Synchronicity, Mark's bunker, an earthquake and 33666

Earthquake in the essay subject title gets a lot of 'hits.'  Sadly, that's true.  The less stock market oriented, the less sensational oriented, the less the appeal.  Unfortunately, earthquakes are largely not the direction of most of my essays so I don't get a lot of hits.  Not to worry, I'm not compensated for hits...this is simply what I like to do.  This essay is different because its a unique moment in which the "out in right field stuff" that I've been studying, WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and such, seems to be moving in the same direction of a more popular topic; earthquakes, volcanos and such.

Three interesting events this last week may create a synchronicity.

First, Mark Zuckerberg is building what many think is a bunker communal homestead in Palo Alto.  Yes, I know, he bought four houses that a developer had intended to acquire and build structures that could peek into his bedroom.  Living, as I understand, maybe a mile or so up the hill (about 56' above sea level) and above the bay, he's probably not so concerned about the water.  If something happened, he might, however, be concerned about those who survive a problem.  

Mark worry about earthquakes?  Surely not.  His Facebook recently occupied its new campus at about sea level on the San Francisco Bay.  Not worried as long as he has his hired guns and a bunker to which take refuge.

Second, there was a significant earthquake yesterday, a 4.5M off the coast near Eureka CA yesterday.    That's Cascadia subduction area.  It was predicted on May 24 in a video that the amateur earthquake sleuth Michael Janitch.

Michael rambles on a lot and the focus of this forecast is his newly discovered North Pole super volcano, but its there; he logically derives the general location that was just struck.  4.5 is not small for California.  The largest in over a year occurred on February 24, 2016, the date I'd incorrectly believed would be an earthquake of greater proportion.    

But Janitch' prediction is not the point.  Its the offshore earthquake itself.  If you check the timeline of the first Allied Enemy in the fictional war it was this.  Japan declared war in April 1930, the US Pacific Fleet was destroyed in an offshore battle (a date or range was not give) and Los Angeles was destroyed in the middle of May. 

Assume Japan declared war in the middle of April, 1930.  Could have happened anytime in April, but take the simple average.  Then we know Los Angeles was destroyed mid May so, again, May 15.  That's 30 days between one and the other.  From April 15 to May 15, its 30 days, an initial interval.

Now, Brownsville and El Paso are attacked on August 1, 1930 which is 108 days from April 15 and 78 days from May 15.  78 days divided by 30 days is 2.60 or roughly Phi^2.  

San Francisco was attacked in September, 1930.  If we assume the month's midpoint again, it would be September 15, 1930.  And that date is 45 days after the August 1, 1930 attack on Brownsville and El Paso.  Divided by the initial interval of 30 days and we have 1.50 or the early iteration of Phi as determined by the Fibonacci numbers 3 and 2.  

Now let's consider what may have taken place that may become repeated history.  On April 15, 2016 and thereabouts, there was a great earthquake in Japan with pre shocks and after shocks.  In the preceding an following days, very large earthquakes occurred in Vanuatu and Ecuador.  Following Janitch' thesis that earthquakes cause distant earthquakes and particularly around the Pacific Rim, it happened.  And further following his thesis that earthquakes will occur where they haven't; that pressure was relieved in Vanuatu and Ecuador but not in the U.S. Pacific Coast.  

Did Japan seismically declare was on the U.S. on April 15, 2016?  If so we have a point from which to measure.  Now, and here's the crucial question, was the 4.5M that occurred off the coast of Eureka CA the symbolic battle off the Pacific coast in TTTTA that preceded the destruction of Los Angeles by a matter of days?

Its interesting that Janitch claims his Facebook pages and those of his administrators are being blocked by Mark Zuckerberg's company, Facebook.  An event Janitch claims has occurred only with his having raised his level of alert concerning the Pacific Coast area.  

Third, and this is where we may find a synchronicity, in the thread to Revelation 33666.  This last week, a reader posted a comment to an essay on the encoded numbers 11, 77 and 88 the gist of which was this math:

The guest goes on to point out that the King James Bible long placed 33666 in the title of Revelation and, to the guests' knowledge, only the Bibest.org web location maintains that transition:

The guest's interpretation is that we live in "really important Biblical times."  And then he points to paragraph 6.16 which I expand to several paragraphs:

The kings, great men, rich men and captains.... hid themselves in the dens and rocks.  Seems I remember tin TTTTA he people of San Francisco and Los Angeles fled to the mountains.  Indeed so.

And we have this last week, seemingly, the "King" of Facebook building his bunker while exposing his workers to the remote but ominous possibility of destruction.  All's forgiven, the King has said he'll not destroy any trees when he builds his impenetrable, indestructible palace nor enlarge his carbon footprint.

*******

I've previously mentioned that my interest would be piqued with a significant California offshore event.  It might signal the beginning of events symbolically represented by the first campaign of the Allied Enemy and the second campaign, the greatest event of which would be Yellowstone.  

If we've had that offshore event, the following and ongoing events would seem to be an ill defined Phi progression of the initial interval of events.  The timeline is simply not well detailed in dates.

Is Mark Zuckerberg's bunker the "tell?"  The synchronicity that confirms the suspicion?

I don't know.  I've proven nothing in math.  These things have simply occurred this week and seem to match the war pattern that is, again seemingly, presented by Mr. Gann with a purpose not limited to the stock market portrayed as a war.

You'll know that I'm onto something if my blog essays suddenly disappear.  Or the next event following the offshore event in the timeline symbolically set forth by Mr. Gann occurs.

Jim Ross