All WMOT pivots for January 16, 2018

I had a busy day yesterday, actually working for a client and did not follow the pivots that occurred during the trading day.  Most interesting to me was the first pivot of the day because it might answer questions about 'gaming' them with a simple set of trading rules.  I've not studied that dollar weighted outcome and am likely not to do so because that effort has led to yet another thread of more promising research.

I do feel compelled to follow the simple case; whether the WD Gann "Weekly Map of Time" (WMOT) predicted dates and times seemingly predict discernible pivots in the market.  Its the simple 'yes / no' evaluation of outcomes.

There were five predicted trading hour pivots yesterday, inclusive of the previously discussed 11:08am pivot:

1 

2

3

4

 5

Each of the above was within 1 four minute bar of a discernible pivot.  If you click on the 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, you should get a drilled down 4-minute chart which shows the location of the predicted pivot relative to the actual pivot.   I haven't broken it down to a one-minute chart to see if the one-bar 'errors' translate into as much as an error of 7 minutes or as little as 1 minute.

It's cluttered and therefore confusing, but here's the 4-minute chart for yesterday, including all of today's predicted pivots, going back to the last predicted pivot shortly before Friday's close:

Phi squared X 10000 is only 50 points from the close.  I prefer that number plus 386 points or 26565. The good old days, pick a number out of the hat.

 *** ***

The WMOT is simple to create.  Take the MOT that is available for free download (I don't even get a 'click' compensation for it) and "appoint" or substitute 20 seconds for each line on the MOT in lieu of 2 days.  But beware, the MOT is based on the annual cycle of the Sun (365.242 days per year) where the WMOT is based on 24 hours in a day, the Earth's daily cycle.  There will be 441 lines "left over" which means the pivots for every week will change.  (You'll also be confronted with the contradiction that I have taken too lightly; that time is not based exclusively on the rotation of the Earth but also influenced by the orbit around the Sun.  Predominantly the Earth, secondarily the Sun and thirdly, the Moon.)

Then, you'll need to identify every acrostic/ telestic instance of the vertically contiguous letters "PI" and "IP" to find every expected pivot for the week.  

Then you'll need to figure out the "perfect" or correct beginning.  Well, you can reverse engineer the time on each line based on snapshots of my WMOT to correlate your chart with mine.  That will give you the correct correlation without knowing WD Gann's "correct beginning" which I believe I know and have coincidentally published in this blog dozens of times.

Bottom line, you can derive the WMOT, but will you have the 'operating manual' of how to use it?  

Wandering a couple days ago, I observed that, despite my extensive research over a decade, I have not found a single "Gann expert" that can use the device WD Gann is mythologically reputed to have carried with him as he walked the NYSE; the Sq of Nine.  Nor his other thought to be sophisticated devices.  Some, apparently having thrown in the towel, write the Sq of 9 off as simply a "square number generator" and ignore the obvious circle that is often seen around the square.  Or even considering the nature of the triangle that operates over the circle and square; is it a Pythagorean 345, an isosceles, a right triangle, a Kepler triangle?  Some relate it to astrology, an excellent starting point but, in my opinion, still "lacking something."

But the point is not that there are varying degrees of dismissal of these supposed devices or apparent components of their operation.  The point is there isn't an instructional manual to show how they operate.  We know some or all of Mr. Gann's timepieces work to some degree, but we don't know how he worked them.  We know his 92% accuracy record came from somewhere, his impossible record of trades in 25 days, the incredible prophecies of events that I've documented in this blog (WWII, the Great Depression bottom, 9/11, me)...  he knew something but didn't leave instruction manuals to his timepieces.  He did what statistical experts in randomness say is "impossible."  Things to those of us (me) unable to understand must consider magic or miraculous.

Or did he leave at least one instruction manual?

That's the "thread of more promising research."  I have found seven artifacts of the instruction manual  I believe is encoded in the acrostic/telestic coding of the MOT.  The first is a mathematic test of the WMOT as I have calibrated it.  It proves my rendition of the WMOT, which spans almost 20 years from the "correct beginning," is mathematically conclusively off 20 seconds (which I can and will correct).  

The other six artifacts have only been partially decoded but one strongly points to "Clement's number."  Thus, I have concluded, "vibration" according to the "Periodic Table of Vibration" is a component of the method explained in the encoded instruction manual.  I don't have the instruction manual as yet and might not ever have it, but the riddles that frame the answer, the instruction manual, are there to be had.  In my opinion, of course.

Other than the one artifact of seven I've decoded, understood and proven mathematically, there is one  message that is mathematically clear; "keep secret."  And I recall, Robert Gordon, though he shared many inventions with Edna and Walter, he kept one secret, even from them.

Maybe Mr. Gann intends (intended) on sharing that secret with me and I am to keep it secret from anyone else.  Or maybe, he is to keep it forever secret it to himself.  Regardless, I take it seriously and believe to go further in this inquiry may have risk which I cannot foresee; that I could stupidly give something away without knowing it.

I feel, so often, like the second grader who has the answer, wildly waving my hand to get the teacher's attention.  Sometimes, if I'm called on at all, I'm proudly right, sometimes ashamedly wrong (mostly the latter in this blog).  I don't know if or when I find some thought to be a profundity, I will feel compelled to blurt it out in a post.  But I've got to stop or risk giving up what Mr. Gann thought, in his sage judgement, must be kept secret.  I take that seriously where others would consider my caution delusional.  As it may be.

If I ever decode the instruction manual and have reliable predictions of the curve for the future, I will share the predictions.

Thank you for considering,

Jim Ross