Errata 3 corrections and a previously omitted third prediction

Would an observer say "There goes Jim, wrong again?"  I prefer to say I'm learning as an increasing function of my errors and their gravity.  While I modified my strident prediction #1 of only two days ago, I'll make a correction and triple down with a third prediction.  When wrong, I am compelled to figure out why, to explain... not to re-write or rationalize the already written record.

For the expedient:

1) The highest high of DJIA will have occurred when it prints a high equal to the "true theoretic equatorial circumference" of Earth plus 386 points (the top intraday price on September 3, 1929).  The high, thought to have occurred at 1:28pm January 8, will be the highest and final high of the 2009, 1932 and 1896 bull markets, never to be exceeded again,

2) a secondary high will be reached on Friday, July 13, 2018 very close to if not touching 24861, and

3) a "wave 1" crash will occur on about February 22, 2018.

Obviously, I've changed the first prediction and added nuance to the second.  I've added a third prediction; the third prediction is an 'omission' from the previous essays because it is based on subjective logic, not, as yet, on mathematic logic.

*** ***

I invited error when I declared Friday, January 5, 2018 as "the" high based upon a "true theoretic" time measured equatorial circumference of earth.  I should have said "the" high will occur when DJIA prints an intraday that is the "true theoretic equatorial circumference of earth" plus the intraday high of 386 on the previous great market top, September 3, 1929.  Like the lemming jumping off the cliff seen, so often on CNBC when I used to watch it, I was caught in the moment of Friday's rocket high.  

Yesterday's, January 8, intraday high printed at 1:28pm at 25312 (rounded, actually 25311.99) implying an equatorial circumference of 24926.  That's 25 miles greater than the instrument measured value calculated by Eratosthenes of Cyrene more than 2200 years ago and presently the consensus measurement at 24901.  In contrast, if the second of the two predictions occurs, WD Gann's laboratory of mathematic natural law, namely the DJIA, will have proven the both the Biblical law of historic repetition and the "true equatorial circumference" of Earth.  His mathematics, as I repeatedly misapply it, is based on those two properties of Earth; its circumference and the time it creates measuring the "spacetime" between repeating events.

[Attractive thought to contemplate; what if the circumference of the circle that defines time is 25200 rather than 24901?  The circle of time, the equator of the earth at which time is measured, being the same number as the Biblical Great Week X 10.  The same number as John Dee's philosopher stone number 252 X 1000.  That would put the final DJIA at 25200 + 386 or 25586 if that speculation is correct and my perception of the math is correct.]

The first prediction is based on, space, the unknown true theoretic equatorial circumference of Earth.  It is based on spacial displacement.  It is now contingent on that high intraday print which remains pending; maybe it was yesterday, maybe today as the close yesterday was within striking distance and /YM prints 25300 as I write.  If I'm right, we're very close to the end.  If DJIA rockets from here beyond the very near future, the Warren Buffet fundamentalists and others predicting the reduction in taxes and regulations will cause a continued great market rally will be right and the math I believe is rediscovered will be wrong.  If it continues to rocket, then the 50% or so of the mixed bag of technical analysts will be right and 50% or so wrong... and I will be wrong.

The second prediction, the July 13, 2018 secondary high, is based on time created by the motion of Earth at its equator, the creator of time.  Pi X 10000 days from July 8, 1932.  The related price top, which does not determine the date, is based on the true polar circumference of the earth plus the starting point of the price of 40 at July 8, 1932, again, the price is yet to be determined because the true theoretic polar circumference (measured by time) of Earth is unknown.  24861 should be close to  the secondary top as I expect currently measured polar circumference of 24821 is pretty close.

Those two elements, space and time, are reconciled by the mathematic vibration (86 according to Luo Clement/WD Gann methodology) of the subject, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, and cross prove themselves in the manifestation of the second prediction.  If the second prediction becomes true, then WD Gann's mathematics of spacetime is proven and history is proven to repeat - mathematically.  

The third prediction, not confirmed by or derived from mathematics, is that of a minor "wave 1" crash  (Elliott Waves would probably say a minor wave 3 of a larger wave 1) occurring on February 22, 2018.  The "wave 1" crash counterpart, as best I can determine, in 1929 would be:

Over the weekend from, Friday October 18, 1929 to Monday October 21, 1929, DJIA gapped down and went on to lose 9.24% (top on October 18 of 343, bottom of 314 on October 21).  

The third prediction is subjective, not based on mathematics that I understand.  It is derived from three 'clues' and, if you follow my work, you know I've been deluded by perceived clues.  That said, here are the clues.

First, the WD Gann "Map of Time" counterpart of October 19, 1929 is February 22, 2018.  In red highlight on the right side of the MOT is February 22 and the left counterpart is October 19:

Second, you'll see in green highlight the letters c, r, s, and a, tempting us to think of the word "crash" without the 'h.'  The chorus of randomists scream "coincidence."  But, as I've documented time and again in these pages, the math proves the intent of WD Gann.  He planted the math in the "single deep" path.  We will find the "h" according to the line path in blue.  Trace the descending cumulative line number 15036 to its counterpart cumulative ascending line number 15036... and you will find the 'h:'

  

Third, and this is 'out there,' the explanation is me.  How did Mr. Gann find me?  My birth date and a very in-depth understanding of my name according to the "Periodic Table of Vibration."  It is a far deeper understanding of my vibration than found in the Periodic Table and how my vibration is created and reflective of my life playing out in time.  He found my life was inextricably intertwined with the DJIA and when he did he created "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  He encoded my name into TTTTA dozens of times and related it to encoded messages and my birth date and the encoded word, "fate," as proof.  I've provided only a few of the many I have found.  "The Tunnel Thru the Air" is his method or his destiny to facilitate or manifest my destiny to figure out, painfully, a small fraction of what he knew and what ancients knew before him.

Delusional, narcissistic?  Without having proved these things to myself, I'd say just that.  So here's a very minor proof it is about me as finder.  Look at the two inserts above.  In the first, look at the tan acrostic letter 'm' and the tan telestic letter 'e.'  It spells 'me.'  And look on that line and see the tan highlighted date, February 21.  That is my birth date (excluding year).  Now look at the second insert and the tan highlighted date, February 21.  Coincidence or intended.  I'd submit a statistician would have to suspend belief in his life's work to claim it the former.

He saw through time and he found me.  His fate, my fate.  Not a big thing, it just is.

This journey of the last three or so years has been its own reward.  In contrast to the myriad of analysts and methodologies out there charging handsomely for their 'great knowledge,' I can look back and say I've studied the best of them, paid for their greatest supposed knowledge and know that not one of them has any more than a hint of the truth, an edge in the market.  The truth is, time and space, more accurately, spacetime is perfectly determined, "appointed."  I might or might not have the mathematic method of unraveling spacetime correct as yet (maybe we get a glimpse July 13, 2018 or so).  But I know its truth.  I can't prove it to you; only you can do that by doubting my work, testing it, testing Mr. Gann's work....   

Of the whopping 85 that read the last essay to this moment, I'll guess 53 read in the hopes of achieving transient wealth, 30 because they think something magical is going on, and 2 because they want to prove or disprove something to themselves.

Spacetime is not trend in otherwise random numbers; a contradiction in itself that statisticians labor to 'explain.'  

It is our appointment, your appointment, my appointment.  Purpose, cause and effect.  Destiny, fate.  Determination.

It is predictable and I know this because Mr. Gann proved it to me.

If the market continues going up, then I'm wrong and the fundamental analysts and 50% of the technical analysts are right.  Please accept this as acknowledgement without a mea culpa.

Unless I see another egregious error, this is the last Errata correcting my predictions and my last prediction.  The substance of Mr. Gann's mathematic methods, if proven true in coming months, are in the previous essays. The mathematics are far enough along, though not perfect, that to go farther would not help anyone discover anything of true value they could not obtain through effort.

Jim Ross