January 12, 2018 at 12:21pm, DJIA 25586

[This essay has a fundamental error of 1 minute.  The WMOT says the turn will occur at 12:20pm, not 12:21pm.  The pivot that was predicted for January 11, 2018 and did occur, was predicted for 12:21pm and today's, January 12, 2018, is predicted for 12:20pm.  Given that the WMOT is still in the process of being calibrated from its 'beginning point' decades in arrears, the difference of 1 minute doesn't bother me.   But making the error, if it is one (my calibration might be wrong making 12:21pm today correct), and not acknowledging it does bother me.]

Laying in bed last, crunching numbers, playing scenarios in my mind, it became only logical to envision, to connect the dots, that we might see January 12, 2018 at 12:21pm, DJIA 25586 today.

Only connecting the dots, not proven by math in any way, but it seems to make sense.  Now after I write this, I check /YM (DJIA futures) and overnight DJIA futures hit 25674 and remains up 95 at 25653 making the confluence of time and price at their conjoined point, the subject of this notation, less likely.

"Less likely?"  If someone walked up to you and said DJIA will be XXXXX at 12:21pm tomorrow, how likely would that be?  Absurdly improbable.

If someone walked up to you and said DJIA would be XXXXX at 12:21pm 91 years and 91 days from now....  Absurdly, absurdly improbable.

I'm not so sure the immense unlikelihood of either proposition is appreciably different....they're both out of the realm of computable 'scientific' statistical improbability.  Yeah, the former is less improbable, but is the difference noticeable?

What set me off on this philosophic rant this morning?  My Luo Clement vibratory "number."

After wringing out the huge number of numerical synchronicities in the immediately previous essay, I'd missed one.  The two-digit reflection my birthday and today's predicted time.

Recall in yesterday's essay I reduced my birthday (21) and first name (12) to 3 and 3.  But I did not connect the dots to the predicted time; 12:21pm.

My number  21    12

           Time  12     21

How improbable is that?

I'm reminded of an encoded "message" in WD Gann's "Map of Time" that, like many, seem too personal or not elaborated enough, I've not published it.  It said, to the effect, "We saw Dee map."  And I realize, that if the message is a message, he was referring to John Dee's "23rd theorem" (from page 18 of Jim Egan's "The Meaning of the Monas Hierophyphica..."):

I've not figured out the "Map," its so steeped in deep enigma of numerology.  But I haven't any doubt the diagonally crossed lines that divide "Metamorphosis" and "Consummation" are a reflection or exchange of the positions of opposites.  If the message is valid, which doesn't matter a bit because it caused me to ponder the subject of what it was teasing, then it has me contemplating another source (other than the Bible, Great Pyramid) of the "Map of Time."

Now focus on those diagonally crossed lines.  And, at the same time, connect the 21 of "my number" and the 21 of "time."  And then cross the 12s.

*** ***

I have a hunch its an ancient lesson in something I've learned from the earliest days of this blog; that opposites are polar extremes of the themselves, always exchanging positions.  John Dee had a great fascination with the "camera obscura" a great invention of his time in which he had a hand.  The camera; he built many models of it.

And the camera relies on light, manipulated through a small hole into a dark cavity, inverts the image in every respect; top to bottom, left to right.  

Space, reality, imaged through a small hole appearing on the reflective other side, becoming the polar opposite but its recognizable reflection.  Move the reflective wall closer to the small hole and the reflection becomes smaller and the reverse it true.  Tilt it one way or the other and the image of the historic event becomes distorted.  Do historic events work the same way, with the repetition becoming larger or smaller, distorted based on the time distance from the 'small hole' through which the original image must pass and the tilt of the reflective plane?

Yeah, I believe that's how all this works and it would seem John Dee had the numeric mechanics of it buried in his map just as WD Gann buried the same knowledge in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  But its buried deeply in layers of 'in sight' and further derived enigma.

Let's see what 12:21pm produces.  If nothing else, it renews thought of reflective opposites (camera obscura) and numeric opposites (the exchange of 12-21 and 21-12); the numeric laws of time and space.  

Law, not magic.

Jim Ross