Friday, January 8, 2016

2016 Why the Book of Naomi? Or "The Palace of Minos"?

Ben poses the question to the previous two essays; what explanation might we find of WD Gann referring, apparently, to a non existent book of the Bible, Naomi?  For convenience, the reference to the Biblical character is found on page 128 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and is:


My first thought was, like in other places in "The Tunnel Thru the Air," Mr. Gann makes intentional errors to call attention to a very important thought.  For example, he misspells the word "Mammouth" in referring to the 110-story Mammouth Building.  110-stories, tallest building in NYC, known as the cedar (reminiscent of Isaiah 9/10-11, the sycamore, the stones have fallen....), focus of the fictional great attack of 1932 on New York City.  [If Mr. Gann's prophecy of 9/11 interests you and you have not read the "6th Manifest Prophecy" you can find it HERE.]  Use of intentional errors is a technique of Philo of Alexander, a primary philosopher whose rules of enigma are thought to have influenced Mark, Luke and the writer of Revelation (see HERE and rule 19 regarding intentional errors).  I find many of those rules used in TTTTA, misspelling being only the simplest of them.

"In Naomi" suggests there is a "Book of Naomi" in the Bible and, as Ben points out, there isn't such a book.  Rule 19 of Philo's rules of enigma; intentional error.  Being very Bible illiterate, I tried to refresh my memory of the Book of Naomi and was reminded of my pathetic Bible background when I didn't find it.

Why Naomi?  Was it the story of Naomi's loss of family, her travels with Ruth, return to her home and redemption?  I don't think so.  It seems like entirely superfluous information in the context of the page...Rule 2 of Philo's rules of enigma.

I propose 4 purposes of Naomi (aside from the goodness of the story itself):

First, the obvious.  It was a means to focus the reader on this paragraph.

Second, once attention is focused on the riddle of Naomi's placement, the paragraph itself, point blank, tells the reader there is a prophecy; "Notice this prophecy."  And the prophecy would seem to be twofold; first a bridge that opens our rivers and then second a suspension bridge that opens our rivers.  This discussion takes place in association with the year 1989 which can be seen in the right most dates above.  This is all explained in the immediately previous two essays.  How awkward; the story of Naomi's Biblical struggle, then a "Notice of Prophecy."  The latter, a striking statement of fact, again Rule 20 of Philo's rules of enigma.

Third, and this is what just struck me; "Naomi" is an anagram for Minoa.  That great page 77 of TTTTA which declares Mr. Gann's methods are mathematic science fused with the Biblical concept that history repeats.  I provide two of the paragraphs of that page for convenience:


As proof that history repeats, Mr. Gann cites "The Palace of Minos" which is of the ancient Mediterranean island Minoan civilization.  Minoa...again, the people of the country of Minoa, an anagram of Naomi.  Does the, apparently superfluous story of Naomi seem to have some greater purpose now?  Of course, only if you do not negate it as "just a coincidence."

A fourth and more troubling purpose; not just to tell us of two earthquakes, one that has manifested in the 1989 Lomo Prieta earthquake and one that may occur in late February 2016.  Perhaps Naomi/Minoa suggests the scope of the latter prediction; that unknown fate which befell the Minoan civilization.

[As an aside, the acrostic and telestic words that are spelled in the second insert are incredible.  We have "toa,"  "SAET," "two," and "sees."  The acrostic "two" and "sees" have highly subjective meaning and I have my ideas on them that aren't worth explanation because of that subjectivity.  But "toa" and "SAET;" now those are specific.

Remember your high school geometry; "TOA" or "Tangent = Opposite over Adjacent."  Math is the only science Mr. Gann tells us.  I find "TOA" encoded at other places in TTTTA and suspect it defines a mathematical structure within the mapping of lines in TTTTA.  I have yet to define that geometric structure.

And SAET.  The "3rd Manifest Prophecy" as I have defined 7 prophecies at present, is World War II.  Moreover, one of the three themes of TTTTA is war (love and spirit are the other two in my conception).  And one of the greatest weapons of WWII was the Germanb undersea boat with their torpedoes.  Very shortly after the end of WWII, Russia developed the SAET 50 and 60 passive acoustic honing torpedo which became the successor Russian 53-59 series.  Before the 53-59 series was created and the SAET 50 and 60 series was retired, I recall a discussion that indicated the SAET 100 was in planning but scrapped.  The acrostic "SAET" is followed by "C," the Roman numeral for 100.  As yet a further aside, Russia has developed (1990s) a torpedo (Shkval) capable of speeds to 200 MPH based on the dynamics of supercavitation propulsion that are theorized to be the cause of ships lost in the Bermuda Triangle (see HERE).]

Jim Ross

8 comments:

  1. Jim, fascinating as always.
    http://gnosticwarrior.com/knossus.html

    While digging, I found this interesting that the capital city of the Minoans was Knossus, which sounds much like gnosis, a concept/topic certainly near and dear to Mr. Gann's heart.

    Hope you are well.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remember the many essays I wrote on pages 128 and 129. We find at the bottom of 128 that 9M copies of the Bible were sold in 8 years and 240M have been sold for all time. Those numbers can be used to generate each of the 8 notes (including 'Do' high and low) of the Pythagorean diatonic scale.

    On the top of the next page you'll find the Hammer and the Anvil a poem written by a prominent Mason. The hammer wears against the enduring anvil (Bible). You might also recall that Pythagoras discovered the diatonic scale according to the sounds made by differing weight hammer against the anvil (which could not have happened that way according to physics).
    And then, if you compared the first paragraph of that poem on pg 129 to the actual poem, you will find Mr. Gann changed it. Why? He did it to acrostically spell the word "LATO" which is a city located on Crete. Very close to Minos. It is also where Pythagoras was thought to have traveled to discover the "ancient knowledge". Errr, if it was ancient when Pythagoras was alive, how ancient is it now?
    Thanks DM, I'd know noticed "Knossus."
    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great call... I now remember that essay (It was in my "attic")
    I find it fascinating how important Minos/Crete is to Gann and that the capital city was Knossus/Gnosis, which in the modern vernacular means "knowledge of spiritual mysteries."

    Gnosis, Pythagoras, the harmony of the spheres, the diatonic scale.... All trace to a civilization I know next to nothing about (other than the Minotaur of lore). Amazing how deep the rabbit hole goes sometimes.

    Thanks, as always, Jim

    ReplyDelete
  4. It crossed my mind in the context of San Francisco, what happened to Minoa. As I recall, Minoa was a collection of villages scattered around Crete and other islands. Late, of course, was entirely land based as is Minos. Floods perhaps? Water?

    In that further thought, the movie "Knowing" offers 4 disasters; an oil rig explosion (hmm, kinda like the later that occurred a year after Knowing was released), an airplane terrorist act, a subway terrorist act and a solar flair apocalypse.

    Water > air > land > fire.

    Presently, I've detected "clues" that give me 1) February 21-24 2016 San Francisco replicating the 1958 earthquake that created the greatest and megatsunami in history and 2) March 2-19 2016 which would be an outbreak of disease similar to the NYC cholera epidemic of the fall of 1848. Those 2 would be water and air.

    I have dates of concern that I've identified of May 9 and October 19. Perhaps land and fire?

    I wonder if there is such an analogy in TTTTA beginning with the first battle of San Francisco where the US Pacific Fleet is destroyed off the coast of San Francisco? Water..... What might be air, land and then fire? Air would be the air skirmishes in which RG was shot down. Land would be when he was on the ground destroying the airborne enemy with the death ray. And fire would be the aerial death ray destroying every great building on earth during the 7 days.

    Just blue skying it, perhaps there's support, perhaps not,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for mentioning me - lol, im famous now.

    Look at your screenshot of this article top right :
    desy = Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron

    Fits nicely to the text for whatever reason its placed there.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You did it again Ben. "DESY" opposite WD Gann's declaration that mathematics is the only science on which all men and countries agree. DESY is representative of the most elemental level of matter and thus physics. Math and physics at the center of all things. Great catch!!!

    I have created an acrostic/telestic "finder" and a quick scan discloses that there are 4 telestic occurrences of 'DESY.' The one you identified on page 129, then exactly double that at 258, then on 310 and finally on 317. Four occurrences. A meaningful four letter word spelled telestically is improbable. A four letter word spelled in four places is extremely improbable.

    Now, I had identified "DES" or data encryption standard, a cryptology method developed in the early '70s by IBM....errr with the generous help of the NSA to ensure they could break it. In Robert Gordon's tel talk we have the early cell phones which could be invaded by bad people (like the sweet grandparents who accidentally hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls and accidentally taped them and accidentally gave them to a US Senator who accidentally published them). The next iteration of the DES was DEA or data encryption algorithm. That unbreakable (I think) technology made it far less likely that conversations could be broken....hence, the newer iteration of Robert Gordon's phone to which the Allied Enemy could not listen.

    I'd held the DES thing back from essay for quite a while, not being so enthusiastic about WDG's prediction of world inventions. You've inspired me and I thank you,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  7. BEN!!!!! Great find, and welcome to the grandstands of Jim's endeavors. I was getting lonely here ;)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Hi Jim again, Hi Dolemite,

    I'm happy if I could help. It's a fascinating subject.


    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.