"...the trump of God..." Did WD Gann predict the Donald Trump presidential run?

I kid you not.  This morning I reviewed my previous post regarding "clews."  I had left out one of the most timely apparent spelling/usage errors I had located; "trump."  Here it is from the first printing of WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"

"....with the voice of the archangel and with the trump of God;...."  Perhaps, "trumpet?"

"Aha" I said.  We know Mr. Gann enjoyed evaluating and predicting presidential races.  We know he had mixed results.  Or his public record was mixed.  If Mr. Gann could perfectly predict the future, an assertion that would raise the hackles of the "randomites," would he "spread broadcast" that fact, much less the methods?  Let's look at a comment made by Renato P. Alghini in his preface to the 1980 second edition of WD Gann's "The Magic Word:"

Would one with such a secret be safe if he were known to have it?  Moreover, would the world be ready, in 1950, for those methods?  [Do note the curious asterisks and then compare them to the curious asterisks found on page 130 of TTTTA and on page 45 of Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers," an add occurrence I've discussed long ago in an essay found HERE.]

Did Mr. Gann predict Donald Trump?

SO, what's a researcher with an alleged Map of Time (MOT) with many levels of encoding derived from a book to do?  Look for acrostic/telestic messages confirming the prediction of Donald Trump.  We find the above apparent "trumpet" versus "trump" error on page 3 of TTTTA but I do not find any permutation of "Donald" anywhere near page 3.  Trump is found on line 188 of the MOT and the earliest instance of "don" won't be found until line 7013, page 182.  That is not confirmation that "trump" is an intended message.

The scripture is NOT incorrect although we would think it to be.  Mr. Gann is said to have used the King James version of the Bible.  If you compare the various versions of Thes. 4:16-18, most Bible versions spell the entire word, trumpet.  The King James version spells the word "trump."  Go to Biblehub and you can see all the versions and make that comparison.  

Even the "thought to be" misspelling isn't.  "Trump" is the correct word from the King James version of the Bible.  How might we infer Mr. Gann foresaw Donald Trump's presidential campaign?

When did Donald Trump announce his presidential run?  June 16, 2015.

What is the MOT date associated with the word "trump?"  June 13, 2015.

We find the line on which "trump" appears is associated with the date June 13, 2015 (blue highlight) whereas the proper date (highlighted in green) is off 3 days or 2 lines.

Nevertheless, what a coincidence the "randomites" must explain.  But, but, but, the MOT is off 3 days or two lines. 3 days off out of 9,579 days covered by the book (from June 6, 1906 to August 30, 1932).  2 lines out of 15340 lines in TTTTA.  Pretty close, but still not perfect.

So, if Mr. Gann intended to display his prediction and if his mathematic foresight is perfect, why the error, de minimis as it is?  Well, why might one presume my enumeration of the MOT is not off by 3 days or 2 lines for some reason I can't explain?  Is WD Gann right or is Jim Ross right?  I'm not betting against the master.

But the far more concerning issue, if you take this analysis as serious as I take it, is not the fact that such a prediction might be successfully made.  No, its the substance of the narrative contained in that paragraph on page 3.  

Jim Ross