The first enemy campaign part 2; the time line, "Tora, Tora, Tora"

Previously, the first campaign battle line of the fictional "Great War in the Air" appearing in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" was developed.  It consists of two lines both beginning at Brownsville TX in the south and Seattle in the north and which defines the front along the Pacific Coast and the secondary line through the the El Paso area:

This essay and the following one propose the "Great War in the Air" presents a timeline for the first enemy campaign that is pictured above.

The problem would be the already accepted use of the fictional "Great War" to symbolize the "war" in the stock market between 1930 and 1932.  After all, the bottom of the Great Depression's stock market was predicted in the final battle of Washington DC.  Could Mr. Gann have used the fictional war to predict the market's; many if not most people who study TTTTA seriously would agree.  Could the Great War serve two or even three purposes?

Proof that the same narrative story is used for, at least, two predictive purposes; the stock market as many analysts have documented and the generals of World War II.  Just one snippet of the former is the stock market bottom of the Great Depression, July 8, 1932, occurred within 1 trading day of the July 4, 1932 fictional battle of Washington, the last battle of the "Great War in the Air."  And the latter, the narrative of the Great War in the Air contains many of the generals and other characters of WWII.  Even the fictional Japanese commander General Nagato has his part in World War II; the command many say that was given by General Hirohito on December 7, 1941 was given from the bridge of the Japanese flag ship, the battleship class Nagato.  The command was said to have been "Tora, Tora, Tora."

Tora, Tora, Tora may have several meanings, but, for sure, it connotes for us surprise and destruction.

Another word of meaning discussed in previous essays, Tokyo J-1.  I stumbled on the Tokyo J-1 as the Japanese radio station J-1 that, like others, carries that earthquake prone country's "earthquake notification service" or "ens."   That same "ens" that appears next to my name at the tope of Chapter VII (name in red and 'ens' in yellow HERE).  So, IF Mr. Gann wants me to be an "earthquake notification service (in addition to the one operated by the USGS), then that's what I'll be.

Do you see where I am going and as suggested in other essays?  The "War in the Air" describes 1) a fictional war, 2) a war in the stock market as 'experts' agree, 3) World War II in many undeniable aspects (generals, characters, objects, locations)  and 4) heres the present proposition,  a seismic war in our time.  A description of the "where" that was covered by the first essay in this series and the timeline which will be covered in this essay and the next essay.

"Tora, Tora, Tora" the name of the movie and the reputed commence attack order given in the early morning of December 7, 1941 from the bridge of the Nagato.  Do we find "Tora" in the encoded acrostic and telestic messages of TTTTA?  Ten times in fact on the following enumerated lines of the WD Gann "Map of Time."  Following are links to each of 10 screenshots:

The message is surprise attack and destruction.  Do the messages give us a location?  We already have the map above that came from TTTTA.  So what does "Tora" tell us besides "surprise?" From the sixth instance of Tora above we have the following:

Okay, okay, the fictional Great War predicts both the 1932 stock market bottom and aspect of WWII, but does it describe a contemporary "seismic war?"  Let's use "Tora" #6 to tie some ideas together.

In the above insert, you can see the letters "Ta" in the acrostic column and "ra" in the telestic column both in red highlight.  In the first blue shaded narrative you have the battle lines that are drawn on the map in the first insert on this page.  It is, in my suspicion, a rough map of where seismic events will occur.  The red arrow points to my "great mistake," February 23 or 24, 2016.  In late January, early February I interpreted Mr. Gann's intent to warn there would be a great earth quake in San Francisco.  I was wrong and penned a 'mea culpa.'  But that date did have significance.  On that February 23 the lower 48 states did experience the largest earthquake in more than a year; a 4.9M that struck Wasco California (Wasco is roughly equidistant between San Francisco and Los Angeles).  February 23, 2016, approximately one month after the widely recognized "Jonas Storm of January 24 and 25, 2016.  It would seem, the Jonas Storm was a major earthquake near SF and LA, but is it, in turn a sign for a much larger event?

That second blue highlighted narrative above; perhaps there is a clue to timing there.  Japan declared war in April 1930, destroyed the U.S. Pacific fleet between that unspecified date in April and "middle of May" and destroyed Los Angeles in the middle of May.  As if to emphasize the adversary, Japan, that same word is encoded (light red highlight) with symmetry in the April 1930 declaration:

We have the adversary, the approximate declaration date, a first "skirmish" date when Japan destroyed the U.S. fleet off the coast of California and then the "middle of May" destruction of Los Angeles.  We may have a sign but maybe there would be another sign or signs.

When did Japan declare war on the U.S. in 2016?  Symbolically of course.

On April 15, 2016 at 16:26 UTC Japan suffered the largest of a series of earthquakes measured to be 7.0M and which followed a 6.2M foreshock by 4 hours.   

We can't pin Mr. Gann down on the date Japan "declared war" because he heads the declaration as "April 1930."  Are we to take it as the middle of April?  If yes, the April 15, 2016 Kumamoto quake was exactly what we might expect.

How is an earthquake in Japan a declaration of war on the U.S.?  Officially, seismic experts claim earthquakes are neither predictable nor does an earthquake in one area cause earthquakes in distant locations.  Seemingly in contrast to this finding, earthquakes "rippled" around the Pacifiic "Rim of Fire" following the 2016 Kumamoto quakes striking principally Guatemala, Vanuatu and Ecuador.  Vibration?  It would seem so but experts disagree regarding "distant event" causality.

Does the great Law of Vibration not apply to solids where it does apply to gases and liquids?  An amateur seismologist believes, contrary to the official line, earthquakes propagate outward from the initial event.  Michael Janitch has a running contest with professional and academic seismologists regarding his contention they are both predictable and cause "ripples" of earthquakes outward from the center along faults and volcano ranges.  Among Michael's pet predictive generalizations is one that says "if a deep Pacific Ocean earthquake strikes, there will be shortly thereafter, an earthquake on the coast of at least one magnitude greater (if its a 6.0M offshore, it will be a 7.0 on the coast)."

*******

A lot of things above to tie together.  The map is pretty easy to see, but is it really a map of seismic destruction that is nearing?  Is the April 1930 fictional declaration of war by Japan not only a stock market time marker and a WWII marker, but does it symbolically describe the deadly April 15, 2016 Kumamoto Japan earthquake?

If so, might there be a second Jonas sign, the first being the January 2016 Jonas Storm that preceded the predicted February 24, 2016 earthquake in Wasco CA?  Do you see it in the chronology?

• Japan declares war April 1930 and the Japan is struck by a quake that ripples around the Pacific Rim of Fire.  

• Shortly after declaring war, Japan destroys the Pacific Fleet off the California coast.  Might this be the second Jonas sign?  Might there be a deep Pacific Ocean earthquake that is a sign for a greater coastal earthquake.

Will an offshore quake be a sign of a much greater quake on shore, an assertion of vibration by Michael Janitch?  Does Michael Janitch have any gravitas in the WD Gann world?  Is he a player?  You'll find his last name in red and first name in green below:

I reproduced a large portion of that page.  The narratives seem very relevant.

Next up, I'll struggle to give dates to the "battles" of the first campaign.

Jim Ross