the table, you might expect a price decrease of maybe 2 planetary lines.

Lot’s of other stuff going on in planets (I think) and this is just one influence.  File it in ‘Imagination.’…or in 'delusion.'

[For disclosure purposes, NDX was down 42 points when I posted this in the morning and it hit a low down 55 points at about 2pm.  I'm 'judging' this drop as a reaction to the previous 4 days of price increases and transient.]

Jim