Months ago, standing at Mr. Gann's gravestone and looking towards Manhattan (obscured by the "Great Tree") I imagined a triangle formed by three geographic points I also imagined to be important to Mr. Gann; Green-Wood Cemetery, arguably the location of the first formal battle of the Revolutionary War, the Statue of Liberty, a monument to the birth of the nation, and 42nd and Broadway, the heart of New York City to many. Of those locations, there is a triangle of time and space having properties that involve the numbers phi, pi and exponent e. I called this triangle the WD Gann Memorial Triangle and later WD Gann's Gravestone Geometry. I believe, but have not derived, that a fourth point might be mathematically derived from those three points in space/time; the space/time point of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.
If there is such a derivation, I would expect artifacts of phi, pi and exponent e to be found in TTTTA which are aspects of time and space. So, let's consider some metrics of the time and space structure of TTTTA:
Consider first 24901 miles and 15341 lines, the division of which gives us 1.623. Close to phi but unsatisfying.
Now consider 9579 days and lines, the division of which gives us 1.602. Very close to an early iteration of phi, namely 8 / 5 = 1.600. But again, not compelling.
But chew on this. The simple average of 1.623 and 1.602 is 1.613. The structure of TTTTA as enumerated in the MOT is 5 thousandths from theoretic phi.
Now cut a corner by factoring out the common factor of 15341:
It would appear that where the simple average of phi was short of theoretic phi by 5/1000, the error has increased as a result of the mathematic shortcut that approximates phi squared. It would also seem that, just as the Fibonacci series iterates closer and closer to theoretic phi as larger consecutive numbers in the series are used, perhaps time/space similarly approaches phi squared the larger the component numbers become.
What's certain to me is that WD Gann had an intimate understanding of phi....and its interrelationship between time and space. And he left it in many places.
And only those who seek will find.
Jim Ross
Jim, That's not really the duration of the book, that is from Roberts birthday. That said, why just look at the very first bible quote in TTTTA. It is on p3.. 9 is a good number, try also the first quote on p54.
ReplyDeleteAfter posting, I had the similar thought that an earlier date than Robert's birthday of 6-9-1906 would be the date his older brother passed in the SF earthquake is, by implication, an earlier date; 4-18-1906. We might argue that the Foreword is part of the earlier dating of the book but it is dated May 9, 1927 so I did discard that idea.
ReplyDeleteAre you saying that I should try to find the date the Bible verse on page 9 or page was created which would be B.C. Finding that date would be problematic I'd think as we aren't given dates in TTTTA and accurate dating of Bible verses aren't, generally, agreed upon. Can you give me the dates you think were intended?
I don't think that was Mr. Gann's intent and, rather, I do think it was his intent to demonstrate Phi in time and Phi in space. It dovetails with findings in the WD Gann Memorial Triangle its seems. When the numbers fall together rationally, I tend to "think" I have success in figuring things out.
Thanks for considering,
Jim
No not at all...the Ezekiel quote on p54 was simply "16:1 and 44"....ie 1618...maybe its just a coincidence (but I doubt it :))
ReplyDeleteNot following you. 16:1 + 44 = 1618? I don't doubt scripture verse numbers have intended math meaning but I've not figure which ones are intended to mean something at what time. And I don't understand why that means the duration of TTTTA is not as I've proposed; the earliest date and the last date.
ReplyDeleteNeed more coffee,
Jim
I was simply going back to your essay, where your friend suggested Gann never made mention of Phi. I countered that he did in his first bible quote and again on p54. I inferred nothing else.
ReplyDeleteOn duration, perhaps it is the wording. If you meant first date to last date (and not duration) then I agree.
When looking at numbers with regard to history, I would be careful of giving up 06-09-1906 as significant in your map. September 11, 2001 is a repeat of history from Isaiah 9:11.
ReplyDeleteThis is also shown in the Pentagon attack. Exactly 60 years before the attack on 911, builders broke ground in construction of the Pentagon. That was on 9-11-1941. These numbers
are not cooincidences and we still don't understand how they work. When I look at 06-09-1906 I see a number that can be read both backwards and forwards as the same number.
6091906 in reverse is 6091906.
Mr. Gann probably understood the significance of this better than we do.
Steve
69 is such a mystical number. Flip it over and then flip each of the numbers independently left to right and you get 96. If you flip both together instead of independently you get 69.
Delete69 is the key to relating the Battle of New York (that occurs in the 110 story Mammouth Building) to 9/11. 69 year and 69 days...from the proper date in 1932 gives you 9/11/2001. That's the 6th Prophecy.
I've written a ton of stuff on 69. I don't believe for a moment that WDG put 6/9/1932 in the first paragraph, placed Robert Gordon in his office at 69 Wall Street, placed the story of Jonas and "the only sign" discussion on page 69 without immense purpose and forethought.
I'm right where you are; "we still don't understand them" but they're something good and we need to hold to them.
Jim
No doubt gann knew about them. Some thinly veiled others divulging the perfect harmonics in our world. Ie natural law calculated within an error of <0.0001 of a perfect harmonic.
ReplyDelete