Finding Rene Descartes and the Torah Code, the ultimate proof

Two coincidences had me down this road yesterday and this morning I added a third.  In WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air"  Rene Descartes' (pronounced "dakart") is spelled with a very tight formation of acrostic and telestic letters, lacking only an 'a,' on page 216:

The last name, highlighted in blue, can be recombined using only the letters 'rene' to spell the first name.  Lacking an easily encoded "a."

I'm off on this road today because first I had, over time, noticed a many occurrences of very suspicious sequential telestic letters "des" which I skeptically correlated with the mysterious cameo appearance of Dr. Descartes.  Briefly, Robert Gordon, weary from his works, took a trip to Paris to relax and had a health issue at a public convention.  Previously he had imagined he saw Marie Stanton and had passed to him a note written in some foreign language.  Dr. Descartes attended Robert's health issue and tried to help him have the note interpreted by finding an interpreter Dr. Descartes knew.  Each time, the interpreter rebuff the pair indicating an apparent repulsiveness of the note.  Dr. Descartes could not resolve Robert's dilemma but the Lady Beresford (who also has a real life counterpart) later explained the note as being something imagined and not something real.  Robert should have "doubted," a Descartesean philosophic method, the existence of the note and proved it first to himself.

Second, I was onto the mystery of Dr. Descartes'  because I'd long believed the ability to predict, being not alone a matter of time, was also dependent on knowing the "place."  As in the movie "Knowing," the key to WD Gann's "Map of Time" had to include a means by which to determine not only the time but the place. And for what do we remember Rene Descartes most prominently; Descartesean coordinates.  The ultimate place and where in as fine a granularity as your measurement instrument.  Geo-positioning technology uses GPS coordinates which were inspired by and commonly attributed to Rene Decartes.  Shortened, of course, to "Cartesian coordinates."

A third coincidence.  I found both Rene Desc_rtes and "tora" spelled proximately with a meaningful and relevant narrative message (above).  What I interpreted from being down this road was far beyond finding the means to predict the "place." I might be an inch closer to the math of the "place" but I'm a world deeper into the meaning of the previously noted "Tora Code."

Following the coincidences my amateur study of Rene Descarte  indicated that not only was Descarte a great geometer (as the study of the earth's spacial structure the genesis of the word "geometry"), but he was a great mathematician and intrigued with the great number, PHI.  And hardly least and perhaps greatest was his achievement in proving the most elemental component of philosophy:

When I say I'm "down the road," quite literally, I was down the road.  Armed with a link to the Youtube reading of Rene Descartes' "Meditations on First Philosophy" I traveled the seven hours to and then the seven hours back from a client's office listening twice to that masterful reading of that incredible essay.  Here are the "Cliff-notes" version of the first four of six meditations an amateur philosopher wannabe would humbly and imperfectly offer:

• To discover truth, we must first discard anything one believes, has been taught or understands and doubt every assertion.  And in the most elemental state of not knowing anything, the mere contemplation of doubt is evidence that "I am."  How can I NOT exist if I can doubt my existence.  
• That I think by doubting that "I am" is proof that "I am."  "I think, therefore, I am."  Nothing can deter one from this primal reality.  I continue to doubt my body, the objects around me and other other form of reality sensed, but I cannot doubt that "I think" and have being.
• That I have thought, from where did that thought come?  I would know if I thought it first.  It must come from something as great or greater; if we were to wish to create a stone then we must have at least the elements and mass necessary from which the stone might be formed.  The elements must be at least the same or greater than the stone to be created.  And, if I have a thought, then it must come from a source greater than me, from something more perfect than I; from God, the "first cause."
• That I make error is proof not of the imperfection of the "first cause" but that I am I am the lesser and, the recipient of an incomplete set of otherwise perfect thoughts.  That I am a mean between the complete and perfect God, 100% or 1, and the absence of anything or 0.  I have been given an incomplete set of thoughts and had withheld from me the remaining thoughts.  I err not because the perfect thoughts given me by God are in err for they come from perfection, but I err because I do not have all the thoughts of the "ALL."

The "Meditations" were delivered to the Sacred Faculty of Theology of the University of Paris in about 1641 and, in the dedication and preface, the meditations stated their intention of proving God from philosophy as a supplement to the proof by theology and scripture.  The latter, of course, being not considered proof by atheists.  Proof by reason stronger than geometry as Descartes claimed, of God.  That must have been music to the Catholic Church' ears having only years before destroyed Galileo Galilei over his life long teaching of heliocentrism. 

PAUSE.  A method of Philo of Alexandria in encoding meaning was to present the same text twice or more and create subtle differences in each version that the 'seeking' person would use as a clue to deeper meaning.  Galileo Galalei....  a difference of 'o' versus 'i.'  Just a thought but 'o' and 'i' are 6 and 9 according to Luo Clement.  Where was it that Robert Gordon had his office?  What was the date of his birth?  How many years and days in the 6th Prophecy passed between the last battle of the "Great War in the Air" and the fall of the World Trade Center?  69 years and 69 days.  Do you see that number in the first insert above?  69 Wall Street.

Back on track, two means of proving God; by theology and scripture and by philosophy from the most elemental.  That the atheists who doubt must be shown in logic greater than geometry that God exists and is the 'first cause.'  That's where Descartes' thread ends.  He proves, if you accept the logic, from nothing known, "the doubt," to the perfect and complete knowledge of God.

Can there be a third method of proving God?

*******

WD Gann promises to "one up" Rene Descartes, in my opinion that is.  Upon leaving the Meditations in the car, I considered all night why the trail to Descartes?  Could there be more than simply leading to the means of finding the "place" in the MOT to match the "time" some event is to occur; the place being encoded Descartesean coordinates?  That it is, I believe... and more.

Its the third proof of God encoded into TTTTA.  Where God is proven by theology and then by Descartes' philosophy, I believe it will have been found that WD Gann proved God by the mathematics of all things encoded in the Bible; the Torah Code.  How many times did Mr. Gann lament, in so many words, that people did not study the Bible to know all things, to know the future?  Many many times.  Check me on this for your satisfaction.  Try page 84 for just one of many.

Restated again, in my opinion, we will find that WD Gann encoded in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" the mathematic interpretation of the Bible.  He will have been found to have explained the Torah Code.  Its not something I know but believe will occur; but I am confident someone will.

And from there, the atheists who are too inattentive to follow either scriptural or philosophic proof (an assertion made by Descartes in the Preface to the Meditations)...they will be able to contemplate the mathematic proof and/or the results of the proof; prediction.

Obviously, I haven't that proof but I've seen the result; a subset of several predictions that have manifested and I have documented in essays. There are many more, I believe, in TTTTA.  But as if to throw me a bone and keep me in the hunt, Mr. Gann gives me... or us... something in the interim.  Refer back to the lengthy first excerpt above and you might not only perceive the one and only one relatively ordered and nearly complete spelling of "Rene Desc_rtes" highlighted in blue; you will also see highlighted in tan highlight, "tora."  The latter is the second of 10 spellings of "Tora," the seventh being fully articulated as "Torah Code," replete with two spellings of Isaac Newton's (who some say sought the Torah Code for half his career) last name:

   

For evidence of proof of the importance of a thought I always look at conspicuous numbers in related narrative.  How about that "9th to 13th verses" in the above excerpt?  13 / 9 = 1.444 or better recognized; 144, the square of 12.  Maybe.

More stunning, at least to me, is what is prominently missing from the spelling of Rene Desc_rte?  That missing "a," a very common letter that could easily have been encoded by Mr. Gann.  Meaning?  That letter 'a' or interpreted by Luo Clement's table of Pythagorean number equivalents as:

 '10' which may be reduced to '1,' the value of 'a,'  ' 100%.'  

'The 'ALL.'

Jim Ross

PS, My essays are seeming to be progressively more theologic and metaphysic which will fly in the face of the doubters.  During the last two years I've witnessed and written about predictions of events that cannot be made according to my understanding of statistics and numbers; miracles.  Many of them are in TTTTA and the "Map of Time" that one can prove and witness themselves.  Now having become a Christian through this research and in the "convinced" sense as opposed to the "church going" and scriptural sense, its near impossible, despite my pathologic mathematic doubting, to be other than what "I am."  If I never prove the math, I'm already satisfied.  

Post PS, Funny, that is if you can find something to chuckle at in Rene Descartes’ “Meditations on the First Philosophy,” Descartes lamented the professional doubters that would rejoin his philosophic proof with lame, pathetic exclamations and irrelevant protests.  People that promote their self importance not by reason but by vapid substance-less critique.  Something like “You've really lost it now” or “you and your loony readers.”  You know them.  I call them “Noxious Ones.”  I was one.