Diary note; the "Torah path," the "AMOT" and the "WMOT"

Just to keep track of my frustration or progress or both.  Dozens of hours decoding the perceived "instruction manual" of the WD Gann "Map of Time."  The instruction manual expands via Mr. Gann's "Torah Code" from all too obvious words I've located;  'sum' and 'add' and the permutations of those letters (dda, dad, mus, and ums, etc.).  I have found four instances of the exact word, 'add' and three instances of 'sum' in the acrostic telestic level of code.  Like I say, they are too obvious, such as:

Believing I have the center of an an 'instruction' to the "Map of Time" I take each acrostic or telestic letter and follow what I now call a "Torah path."  Here's how the Torah Path works.

Let's say I want to analyze the letter 'y,' (see the bold border in the above insert) which does not seem to fit with any of the contiguous acrostic letters shown above (both as a word and as a word that has meaningful context).  I first read ascending chapter line number 465 (in yellow highlight)  and go to that line number appearing in the descending chapter line number column:

I try to construct words of the 2 acrostic/telestic (a/t) letters on that line and the 4 a/t letters in the preceding and following lines (those a/t letters are "contiguous").  Very often, an expected word appropriate to a phrase falls right out.  In green you see the descending chapter line number and also in green you see the letter 'W.'  I've now imagined, particularly in the important context of the words heretofore I'd discovered, the letter 'W' and 'y' suggesting to me the word, "Why."  

The next branch.  I'm now biased to find the missing 'h.'  I look to the yellow highlighted ascending cumulative line number 8872 and go to that number in the descending cumulative line number column.  I don't find the missing 'h.'  I'll pass on providing the screenshot.

On descending line number 8872 on which I am now focused, I can find a new ascending chapter line number.  I go to it and do not find the 'h.'  I'll pass on providing the screenshot.

That's three branches so far.  There are two more branches.

Go back to the very first insert above and you'll see the yellow highlighted descending cumulative line number, 9244.  It will provide those two additional branches; we can go to descending cumulative line 9244 search the a/t letters for the missing 'h' on that line, the one above and the one below.

On line 9244, highlighted in yellow, the 'h' pops right out.

The final branch would be to follow the ascending green chapter line number to its corresponding chapter line number, in that chapter only, and look for the 'h.'  I'll pass on providing the screenshot.

*** ***

We are talking incomprehensible hours if one were to want to decode WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and its "Map of Time."  But we aren't.  Maybe the MOT has a fate that's decodable for every individual based on the vibration of their individual intuition.  I don't think so, but I hardly rule it out as being a function of the actual Torah Code found in the Torah.  

But the focus here is limited; its the painfully obvious word "add" that appears so conspicuously four times in plain, but un-"observed," sight.  The focus is decoding the "instruction manual" and therefore there must be a mathematic reasoning context.  After having decoded several words previous to the word, "add," the context was "we did this and that with number in the MOT and the result is a startling numeric answer."  The next word is "why?"  What is the natural law that gives rise to the startling result?  "Why" was a perfectly logical fit with the previously decoded words and their theme.

Sure, there were plenty of words that can be constructed with one root letter, like 'y' from five branches.  But they won't fit, logically, the context.  From a practical viewpoint, there aren't as many words as I'd have thought in the vast majority of words I've decoded so far.  It hard for me to fathom that not only did WD Gann bury the word to be found, but anticipated the others that might have been found and took steps to prevent their occurring.  I can't imagine the time that might have taken.

Already I've been "instructed" its not a "Map of Time."  Rather there are two maps.  There is an "Annual Map of Time" spanning 168 years, which heretofore has been referred to as the "MOT" and it is solar time based.  Now its the "AMOT."  365.242 days in a year.  And there is a "Weekly Map of Time" or "WMOT" that spans 168 hours and is terrestrial based.  24 hours in a day.

And there's a huge difference; they aren't additive-ly compatible in a year's "time."  They are one solar degree if you get my, err Mr. Gann's, meaning.  That pesky extra one degree in a day making it 361 degrees rather than 360.  Judging repeating history "kinda depends" doesn't it, on whether you're talking solar or terrestrial time.  

What its the biggest problem in reckoning time; which 'time,' solar or terrestrial, is it?  Orrrrr, is it an 'either or' proposition at all?  If history repeats, which time is it or is it only when the two times agree?  When the two have a sympathetic 'vibration?'  "Conjunction" would seem appropriate but not formulaically the same as in astrology.

Just an observation.  If I wanted to know when the first day of a given year and that first day of the week and that first hour, minute and second reoccurs, how many years will it take for that first day to be the same day of week, same hour and same minute?  According to the AMOT versus the WMOT, it'll take 42 years, but one will be am and the other pm.  To dot that last 'i' making them both a.m. takes 84 years.  I need to review my math, but that seems to be how it works out.  How interesting, 42 years, 84 years, nice mathematic subdivisions of the 168-year MOT.  And nice subdivisions of the 2520-year Biblical Great Week of prophecy.  2520, the smallest number into which every digit can be divided and produce a whole number.  

So far, maybe a hundred hours and I've completely, as best I can judge, decoded three of the 'add's' and one of the 'sum's.'  They make logical instructions, which I have not implemented as yet.  I understand why Mr. Gann stated that Robert Gordon worked day and night to understand and to invent so that he could save the world.  I'm not so sure it was just to save the world.  When I stop working in a day, there isn't a chance I won't lay there in bed and continue to think about it; the daily emerging puzzles and enigmas.  Yeah, its work.  But its enjoyable, peaceful, purposeful, intriguing work.

Jim Ross