The source of Robert Gordon's knowledge

Its the Bible.  Adjacent the "six e's" that called my attention to the encoding of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and in the Foreword, you find the 3 objectives of a good book:

WD Gann, in his "The Tunnel Thru the Air" tells us, time and again, that its hero and his proxy, Robert Gordon's source of prophecy, knowledge and inspiration is the Bible.  If you search TTTTA for the exact words "study of the Bible" you will find it exactly three times.  If you abbreviate that phrase to the exact words "study the Bible" you will find it exactly three times.  3-3.

As you recall, the Preface of TTTTA tells you to read the book 3 times and read the Bible 3 times.   3-3.

There's a pattern there.  TTTTA says, and I add my spin, "If you study the Bible (found 3 time), you will enjoy the fruits of your work resulting from your study of the Bible (found 3 times)."

The pattern can be generalized further; when you find the verbal convenience of a suspected truth, you will find mathematic proof of Mr. Gann's intention to impart that truth.  I encountered this pattern or modus operandi dozens of time in TTTTA.  Something I suspected to have been intended, I could not believe.  And then I found mathematic evidence.  Examples:  The prophecy of 9/11/2001."  Tao to War" or the "Tao Device."  The prophecy of 9/11/2001.   The prophecy of me.

I found those amazing predictions among many others and did not believe them until I found the mathematic proof that he intended imparting those predictions.  They were each unbelievable prophecies made 88 years before I found them...until I found the math that put their intended creation beyond doubt.

Perhaps its me, but I didn't get a thing out of reading TTTTA the first time in about 1973/74.  And I still get little understanding out of reading the Bible without guidance.  How many times in cumulative now have I read TTTTA?  And while I have not resolved to sit down and read the Bible 3 times in a focused, compressed and thoughtful manner, how many times have I read it...given my sporadic attendance in church during my life and the many many times I've been forced to research Mr. Gann's citations and claims?

Can anyone, even with a tutor, read and understand TTTTA, and moreover the Bible?  You have to do it yourself....do the work yourself.  The tutor can assign you the work, but you have to do the work.

Once you suspect a truth spoken to you in your readings, can you trust your subjective reading of a truth?  Even if its from an author you consider to have that knowledge and wisdom?  What would confirm the truth?  Simple subjective testimony, be it spoken or written is untrustworthy.  Obviously three people witnessing an accident would like provide differing testimony to some degree.  Not perfect truth.  But if they witness the formula 2+2 they will each answer 4.

*** ***

Which brings me to this result; if it is said in TTTTA, then there will be mathematic proof of its intention to be said.  If Mr. Gann, via Robert Gordon, said some truth, then we should be able to find a mathematic path to arbitrate between competing ideas; to confirm or deny the truth perceived.  From page 77, [77, the number of years in WD Gann's life]:

So it says, math is the 1) only real science and 2) has furnished unmistakable proof of history repeating.

And we have encoded, though a subjective word itself, the perfectly vertically contiguous letters highlighted in blue that spell the word "repeats."

The encoded word proves to us Mr. Gann intended the thought that history repeats.  It proves his intention, but it does not prove the thought itself.

In the previous and following pages of TTTTA, Mr. Gann provides examples that history repeats.  But they constitute only a subjective argument.  They are not, themselves, mathematic proof.

Ultimately, there must be mathematic proof the thought, the truth, that has been offered.

Maybe that will occur on or about July 12, 2018.  Or maybe it will be another error.  As admitted before, if it is the the immersible probable latter, it will not be, in my best judgement, an error of WD Gann.

What's the source of Robert Gordon's knowledge?  Is it the perfect math, is it the Bible as the repository of and testimony to the perfect God, or is it the perfect math of the perfect God?

Or have I confused the simple three-word answer I recounted on the first line of this essay?

Jim Ross